General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsunblock
(52,248 posts)fortunately, there a better way -- just give the money to poor people instead of those rich lazy bums!
brooklynite
(94,591 posts)Qutzupalotl
(14,316 posts)Fuck puffins. Seriously, FUCK PUFFINS.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Barbara's Bakery or no.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)No one gives a shit about that.
A slight double standard taking place there.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)....but we can't tax THEM now can we???
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Oil subsidies, no-bid contracts for military contractors. 60% of budget going towards Military...
7962
(11,841 posts)But theres still no reason to have anyone going hungry in the US. Right, do away with those oil subsidies and ,ost of the others as well!
rickyhall
(4,889 posts)7962
(11,841 posts)Here's what an actual budget pie chart looks like
http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/defense_budget_2012_3.html
And if you want to compare REAL spending by country, try this one
http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/MS.MIL.XPND.GD.ZS
You'll see Russia and others spend just as much of their GDP on defense as we do
mbperrin
(7,672 posts)Country A spends 10% of their $1 billion GDP on war = $100 million
Country B spends 1% of their $16 trillion GDP on war = $160 billion.
Guess who created more war, more havoc, more casualties? Yeah, the 1% guys. You don't get an extra discount for having a small GDP so that you get more stuff to kill strangers you never met.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/06/defense-spending-fact-of-the-day_n_1746685.html
"The United States spends 58 percent of the total defense dollars paid out by the world's top 10 military powers, which combined for $1.19 trillion in military funding in 2011. With its unparalleled global reach, the US outspends China, the next-biggest military power, by nearly 6-to-1."
7962
(11,841 posts)China has been building up their navy and other military divisions without a large uptick in their spending. I guess they could be using forced labor and little pay. You REALLY think they only spend 120 billion? With a force of 5-7 million?
And the subject of what we DO with the military is another thing. We're talking about spending and what we can afford. Sure, we wasted lord knows how many 100's of billions on Iraq. I hate using that term "wasted" since we lost 4k+ people there, but as I'm sure we both agree, that war was criminal.
toby jo
(1,269 posts)7962
(11,841 posts)But for the most part I think we do. Certainly there are line items that cant be explained, i.e. secret operations. But there's only about a thousand different non-gov groups who dissect where the money goes. And depending on which party is in office, half of those groups are looking for something wrong to throw at the current administration.
I also believe there IS room to cut. We have about 1000 military bases overseas. I'm sure we could close a good number of those without sacrificing any capability. That would save a LOT right there. Operating even a small overseas base takes a lot of money. And without losing jobs here in the US, like would happen if we started closing more bases here. We already have a lot fewer in country than in years past.
And then there's the weapons programs that the Pentagon doesnt want. I would think they would want anything that would help them, so if they deem it expendable, it should be looked at. Of course, congress doesnt want to lose the jobs in their district making whatever it is on the table, either.
But with the world the way it is today and the economy being global compared to 50 yrs ago, we cannot afford to give the appearance of not being ready to stand against some aggression elsewhere in the world. Or we will regret it, as we have in the past.
mbperrin
(7,672 posts)Total waste, nothing else.
And if you don't believe the reports from the ground, how will you get a better number? As I said, GDP is a meaningless, easily manipulated number used because it's convenient and cheap to get, not because it's an indicator of any kind of quality of life.
Remote island, disease-free, food grows just for the picking, no need for clothes, even. No manufacturing. Paradise. GDP: $0
Same island, wracked by cancer in every inhabitant, most expensive hospitals and treatments built and administered with a 25% cure rate. Hell on earth. GDP: billions of dollars.
See?
7962
(11,841 posts)mbperrin
(7,672 posts)There is none so blind as he who will not see.
Senseless to continue any discussion with someone who will not discuss, so see you around.
7962
(11,841 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)mbperrin
(7,672 posts)charge. Your chart also fails to parse out how much of the medical is spend on military casualties and rehab - all costs of war.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)60% of our collected tax dollars.
xchrom
(108,903 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,732 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)Well, yes, I understand the Icelanders are quite fond of their eggs.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)No we need more bleeding heart commie pinko liberals.
adirondacker
(2,921 posts)They are on the menus in many of the restaurants and served much like duck. It's one of two things I avoided eating there, the other was whale. I did however manage to keep the Hákarl down when it was offered during a backpacking trip. My thought were "why can't you keep to smoked herring". :/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H%C3%A1karl
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)Do you really think we can win people to our side with lunacy?
daleanime
(17,796 posts)Already proven that reason doesn't work. Lets speak their own language for awhile, who knows.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)Has compassion really been tried?
I would argue that neither of them has.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)doesn't make it true, but please enjoy yourself.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)If you read the fine print.
I believe in Section T4e subsection IV paragraph six line five that it specificially states
"When, and if, the party of the third person (okay, now here you have to go back twelve pages to read that "the party of the third person, going by the username 'hfojvt' on the website Democratic Underground..." although a careful reading would mean you already KNOW that.) argues that something is true, that makes it true."
