General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPutin’s media head threatens to turn US into “radioactive ash”
Vladimir Putins propaganda chief, Dmitry Kisilev, the new head of Russian government-run and financed media/propaganda arm RIA Novosti, appeared to threaten to turn the United States into radioactive ash today.
Kisilev made the comments on state television in front of an image of a huge mushroom cloud.
Just to further clarify how important Kisilev is, heres Leonid Ragozin, a former employee of both the BBC and the Russian-language version of Newsweek:
more
http://americablog.com/2014/03/putins-media-head-threatens-turn-us-radioactive-ash.html
He does remind me of a punk ass version of Dr. Evil
http://americablog.com/2014/03/putins-media-head-threatens-turn-us-radioactive-ash.html
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)than Russian state media.
I also wonder if the rt.com-quoting Russopologists will denounce this.
Well, no I don't.
Cha
(297,284 posts)RT is Propaganda for the Russian Government and CNN is Propaganda against This Gov and For the CorpKoch Types. The thing they have in common is Putin is against Gays and so are the Koch idiots.
MSNBC is too broad a brush.. it has it pockets of reality.
newthinking
(3,982 posts)He says that (paraphrased)
"the US knows that Russia is the only country that can turn their country into radioactive ash". It is more of an analytical boast of why the "US can't do anything" than a threat.
Certainly a stupid thing for someone at his level of power, but we have those who do much the same do we not?
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Igel
(35,317 posts)"It would be a real shame if somebody got newthinking to click on a link that reformatted his hard drive. Oh, by the way, here's a link ..."
Hey, it's a real, heart-felt sentiment. It's not a threat. And if the link just happened to reformat your hard drive ... who knew?
In fact, that kind of utterance is very often a veiled threat. It's like just happening to punch your hand when talking to somebody you want to stay away from your girl. The problem is that it relies crucially on listener interpretation and speaker intent. If you don't want to see the intent (or aren't informed enough to recognize it), you have plausible deniability. At the same time, the speaker also has plausible deniability.
It's a classic when it comes to teenager "this may become a fight" conversations.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)I don't know about you, but I find it dissapointing to learn that research on fallout from Fukushima does not get funded in the United States -- even after radioactive sulfur from Fukushima was monitored in Southern California.
Ocean water off La Jolla coast being monitored (and not) for Fukushima radiation
By Pat Sherman
La Jolla Light, Feb. 4, 2014
EXCERPT...
In 2011 Thiemens and a crew of UCSD atmospheric chemists reported the first quantitative measurement of the amount of radiation leaked from the damaged nuclear reactor in Fukushima, following the devastating earthquake and tsunami there.
Their estimate was based on radioactive sulfur that wafted across the Pacific Ocean after operators of the damaged reactor had to cool overheated fuel with seawater causing a chemical reaction between byproducts of nuclear fission and chlorine ions in the saltwater.
Thiemens has, for the past several years, unsuccessfully sought to obtain grant funding to follow-up his research, first reported on Aug. 15 2011 in the online edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
However, he said neither the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Environmental Protection Agency, California Air Resources Board or National Academy of Sciences (of which he is a member) were interested in funding additional research to measure the Fukushima fallout.
Its probably one of these things that just fell through the cracks, Thiemens said. It doesnt quite fall under classical (research criteria).
CONTINUED...
http://www.lajollalight.com/2014/02/04/ocean-water-off-la-jolla-coast-being-monitored-for-fukushima-radiation/
So, there's that part of the reality.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)Russia has really sunk from its peak.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)The temptation to go North Korea will eventually be too much to resist.
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)I am, however, concerned about the possibility of nuclear terrorism(even if it's only slight), perhaps some from rogue ultra-nationalists.....including, perhaps, neo-fascist elements from within Russia. Wouldn't surprise me one bit if there were guys like that in the United Russia party right now, TBH.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)there? Who knew Russians could be so cartoonishly macho?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)seveneyes
(4,631 posts)The US needs to back the fuck off this can of shit.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)karynnj
(59,504 posts)Did you listen to either the President or SoS? They are NOT the ones escalating this - it is Russia.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)accidents to make sure they are not transplanted into real people. He says this on national television, State television to be precise.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)malaise
(269,039 posts)and that was from a sitting Senior Senator and former Presidential candidate.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)But Senior Senator will do too.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)"calming" things...
cause everytime there is a big problem that will result in headlines, McCain's got to photo bomb it.
Then he goes away and things continue right on.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)have been reminding us of Russias nukes all of a suden.
gotta admire the message discipline
wheniwasincongress
(1,307 posts)dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)On 9 December 2013 President of Russia Vladimir Putin signed the liquidation of RIA Novosti and merging it with the international radio service Voice of Russia to create International Information Agency Russia Today.[2] Dmitry Konstantinovich Kiselev, a former anchorman of the Channel One Russia is appointed as the president of the new information agency. It is unclear at the moment whether the new agency will include the TV network Russia Today.[3][12] According to her interview, the editor-in-chief of the TV network Russia Today, Margarita Simonyan was completely unaware about the reorganization of the information agency and got the information from listening competitor radio station Kommersant-FM.[13]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RIA_Novosti
The website is maintained in that name due to worldwide familiarity with the name.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)and yet we still have people who pimp rt.com while pretending to be progressives. Amazing.
GP6971
(31,165 posts)amazing contradiction.
malaise
(269,039 posts)nuke is a good guy with a nuke. She was once the Vice Presidential candidate.
It's all madness. The West can't do shite - because they destroyed their own credibility.
seveneyes
(4,631 posts)Throwing more threats and insults on top of this smoldering pile of shit does not help matters one bit.
functioning_cog
(294 posts)In diplomacy with hostile leaders and their corrupt insiders.
GP6971
(31,165 posts)Requires something to back it up. I don't think any member of NATO is interested in military conflict and economic sanctions will hurt Russia, but also hurt the EU.
snappyturtle
(14,656 posts)I care what seveneyes has to say...and you too. We may not agree but....imho.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Laelth
(32,017 posts)This may be cause for alarm.
-Laelth
Rex
(65,616 posts)Hey, wonder how those GOPers feel about Putin now? All those republicans that LOVE Putin and called Obama weak...think they will turn on a dime and now condemn the dictator?
GP6971
(31,165 posts)GP6971
(31,165 posts)on the "dialogue" going on within NATO and the EU. While they dither about what to do, Putin is "taking action".
The real telling point will be if starts taking over sections of the eastern Ukraine. The west will have no choice but to react. In what manner remains to seen.
Brigid
(17,621 posts)A chaotic, authoritarian country with no history of democracy is practically designed to produce sociopaths and other assorted crazies -- and it does.
ozone_man
(4,825 posts)"Russia is the only country in the world realistically capable of turning the United States into radioactive ash," anchor Dmitry Kiselyov said on his weekly news show on state-controlled Rossiya 1 television
http://news.yahoo.com/state-tv-says-russia-could-turn-us-radioactive-212003397.html
You have to be careful about stuff that wasn't said. We don't to start a nuclear war.
jsr
(7,712 posts)We ought to nuke them first, no?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)to burn my heart were the good old days?