General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Is Liberalism Good for Your Health?" Mother Jones (stunning)
Is Liberalism Good for Your Health?By Chris Mooney at Mother Jones
http://www.motherjones.com/print/247291
"SNIP..................
[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
.................SNIP"
frazzled
(18,402 posts)while liberals are rosy stalwarts when it comes to how they report their health.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)G_j
(40,367 posts)[5] on health care programs and general social safety net programs. And those policies work, or at least mostly work; hence, their populations are indeed healthier. "We're definitely talking about the election of Democrats leading to better health outcomes because they adopt policies designed to lead to the better well being of individuals," says Herian. (Conservatives: Before you cite the Oregon Medicaid study [6] to claim that these types of program don't actually work to make people healthier, see here.
mike_c
(36,281 posts)...but I'm willing to bet those residuals are not Gaussian, LOL. In both that and the sick days graph, there is a much wider spread among the data points for conservative states. I wonder whether the analysis was performed on these raw data or whether the scores were transformed to reduce the influence of outliers and bring the residuals into line? If so, I'd suspect the trend is much less apparent, maybe not significant at all. It would be nice to see the original data.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)I wonder how "liberalism" is determined.
mike_c
(36,281 posts)...particularly when we focus on the ends of the continuum, i.e. the most conservative and most liberal states. Some of the most conservative states have health scores just as high as those of the most liberal states, like Vermont. In fact, ALL but some of the southeastern conservative states have health scores as good or better than most liberal states, including those New England states that score high on both indices. So the real message, at least of this graph, is that the problem is regional rather than simply political, notwithstanding the role of politics in regional differences. But the states that make the apparent point are in the deep south and/or largely rural, with lots of poverty. Every one of them.
obxhead
(8,434 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)TBF
(32,062 posts)if you are an optimistic person who likes change you are probably pretty cheerful in outlook and more likely to vote for liberals. If you are conservative in nature and not as optimistic or enthusiastic for change you might not have as rosy of an outlook and go with the status quo. That sort of seems like common sense.
If they had actual health status or something it might be more indicative but this just strikes me as a silly article. I do like Mother Jones and have used some information repeatedly from there (like the income inequality charts they published a few years ago). This article doesn't seem as thought-provoking to me as some of their others.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)polichick
(37,152 posts)applegrove
(118,675 posts)mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)Conservatism seems to come, in as large part, from fear. For example, the fight against gay rights and now gay marriage is a fear that things will be different - that not everyone follows the same path in marriage, and that acceptance of other people's preferences will somehow destroy their world. With abortion, there's a lot of fear that women won't be stuck with their husbands since they have kids (same goes for birth control). When minorities have rights, not necessarily even equal, that means that white dudes are no longer at the top of the social ladder, and that causes a lot of fear in conservatives.
All that fear, of things changing, of things not being like they were, isn't good for people. I think there's medical evidence for that! But here's the problem: stuff happens. And when stuff happens, it causes things to not be like they were before. that's really kind of how the world works though. People do things, discover stuff, and grow. Evolution kind of demands that people adapt to their environment, discover new things, and alter their environment which forces everyone else to deal with the new environment or face extinction. That probably is the core reason so many always feel like things are going downhill, but it's worse for conservatives.
applegrove
(118,675 posts)others not exactly like you. Then you can cheer their success and luck as the world changes. Then you win more often. Life is happier. You are healthier.
ErikJ
(6,335 posts)According to a recent study, hating is bad for your health! Dr. Charles Raison, associate professor of psychiatry at Emory University School of Medicine and CNNHealths Mental Health expert doctor states bitterness is a nasty solvent that erodes every good thing. So ask yourself one question, do you have hate in your blood? If so, you may be causing more harm to yourself than good.
Raison reasons that in feeling persistently resentful toward other people the boss who told you to chuck the deuces, the girl that cheated on you, the person you envy for whatever reason this can affect your physical health.
In fact, the negative power of feeling bitter is so strong that the authors call for the creation of a new diagnosis called PTED, or post-traumatic embitterment disorder, to describe people who cant forgive others transgressions against them.
Studies have shown that bitter, angry people have higher blood pressure and heart rate and are more likely to die of heart disease and other illnesses.
http://flighered.com/2011/08/19/time-to-stop-hating-its-bad-for-your-health-cnn-reports/
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)for a linear model. I wouldn't be surprised if a higher order interaction with poverty was at work
mike_c
(36,281 posts)Yup.
mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)My boss was sharp as a tack, but very conservative, and I think that came out of fear of failure. That culture of fear, I believe, made people work more conservatively, not trying new things because they might fail. so in the long run, fear, and hence, conservatism, are bad for the company. IMHO.
ErikJ
(6,335 posts)and so more without job-based health insurance. Makes you wonder why Cons defend employer-based health insurance system.
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)Still kind of interesting, though.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)... my State is pretty evenly divided between far-right Walker-backing neanderthals and far-left progressives. We're a lot of things, but "moderate" isn't really one of them.
surrealAmerican
(11,361 posts)It seems to track climate more than political affiliation. Maybe people who live where it's colder just feel healthier than those in high-temperature states.