Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
81 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
You can call me a bleeding heart commie pinko liberal, but (Original Post) Scuba Mar 2014 OP
bleeding heard commie pinko liberal! unblock Mar 2014 #1
...and the Puffin? brooklynite Mar 2014 #2
...has to sleep out in the cold. Qutzupalotl Mar 2014 #44
They're going exticnt. Warren DeMontague Mar 2014 #71
All the lazy trust fund bums have been living off us for ages PowerToThePeople Mar 2014 #3
...and corporations....and churches.... truebrit71 Mar 2014 #4
Exactly. PowerToThePeople Mar 2014 #6
20% of the budget is spent on defense and International Security, not 60%. 7962 Mar 2014 #29
Which planet are from? 20% OMG rickyhall Mar 2014 #48
Thats a useless chart. "Cost of military spending AND PAST WARS" Thats not the budget. 7962 Mar 2014 #50
GDP is a meaningless number. mbperrin Mar 2014 #52
You believe China and Russia and what they report?. GDP is NOT meaningless when it comes to economy 7962 Mar 2014 #61
Do you believe what America reports? toby jo Mar 2014 #64
Well,compared to Russia and China, yes. Do I think we know EVERYTHING, no. 7962 Mar 2014 #65
All wars are criminal. mbperrin Mar 2014 #68
Guess we shouldve stayed outta WW2 , too? And no , I dont see. 7962 Mar 2014 #70
Yes, we should have. mbperrin Mar 2014 #72
Wow. Whats to discuss? Your view is shared by hardly anyone. 7962 Mar 2014 #73
I agree that all wars are criminal. n/t PowerToThePeople Mar 2014 #74
We financed those past wars, still paying interest on that money, so yes, that's a valid mbperrin Mar 2014 #53
Maybe "budget" was not the correct terminology PowerToThePeople Mar 2014 #55
indeed. nt xchrom Mar 2014 #5
Bleeding heart commie pinko liberal puffin! The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2014 #7
You are a bleeding heart pinko commie and I agree with you. sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #8
SAME HERE! No doubt about it. Thanks for posting this! nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #9
Thank you and we need many more of those. n/t Cleita Mar 2014 #10
Puffins? Jackpine Radical Mar 2014 #18
Smart ass. Cleita Mar 2014 #35
Not just the eggs! adirondacker Mar 2014 #39
that's more lunacy than it is anything else hfojvt Mar 2014 #11
Why not? daleanime Mar 2014 #12
Has reason really been tried? hfojvt Mar 2014 #13
Feel free.... daleanime Mar 2014 #16
are you sure? hfojvt Mar 2014 #20
Conservative's have won over a fair block with it... uriel1972 Mar 2014 #23
well, lunacy does sell hfojvt Mar 2014 #24
They cant even win over THEMSELVES! nt 7962 Mar 2014 #31
True enough for me azurnoir Mar 2014 #14
It's why I love my job Puzzledtraveller Mar 2014 #15
Thank you for the job you do classykaren Mar 2014 #37
K & R riqster Mar 2014 #17
Yeah, that works. chompers Mar 2014 #19
Welcome to DU PowerToThePeople Mar 2014 #21
Thank you. chompers Mar 2014 #67
I'm good with this... nt uriel1972 Mar 2014 #22
This is my argument to the reactionaries. Fantastic Anarchist Mar 2014 #25
Can I say this? Chico Man Mar 2014 #26
HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!! WillyT Mar 2014 #27
I'd put the entire population on the dole rather than give any corporate welfare. kairos12 Mar 2014 #28
we always suspected that about you dembotoz Mar 2014 #30
I used to use a picture of the pretty bird to indicate no smoking in my house.. No puffin. kairos12 Mar 2014 #32
Count me in the BHCPL Party, too. Great Image...thanks. cr8tvlde Mar 2014 #33
You must pay a lot of taxes they can support 1000 people -nt Bonx Mar 2014 #34
ditto TeamPooka Mar 2014 #36
What more can be said? ... N_E_1 for Tennis Mar 2014 #38
A co-worker once said, "That guy you gave $5 to might just buy drugs with that, you know." tclambert Mar 2014 #40
And he might need those drugs. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2014 #63
that ratio is prolly other way around anyway... KG Mar 2014 #41
SO this. NT Adrahil Mar 2014 #42
yes sir Chaco Dundee Mar 2014 #43
YES! Agony Mar 2014 #45
It is the assumption in this country that if you are poor DeadLetterOffice Mar 2014 #46
Absolutely. (nt) Paladin Mar 2014 #47
Aw, 'cmon, do you think JESUS would agree? nikto Mar 2014 #49
K&R myrna minx Mar 2014 #51
K&R me b zola Mar 2014 #54
Of course, of course. There is so much waste of tax money mountain grammy Mar 2014 #56
Something we can all agree on? Rex Mar 2014 #57
These bums... Spitfire of ATJ Mar 2014 #58
Troglodytic Radic-lib! Nanjing to Seoul Mar 2014 #59
K&R ReRe Mar 2014 #60
Hunger hurts Iwillnevergiveup Mar 2014 #62
Proud LGBT bleeding heart commie pinko liberal flag flyer reporting for duty. Zorra Mar 2014 #66
I agree with this sentiment. Bernie2016 Mar 2014 #69
This message was self-deleted by its author PowerToThePeople Mar 2014 #75
1001 Token Republican Mar 2014 #76
Your argument assumes that resources are scarce. That isn't the case. It's all a matter of .... Scuba Mar 2014 #77
Priorities Token Republican Mar 2014 #81
Why should there have to be a choice? badtoworse Mar 2014 #78
In fact, there isn't. Fraud is actually rare in safety net programs, and most of the fraud .... Scuba Mar 2014 #79
There ought to be a way to get help to the folks who really need it... badtoworse Mar 2014 #80

