Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 06:08 PM Mar 2014

Putin’s media head threatens to turn US into “radioactive ash”

Vladimir Putin’s propaganda chief, Dmitry Kisilev, the new head of Russian government-run and financed media/propaganda arm RIA Novosti, appeared to threaten to turn the United States into “radioactive ash” today.

Kisilev made the comments on state television in front of an image of a huge mushroom cloud.

Just to further clarify how important Kisilev is, here’s Leonid Ragozin, a former employee of both the BBC and the Russian-language version of Newsweek:

more

http://americablog.com/2014/03/putins-media-head-threatens-turn-us-radioactive-ash.html

He does remind me of a punk ass version of Dr. Evil

?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent

http://americablog.com/2014/03/putins-media-head-threatens-turn-us-radioactive-ash.html
43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Putin’s media head threatens to turn US into “radioactive ash” (Original Post) n2doc Mar 2014 OP
Yet some morons insist CNN and MSNBC are worse geek tragedy Mar 2014 #1
The big difference betweetn RT and CNN is Cha Mar 2014 #22
foolishness: But the translation isn't a direct threat, rather newthinking Mar 2014 #30
I was thinking of a recent failed presidential candidate. pangaia Mar 2014 #32
Speech act. Igel Mar 2014 #42
Hell, Fukishima will do that sooner than later anyhow.n/t dixiegrrrrl Mar 2014 #2
Said no scientist ever. nt geek tragedy Mar 2014 #4
They might if they had funding. Octafish Mar 2014 #33
This is what empires look like when they're falling. joshcryer Mar 2014 #3
Shows the importance of getting the nukes deactivated and destroyed. geek tragedy Mar 2014 #5
I honestly don't think they will go *that* far. AverageJoe90 Mar 2014 #27
Are they putting steriods in the water over sufrommich Mar 2014 #6
Well, their dictator does wrestle bears. nt geek tragedy Mar 2014 #7
Elevating the tough talk doesn't help reduce the rhetoric seveneyes Mar 2014 #19
No one in the US is escalating. Neither are they being bullied. nt geek tragedy Mar 2014 #23
The US? karynnj Mar 2014 #24
Dr Evil says the hearts of gay people should be burned after Bluenorthwest Mar 2014 #8
They grow increasingly reactionary.nt sufrommich Mar 2014 #10
Let me guess, this is worse than threatening to "obliterate" Iran? Fumesucker Mar 2014 #9
as in Bomb bomb bomb Iran malaise Mar 2014 #16
Actually I was thinking of a Secretary of State Fumesucker Mar 2014 #18
who was jsut in Ukraine dixiegrrrrl Mar 2014 #37
I noticed some Putin's DUwater carriers arely staircase Mar 2014 #11
... Rex Mar 2014 #12
the grey suit in the video does not help wheniwasincongress Mar 2014 #26
Blogwriter is a bit out of date - RIA Novosti became defunct last year. dipsydoodle Mar 2014 #13
So this guy is in charge of rt.com geek tragedy Mar 2014 #14
It is an GP6971 Mar 2014 #20
Well one Sarah Palin suggested that the only thing better than a bad guy with a malaise Mar 2014 #15
Well I do hope Kerry or whomever does not try more tough talk seveneyes Mar 2014 #17
Who cares what you think? Sometimes tough talk is a requirement functioning_cog Mar 2014 #21
Tough talk GP6971 Mar 2014 #25
You could have left off that first sentence and been a lot more credible sounding. snappyturtle Mar 2014 #29
I CARE what seveneyes thinks. That's who. pangaia Mar 2014 #34
That is ridiculously reckless. Laelth Mar 2014 #28
Let's hope it is all bluster. Rex Mar 2014 #31
Of course not. n/t GP6971 Mar 2014 #35
I think Putin is counting GP6971 Mar 2014 #36
Any other older DUers having flashbacks right about now? Brigid Mar 2014 #38
I think the actual quote was ozone_man Mar 2014 #39
Sounds like a case of possession with intent to deliver jsr Mar 2014 #43
Someone doesn't like the fact we spoke up. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #40
who would have thought that when he just wanted arely staircase Mar 2014 #41
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
1. Yet some morons insist CNN and MSNBC are worse
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 06:12 PM
Mar 2014

than Russian state media.

I also wonder if the rt.com-quoting Russopologists will denounce this.

Well, no I don't.

Cha

(297,284 posts)
22. The big difference betweetn RT and CNN is
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 06:45 PM
Mar 2014

RT is Propaganda for the Russian Government and CNN is Propaganda against This Gov and For the CorpKoch Types. The thing they have in common is Putin is against Gays and so are the Koch idiots.

MSNBC is too broad a brush.. it has it pockets of reality.

newthinking

(3,982 posts)
30. foolishness: But the translation isn't a direct threat, rather
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 07:43 PM
Mar 2014

He says that (paraphrased)

"the US knows that Russia is the only country that can turn their country into radioactive ash". It is more of an analytical boast of why the "US can't do anything" than a threat.

Certainly a stupid thing for someone at his level of power, but we have those who do much the same do we not?

Igel

(35,317 posts)
42. Speech act.
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 10:56 PM
Mar 2014

"It would be a real shame if somebody got newthinking to click on a link that reformatted his hard drive. Oh, by the way, here's a link ..."

Hey, it's a real, heart-felt sentiment. It's not a threat. And if the link just happened to reformat your hard drive ... who knew?

In fact, that kind of utterance is very often a veiled threat. It's like just happening to punch your hand when talking to somebody you want to stay away from your girl. The problem is that it relies crucially on listener interpretation and speaker intent. If you don't want to see the intent (or aren't informed enough to recognize it), you have plausible deniability. At the same time, the speaker also has plausible deniability.

It's a classic when it comes to teenager "this may become a fight" conversations.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
33. They might if they had funding.
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 07:50 PM
Mar 2014

I don't know about you, but I find it dissapointing to learn that research on fallout from Fukushima does not get funded in the United States -- even after radioactive sulfur from Fukushima was monitored in Southern California.



Ocean water off La Jolla coast being monitored (and not) for Fukushima radiation

By Pat Sherman
La Jolla Light, Feb. 4, 2014

EXCERPT...

In 2011 Thiemens and a crew of UCSD atmospheric chemists reported the first quantitative measurement of the amount of radiation leaked from the damaged nuclear reactor in Fukushima, following the devastating earthquake and tsunami there.

Their estimate was based on radioactive sulfur that wafted across the Pacific Ocean after operators of the damaged reactor had to cool overheated fuel with seawater — causing a chemical reaction between byproducts of nuclear fission and chlorine ions in the saltwater.

Thiemens has, for the past several years, unsuccessfully sought to obtain grant funding to follow-up his research, first reported on Aug. 15 2011 in the online edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

However, he said neither the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Environmental Protection Agency, California Air Resources Board or National Academy of Sciences (of which he is a member) were interested in funding additional research to measure the Fukushima fallout.

“It’s probably one of these things that just fell through the cracks,” Thiemens said. “It doesn’t quite fall under classical (research criteria).”

CONTINUED...

http://www.lajollalight.com/2014/02/04/ocean-water-off-la-jolla-coast-being-monitored-for-fukushima-radiation/



So, there's that part of the reality.
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
5. Shows the importance of getting the nukes deactivated and destroyed.
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 06:19 PM
Mar 2014

The temptation to go North Korea will eventually be too much to resist.

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
27. I honestly don't think they will go *that* far.
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 06:52 PM
Mar 2014

I am, however, concerned about the possibility of nuclear terrorism(even if it's only slight), perhaps some from rogue ultra-nationalists.....including, perhaps, neo-fascist elements from within Russia. Wouldn't surprise me one bit if there were guys like that in the United Russia party right now, TBH.

 

seveneyes

(4,631 posts)
19. Elevating the tough talk doesn't help reduce the rhetoric
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 06:44 PM
Mar 2014

The US needs to back the fuck off this can of shit.

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
24. The US?
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 06:47 PM
Mar 2014

Did you listen to either the President or SoS? They are NOT the ones escalating this - it is Russia.



