Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
Wed Mar 19, 2014, 06:02 PM Mar 2014

Bold prediction: the same people stating that the US and EU would suffer more from

sanctions against Russia than Russia would--usually citing rt.com--if the sanctions intensify, those same folks will then accuse the US and EU of unleashing the shock doctrine and furtively sabotaging Russia's economy via a 'capital strike' to cripple it and punish it for standing up to corporate interests, while also citing rt.com

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
3. The EU would almost certainly suffer more from sanctions.
Wed Mar 19, 2014, 07:12 PM
Mar 2014

At least in the short term. 30% of the EU's natural gas comes from Russia, along with quite a lot of its oil. Sanctions on Russian energy would mean that suddenly the EU has to look elsewhere and compete for Middle Eastern LNG with other coulntries like Japan, and to compete for oil on other markets which will have the result of driving up world oil prices (which WILL affect the USA, probably, since the US is a long way from being self-sufficient in oil). Long-term, the lack of investment and economic development in Russia would be punitive, but the first effects would be felt in the West.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
4. winter is over, and the EU has reserves built up because North America got all of
Wed Mar 19, 2014, 07:14 PM
Mar 2014

Europe's cold air this winter.

Certainly there would be pain for Europe, but right now Russia needs money more than they need Russia's energy.

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
5. Some EU countries have reserves, others don't (there's no overarching energy policy)
Wed Mar 19, 2014, 07:17 PM
Mar 2014

and the construction in a lot of places of gas-fired power stations means year-round demand at higher levels that Norway can't supply on its own (and despite talk of exports there still aren't any moajor LNG shipments from the US).

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
6. Again, sure there would be inconveniences, but Russia can't live without
Wed Mar 19, 2014, 07:20 PM
Mar 2014

money from its energy sales.

Economically, Russia is a cold version of Saudi Arabia. It doesn't have a diversified economy that can take that kind of hit.

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
7. The global economy can probably take the hit of subtracting Russian gas from the equation...
Wed Mar 19, 2014, 07:23 PM
Mar 2014

IF (and this is a big if) the USA steps in to fill the gap with increased LNG exports. The global economy can't take the hit of losing Russian oil, though (the demand vs supply ratio is such that taking ten million barrels a day out of the equation is pretty much guaranteed to trigger major economic contraction and recession in all developed economies as oil prices go back through $150 or $200 a barrel).

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bold prediction: the sam...