unblock

(52,248 posts)
1. bleeding heard commie pinko liberal!
Wed Mar 19, 2014, 12:23 PM
Mar 2014

fortunately, there a better way -- just give the money to poor people instead of those rich lazy bums!

 

PowerToThePeople

(9,610 posts)
3. All the lazy trust fund bums have been living off us for ages
Wed Mar 19, 2014, 12:26 PM
Mar 2014

No one gives a shit about that.

A slight double standard taking place there.

 

PowerToThePeople

(9,610 posts)
6. Exactly.
Wed Mar 19, 2014, 12:29 PM
Mar 2014

Oil subsidies, no-bid contracts for military contractors. 60% of budget going towards Military...

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
29. 20% of the budget is spent on defense and International Security, not 60%.
Wed Mar 19, 2014, 03:07 PM
Mar 2014

But theres still no reason to have anyone going hungry in the US. Right, do away with those oil subsidies and ,ost of the others as well!

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
50. Thats a useless chart. "Cost of military spending AND PAST WARS" Thats not the budget.
Wed Mar 19, 2014, 09:20 PM
Mar 2014

Here's what an actual budget pie chart looks like
http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/defense_budget_2012_3.html

And if you want to compare REAL spending by country, try this one
http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/MS.MIL.XPND.GD.ZS
You'll see Russia and others spend just as much of their GDP on defense as we do

mbperrin

(7,672 posts)
52. GDP is a meaningless number.
Wed Mar 19, 2014, 11:07 PM
Mar 2014

Country A spends 10% of their $1 billion GDP on war = $100 million
Country B spends 1% of their $16 trillion GDP on war = $160 billion.

Guess who created more war, more havoc, more casualties? Yeah, the 1% guys. You don't get an extra discount for having a small GDP so that you get more stuff to kill strangers you never met.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/06/defense-spending-fact-of-the-day_n_1746685.html

"The United States spends 58 percent of the total defense dollars paid out by the world's top 10 military powers, which combined for $1.19 trillion in military funding in 2011. With its unparalleled global reach, the US outspends China, the next-biggest military power, by nearly 6-to-1."

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
61. You believe China and Russia and what they report?. GDP is NOT meaningless when it comes to economy
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 07:37 AM
Mar 2014

China has been building up their navy and other military divisions without a large uptick in their spending. I guess they could be using forced labor and little pay. You REALLY think they only spend 120 billion? With a force of 5-7 million?
And the subject of what we DO with the military is another thing. We're talking about spending and what we can afford. Sure, we wasted lord knows how many 100's of billions on Iraq. I hate using that term "wasted" since we lost 4k+ people there, but as I'm sure we both agree, that war was criminal.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
65. Well,compared to Russia and China, yes. Do I think we know EVERYTHING, no.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 02:59 PM
Mar 2014

But for the most part I think we do. Certainly there are line items that cant be explained, i.e. secret operations. But there's only about a thousand different non-gov groups who dissect where the money goes. And depending on which party is in office, half of those groups are looking for something wrong to throw at the current administration.