 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
8. Dr Evil says the hearts of gay people should be burned after
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 06:26 PM
Mar 2014

accidents to make sure they are not transplanted into real people. He says this on national television, State television to be precise.

malaise

(269,039 posts)
16. as in Bomb bomb bomb Iran
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 06:41 PM
Mar 2014

and that was from a sitting Senior Senator and former Presidential candidate.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
37. who was jsut in Ukraine
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 08:40 PM
Mar 2014

"calming" things...
cause everytime there is a big problem that will result in headlines, McCain's got to photo bomb it.
Then he goes away and things continue right on.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
11. I noticed some Putin's DUwater carriers
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 06:30 PM
Mar 2014

have been reminding us of Russias nukes all of a suden.

gotta admire the message discipline

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
13. Blogwriter is a bit out of date - RIA Novosti became defunct last year.
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 06:34 PM
Mar 2014

On 9 December 2013 President of Russia Vladimir Putin signed the liquidation of RIA Novosti and merging it with the international radio service Voice of Russia to create International Information Agency Russia Today.[2] Dmitry Konstantinovich Kiselev, a former anchorman of the Channel One Russia is appointed as the president of the new information agency. It is unclear at the moment whether the new agency will include the TV network Russia Today.[3][12] According to her interview, the editor-in-chief of the TV network Russia Today, Margarita Simonyan was completely unaware about the reorganization of the information agency and got the information from listening competitor radio station Kommersant-FM.[13]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RIA_Novosti

The website is maintained in that name due to worldwide familiarity with the name.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
14. So this guy is in charge of rt.com
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 06:37 PM
Mar 2014

and yet we still have people who pimp rt.com while pretending to be progressives. Amazing.

malaise

(269,039 posts)
15. Well one Sarah Palin suggested that the only thing better than a bad guy with a
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 06:40 PM
Mar 2014

nuke is a good guy with a nuke. She was once the Vice Presidential candidate.
It's all madness. The West can't do shite - because they destroyed their own credibility.

 

seveneyes

(4,631 posts)
17. Well I do hope Kerry or whomever does not try more tough talk
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 06:41 PM
Mar 2014

Throwing more threats and insults on top of this smoldering pile of shit does not help matters one bit.

 

functioning_cog

(294 posts)
21. Who cares what you think? Sometimes tough talk is a requirement
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 06:45 PM
Mar 2014

In diplomacy with hostile leaders and their corrupt insiders.

GP6971

(31,165 posts)
25. Tough talk
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 06:50 PM
Mar 2014

Requires something to back it up. I don't think any member of NATO is interested in military conflict and economic sanctions will hurt Russia, but also hurt the EU.

snappyturtle

(14,656 posts)
29. You could have left off that first sentence and been a lot more credible sounding.
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 07:02 PM
Mar 2014

I care what seveneyes has to say...and you too. We may not agree but....imho.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
31. Let's hope it is all bluster.
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 07:47 PM
Mar 2014

Hey, wonder how those GOPers feel about Putin now? All those republicans that LOVE Putin and called Obama weak...think they will turn on a dime and now condemn the dictator?

GP6971

(31,165 posts)
36. I think Putin is counting
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 08:33 PM
Mar 2014

on the "dialogue" going on within NATO and the EU. While they dither about what to do, Putin is "taking action".

The real telling point will be if starts taking over sections of the eastern Ukraine. The west will have no choice but to react. In what manner remains to seen.

Brigid

(17,621 posts)
38. Any other older DUers having flashbacks right about now?
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 08:43 PM
Mar 2014

A chaotic, authoritarian country with no history of democracy is practically designed to produce sociopaths and other assorted crazies -- and it does.

ozone_man

(4,825 posts)
39. I think the actual quote was
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 08:48 PM
Mar 2014

"Russia is the only country in the world realistically capable of turning the United States into radioactive ash," anchor Dmitry Kiselyov said on his weekly news show on state-controlled Rossiya 1 television

http://news.yahoo.com/state-tv-says-russia-could-turn-us-radioactive-212003397.html

You have to be careful about stuff that wasn't said. We don't to start a nuclear war.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Putin’s media head threat...