Although, unless you have children, you may not have read "The Contract". It being a contract every parent is required to sign when a child is born in this universe.
Just FYI, that is how life, the universe and everything is set up.
I'm Zaphod Beeblebrox, baby. Can ya dig it?
uriel1972
(4,261 posts)Why not us?
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)but it only sells lunacy.
Kinda like an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind, fighting lunacy with lunacy just makes the whole world insane.
I am trying to stop the insanity. Not feed it.
And one of the ways the rightwing wins. Is that they have a mighty wurlitzer of a RightWing Noise Machine. And one of the things that the RWNM likes to sell to the public is this idea that liberals are nuts.
Makes for an easier sale if it happens to be true, doesn't it?
So pull the cord, make it stop, and get off the crazy train.
7962
(11,841 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)Thanks for posting
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)SNAP and Medicaid caseworker.
classykaren
(769 posts)Fuck the labels, that is just human decency.
Huge kick and Rec.
chompers
(22 posts)YOU should definitely be free to give as much as you please.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)enjoy your stay.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=profile&uid=312483
chompers
(22 posts)uriel1972
(4,261 posts)Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)With the added information about the comparison of the rape and pillage by Corporate welfare "people" with that of the combined fraud and abuse by a few individuals taking advantage of the system.
Chico Man
(3,001 posts)The quality of DU was much higher before the cheesy MySpace gif meme phenomenon struck. Non-searchability notwithstanding.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)kairos12
(12,862 posts)dembotoz
(16,808 posts)kairos12
(12,862 posts)cr8tvlde
(1,185 posts)Bonx
(2,053 posts)TeamPooka
(24,229 posts)N_E_1 for Tennis
(9,734 posts)Nt
tclambert
(11,087 posts)I wasn't quick enough to say, "Yeah, he might. But you know what else he might buy with it? FOOD!"
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)A month's prescription of anti-hypertension meds (lopressor) runs $4 at krogers pharmacy. Ditto all sorts of generic drugs people use to stay alive.
KG
(28,751 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Chaco Dundee
(334 posts)That is what makes us human.
guilty until proven innocent is the fucking Repukelican world view.
We are better than that. and... we need to frame it this way every time.
DeadLetterOffice
(1,352 posts)you are unworthy; your job as a poor person is thus to convince TPTB that you are still in fact a good person, a person deserving of assistance, even though you are poor. We have been this way since we imported the Elizabethan Poor Laws across the pond.
I cannot even begin to imagine what this country would look like if we started with the opposite assumption -- that if you are poor you are deserving of help until and unless you prove otherwise. I'd be a good bit prouder of it, that's for damn sure...
Paladin
(28,264 posts)nikto
(3,284 posts)I know he'd want them to have guns.
But food and shelter?
myrna minx
(22,772 posts)mountain grammy
(26,623 posts)mmm thinking of 50 votes to repeal the ACA. I feel it's NEVER a waste of my money when it actually gets to the people and pays for healthcare, food and shelter.
Rex
(65,616 posts)I think?
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Nanjing to Seoul
(2,088 posts)I want a bumper sticker: "Proud Commie Pinko Liberal" with that little Puffin.
Iwillnevergiveup
(9,298 posts)damn it!
K&R
Zorra
(27,670 posts)Bernie2016
(28 posts)Disinterest in economic work should not be a reason for poverty to begin with.
Response to Bernie2016 (Reply #69)
PowerToThePeople This message was self-deleted by its author.
Token Republican
(242 posts)1001 people show up.
You have enough to feed the first 1000.
As luck would have it, 1000 are lazy bums and 1 is someone in need.
The person in need is last on the line.
What now grasshopper?
If we had infinite resources, your premise is valid. But good intentions mixed with lazy bums and scarce resources means those in need will go without.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)... priorities.
Answer this please: If we can't afford to educate our children, to heal our sick and tend to our elderly, just what is it the defense budget is defending?
Token Republican
(242 posts)Answer this please: If we can't afford to educate our children, to heal our sick and tend to our elderly, just what is it the defense budget is defending?
In this thread, your example of the defense budget would be the lazy bums who waste resources.
Resources are scarce, in the sense they are not unlimited. The tipping point might be 1000 lazy bums, 10,000, 100,000 or a million. Lazy bums can be lazy individuals who play the system or have last name of Corp. or Inc. who play the system a different way.
Screening out Lazy Bum Inc & company is essentially setting priorities to make sure those in need are not deprived of resources by others.
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)... is perpetrated not by recipients, but by corporations contracted to administer the program.
Republicans, however, would seem to prefer to let thousands of legitimately needy folks starve rather than see one undeserving person get a benefit they don't deserve.
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)and still guard against fraud by whoever might perpatrate it.