I also believe there IS room to cut. We have about 1000 military bases overseas. I'm sure we could close a good number of those without sacrificing any capability. That would save a LOT right there. Operating even a small overseas base takes a lot of money. And without losing jobs here in the US, like would happen if we started closing more bases here. We already have a lot fewer in country than in years past.
And then there's the weapons programs that the Pentagon doesnt want. I would think they would want anything that would help them, so if they deem it expendable, it should be looked at. Of course, congress doesnt want to lose the jobs in their district making whatever it is on the table, either.

But with the world the way it is today and the economy being global compared to 50 yrs ago, we cannot afford to give the appearance of not being ready to stand against some aggression elsewhere in the world. Or we will regret it, as we have in the past.

mbperrin

(7,672 posts)
68. All wars are criminal.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:20 PM
Mar 2014

Total waste, nothing else.

And if you don't believe the reports from the ground, how will you get a better number? As I said, GDP is a meaningless, easily manipulated number used because it's convenient and cheap to get, not because it's an indicator of any kind of quality of life.


Remote island, disease-free, food grows just for the picking, no need for clothes, even. No manufacturing. Paradise. GDP: $0
Same island, wracked by cancer in every inhabitant, most expensive hospitals and treatments built and administered with a 25% cure rate. Hell on earth. GDP: billions of dollars.

See?

mbperrin

(7,672 posts)
72. Yes, we should have.
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 12:53 AM
Mar 2014

There is none so blind as he who will not see.

Senseless to continue any discussion with someone who will not discuss, so see you around.

mbperrin

(7,672 posts)
53. We financed those past wars, still paying interest on that money, so yes, that's a valid
Wed Mar 19, 2014, 11:09 PM
Mar 2014

charge. Your chart also fails to parse out how much of the medical is spend on military casualties and rehab - all costs of war.

adirondacker

(2,921 posts)
39. Not just the eggs!
Wed Mar 19, 2014, 03:50 PM
Mar 2014

They are on the menus in many of the restaurants and served much like duck. It's one of two things I avoided eating there, the other was whale. I did however manage to keep the Hákarl down when it was offered during a backpacking trip. My thought were "why can't you keep to smoked herring". :/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H%C3%A1karl

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
11. that's more lunacy than it is anything else
Wed Mar 19, 2014, 12:43 PM
Mar 2014

Do you really think we can win people to our side with lunacy?

daleanime

(17,796 posts)
12. Why not?
Wed Mar 19, 2014, 01:00 PM
Mar 2014

Already proven that reason doesn't work. Lets speak their own language for awhile, who knows.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
13. Has reason really been tried?
Wed Mar 19, 2014, 01:06 PM
Mar 2014

Has compassion really been tried?

I would argue that neither of them has.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
20. are you sure?
Wed Mar 19, 2014, 01:54 PM
Mar 2014

If you read the fine print.

I believe in Section T4e subsection IV paragraph six line five that it specificially states

"When, and if, the party of the third person (okay, now here you have to go back twelve pages to read that "the party of the third person, going by the username 'hfojvt' on the website Democratic Underground..." although a careful reading would mean you already KNOW that.) argues that something is true, that makes it true."

Although, unless you have children, you may not have read "The Contract". It being a contract every parent is required to sign when a child is born in this universe.

Just FYI, that is how life, the universe and everything is set up.

I'm Zaphod Beeblebrox, baby. Can ya dig it?

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
24. well, lunacy does sell
Wed Mar 19, 2014, 02:34 PM
Mar 2014

but it only sells lunacy.

Kinda like an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind, fighting lunacy with lunacy just makes the whole world insane.

I am trying to stop the insanity. Not feed it.

And one of the ways the rightwing wins. Is that they have a mighty wurlitzer of a RightWing Noise Machine. And one of the things that the RWNM likes to sell to the public is this idea that liberals are nuts.

Makes for an easier sale if it happens to be true, doesn't it?

So pull the cord, make it stop, and get off the crazy train.

