General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNew JET-Powered Drone Can Kill 1,800 Miles From Home Base (Afghanistan/Pakistan Patrol)
New Jet-Powered Drone Can Kill 1,800 Miles From Home Base
By Allen McDuffee
Image: General Atomics
The U.S. may be forced to withdraw troops completely from Afghanistan by the end of the year. Thats bad news if youre the CIA and your lethal drone flights over neighboring Pakistan rely on the close proximity of Afghan airstrips.
Not surprisingly, the defense industry has already produced a solution: a new jet-powered drone that can range 1,800 miles from the nearest base.
The Avenger (formerly Predator C), whose prototype flew its first flight in 2009, is operationally ready after a new round of tests completed last month, according to its maker, General Atomics. Based on the companys more well-known MQ-9 Reaper drone, Avenger is designed to perform high-speed, long-endurance surveillance or strike missions, flying up to 500 mph at a maximum of 50,000 feet for as long as 18 hours.
Compared to its earlier prototype, Avengers fuselage has been increased by four feet to accommodate larger payloads and more fuel, allowing for extended missions. It can carry up to 3,500 pounds internally, and its 66-foot wingspan is capable of carrying weapons as large as a 2,000-pound Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM).
Switching from propeller-driven drones to jets will allow the CIA to continue its Pakistan strikes from a more distant base, if and when the U.S. is forced to withdraw troops entirely from neighboring Afghanistan.
According to a recent Los Angeles Times report, the Obama administration is actively making contingency plans in Central Asia to continue its drone surveillance and missile attacks in northwest Pakistan, because current security arrangements with Afghanistan require U.S. military protection of CIA drone bases.
Earlier this month, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel acknowledged that defense and intelligence officials are scouting alternative bases for drones in the face of a withdrawal from Afghanistan by the end of 2014.
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2014/02/avenger/
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)Unit cost
$12 million to $15 million
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Atomics_Avenger
LiberalEsto
(22,845 posts)The CIA must be very, very happy
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)SKYNET is happy!
The explosion in drones like this is really a testament to the genius of aviation engineers and scientists.
And I doubt we'll hear too many people complaining when this tech starts to benefit the civilian market.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)Murder and destruction will benefit mankind........ someday.
CFLDem
(2,083 posts)Which is why you eagerly offered evidence to the contrary.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)on the benefits of the military industrial complex.
How about these apples?
Killing our way to peace
http://rossbishop.com/blog/2013/05/07/killing-our-way-to-peace/
CFLDem
(2,083 posts)which you have not offered up so far.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)who needs teachers when you can teach the world a lesson.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)But perhaps America should put its talents to better use? Do we have to use our talents on killing machines?
KoKo
(84,711 posts)That's what I wonder, also. So...it saves money on troop support: meals, salaries, housing and rehab for injuries.
BUT...what does this REALLY MEAN?
It means from past experience that we fly over countries we PAY OFF to KILL THEIR CITIZENS with the Collateral Damage of Wedding Parties, children and families...all gone to save bucks on soldiers pay and care?
It's disgusting! Using High Tech which kills and allows us to do this WITHOUT DECLARING WAR... We do it by Stealth! ...and the Payoffs to Oligarch's who rule countries where the people are exploited.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)Cost Efficient some say... Will it be?
Response to KoKo (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed