General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAugusta National’s conundrum: Should the golf club purposely not invite a woman?
By Dan Wetzel, Yahoo! Sports 3 hours, 44 minutes ago
---
The all-male policy is more of an act of defiance. Its the one-percenters getting their chance to push back on society. They keep pretty much everybody out. Women are just one subset. They arent excited about taking in anyone, so adding a fabulously wealthy woman as a member changes little to nothing.
---
This is no longer a choice over whether to invite a woman as a member.
Its now a choice to purposely not invite a woman.
http://sports.yahoo.com/golf/pga/news?slug=dw-wetzel-august-national-masters-women-032812
Is this a case of gender discrimination? What do y'all think they should do?
(Anyone from Occupy Atlanta reading this?)
GopperStopper2680
(397 posts)And while there are probably a handful of Dems and other political alignments in the mix it's going to be primarily GOPS as they represent most of the nation's wealth. They consider women little more than accessories.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)But Augusta National is a private club, which can set its own rules for membership. It was hard enough on these folks to have to let Negros play on their hallowed grounds; letting a woman walk the course as a member and a peer? It would be the end of Civilization to their tiny minds.
The larger question is why the Columbia Broadcasting System feels obliged to kneel before narrow-minded fucks, and afford them top-flight, first-class coverage of their golf tournament. Dress it up however you want, in the prettiest setting you can imagine, but it's still a hard nut of ugly racism and sexism.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)...the sexist bigots that run that club are perfectly within their rights to be that way, there's just no need for the rest of us to care...
niyad
(113,550 posts)was also the moment that I learned to despise tiger wood, who, having broken the colour barrier at augusta, refused to support her.
monmouth
(21,078 posts)on a thin branch there and didn't dare open his mouth. Jack Nicklaus got Tiger through a lot of barriers and was a constant adviser in the early years of Tiger's playing the PGA.
niyad
(113,550 posts)turned out I had his character dead on.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)she's been jumping ugly with Hootie (Johnson) and the Blowhards at Augusta national over this for years.
wilt the stilt
(4,528 posts)of the majors. It is elitist to the max. I like the U.S. Open. These people make me sick. Lee Trevino never went into the clubhouse. He changed his shows in the parking lot. he knew that they thought of him as a groundskeeper. Deep down you know it killed them when tiger won.
monmouth
(21,078 posts)bluestate10
(10,942 posts)The winner becomes a member, just like men winners of the Masters.
Kingofalldems
(38,474 posts)She would become just like the members.
Neue Regel
(221 posts)From the article:
...To suggest it is outwardly hostile to women is a stretch, though. There are women everywhere. They can play as guests. They hang out as spouses.
Women can play at Augusta, but they can't be members.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)bastion of whatever they think they are. To pretend they are anything else would be ludicrous. And the female CEO should ignore the club, except to make a public comment, if asked. Much the way Obama handles the overt racism against him. He continues doing an excellent job, and handles the racism with class and makes the racists all the more petty and backward.
It's a private club, so they can refuse to allow whoever they want to as members, whether Jewish or female or Af. American. It's their club. I'm just disappointed that Buffet is a member.
GobBluth
(109 posts)Obviously I don't ever see a day when I could even afford to be a member, but in general I really wouldn't be against certain things (like signs saying they won't serve such and such), as it just tells me where NOT to spend my money.