Fantastic Anarchist

(7,309 posts)
25. This is my argument to the reactionaries.
Wed Mar 19, 2014, 02:39 PM
Mar 2014

With the added information about the comparison of the rape and pillage by Corporate welfare "people" with that of the combined fraud and abuse by a few individuals taking advantage of the system.

Chico Man

(3,001 posts)
26. Can I say this?
Wed Mar 19, 2014, 03:06 PM
Mar 2014

The quality of DU was much higher before the cheesy MySpace gif meme phenomenon struck. Non-searchability notwithstanding.

tclambert

(11,087 posts)
40. A co-worker once said, "That guy you gave $5 to might just buy drugs with that, you know."
Wed Mar 19, 2014, 04:57 PM
Mar 2014

I wasn't quick enough to say, "Yeah, he might. But you know what else he might buy with it? FOOD!"

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
63. And he might need those drugs.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:55 AM
Mar 2014

A month's prescription of anti-hypertension meds (lopressor) runs $4 at krogers pharmacy. Ditto all sorts of generic drugs people use to stay alive.

Agony

(2,605 posts)
45. YES!
Wed Mar 19, 2014, 07:24 PM
Mar 2014

guilty until proven innocent is the fucking Repukelican world view.

We are better than that. and... we need to frame it this way every time.

DeadLetterOffice

(1,352 posts)
46. It is the assumption in this country that if you are poor
Wed Mar 19, 2014, 07:40 PM
Mar 2014

you are unworthy; your job as a poor person is thus to convince TPTB that you are still in fact a good person, a person deserving of assistance, even though you are poor. We have been this way since we imported the Elizabethan Poor Laws across the pond.
I cannot even begin to imagine what this country would look like if we started with the opposite assumption -- that if you are poor you are deserving of help until and unless you prove otherwise. I'd be a good bit prouder of it, that's for damn sure...

 

nikto

(3,284 posts)
49. Aw, 'cmon, do you think JESUS would agree?
Wed Mar 19, 2014, 08:57 PM
Mar 2014

I know he'd want them to have guns.

But food and shelter?

mountain grammy

(26,623 posts)
56. Of course, of course. There is so much waste of tax money
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 12:17 AM
Mar 2014

mmm thinking of 50 votes to repeal the ACA. I feel it's NEVER a waste of my money when it actually gets to the people and pays for healthcare, food and shelter.

Bernie2016

(28 posts)
69. I agree with this sentiment.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:24 PM
Mar 2014

Disinterest in economic work should not be a reason for poverty to begin with.

Response to Bernie2016 (Reply #69)

 

Token Republican

(242 posts)
76. 1001
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 08:28 AM
Mar 2014

1001 people show up.

You have enough to feed the first 1000.

As luck would have it, 1000 are lazy bums and 1 is someone in need.

The person in need is last on the line.

What now grasshopper?

If we had infinite resources, your premise is valid. But good intentions mixed with lazy bums and scarce resources means those in need will go without.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
77. Your argument assumes that resources are scarce. That isn't the case. It's all a matter of ....
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 09:12 AM
Mar 2014

... priorities.

Answer this please: If we can't afford to educate our children, to heal our sick and tend to our elderly, just what is it the defense budget is defending?

 

Token Republican

(242 posts)
81. Priorities
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 09:53 AM
Mar 2014
... priorities.

Answer this please: If we can't afford to educate our children, to heal our sick and tend to our elderly, just what is it the defense budget is defending?



In this thread, your example of the defense budget would be the lazy bums who waste resources.

Resources are scarce, in the sense they are not unlimited. The tipping point might be 1000 lazy bums, 10,000, 100,000 or a million. Lazy bums can be lazy individuals who play the system or have last name of Corp. or Inc. who play the system a different way.

Screening out Lazy Bum Inc & company is essentially setting priorities to make sure those in need are not deprived of resources by others.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
79. In fact, there isn't. Fraud is actually rare in safety net programs, and most of the fraud ....
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 09:19 AM
Mar 2014

... is perpetrated not by recipients, but by corporations contracted to administer the program.

Republicans, however, would seem to prefer to let thousands of legitimately needy folks starve rather than see one undeserving person get a benefit they don't deserve.

 

badtoworse

(5,957 posts)
80. There ought to be a way to get help to the folks who really need it...
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 09:45 AM
Mar 2014

and still guard against fraud by whoever might perpatrate it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You can call me a bleedin...