Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(72,022 posts)
Wed Apr 30, 2014, 09:57 AM Apr 2014

Scientific American Editor: Fox Told Me I Couldn't Talk About Climate Change

An editor with Scientific American magazine said Wednesday he was shot down by a Fox News producer when he said he wanted to talk about the impacts of climate change.

Michael Moyer appeared on "Fox & Friends" on Wednesday morning to talk about tech trends for the next decade. He tweeted that he suggested the number one trend for the future would be climate change impact but was told to choose another topic instead.

Michael Moyer @mmoyr
Follow
Fox & Friends producer wanted to talk about future trends. I said #1 will be impacts of climate change. I was told to pick something else.
5:41 AM - 30 Apr 2014


http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/scientific-american-editor-fox-news-climate-change
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Scientific American Editor: Fox Told Me I Couldn't Talk About Climate Change (Original Post) kpete Apr 2014 OP
oops RainDog Apr 2014 #1
It's like sex. If you don't talk about it, the kids will never find out! Scuba Apr 2014 #2
What do you mean "find out"? Are you intimating that there is more to rhett o rick Apr 2014 #6
Well, there are something like ten different sexes . . . tclambert Apr 2014 #10
He should have refused to go on Ex Lurker Apr 2014 #3
he should have waited till the last second, then walked. spanone Apr 2014 #4
Precisely malaise Apr 2014 #7
Like mentioning the conspiracy of Nov. 22, 1963. Octafish Apr 2014 #5
Climate change is real, CTs on JFK are not, wow, unbelievable! nt Logical Apr 2014 #12
When it comes to the assassination of JFK, you don't know what you're talking about, Logical. Octafish Apr 2014 #13
No thanks, I have read enough to know lee Harvey acted alone. nt Logical Apr 2014 #14
So, you know all there is to know in your own mind. Octafish Apr 2014 #15
I have read your 100s of JFK posts. Makes me realize how correct I am. CTs <> Facts! nt Logical Apr 2014 #16
So, can you show me where I'm wrong? Octafish Apr 2014 #18
Keep attending the seminars. They need your support. nt Logical Apr 2014 #20
Every program on national television that aired during the 50th anniversary said ''Oswald did it.'' Octafish Apr 2014 #22
This is not at all surprising. nt City Lights Apr 2014 #8
So did he toe the line? Orsino Apr 2014 #9
If nobody talks about it, bvar22 Apr 2014 #11
Can't p*ss off the Koch Brothers, you know...nt joeybee12 Apr 2014 #17
Then decline the interview. Johonny Apr 2014 #19
Climate change was definitley part of the conversation at a fire scene nadinbrzezinski Apr 2014 #21
 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
6. What do you mean "find out"? Are you intimating that there is more to
Wed Apr 30, 2014, 10:52 AM
Apr 2014

the s word than male and female? That my folks hid something from me? I am married with two children. I think my wife has some explaining to do.

tclambert

(11,087 posts)
10. Well, there are something like ten different sexes . . .
Wed Apr 30, 2014, 12:50 PM
Apr 2014

several of which have nothing to do with reproduction.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
13. When it comes to the assassination of JFK, you don't know what you're talking about, Logical.
Wed Apr 30, 2014, 01:52 PM
Apr 2014

JFK was killed by a conspiracy and elements of the CIA seem to have played a big role. Learn about it here and here.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
15. So, you know all there is to know in your own mind.
Wed Apr 30, 2014, 05:35 PM
Apr 2014

Which, as it goes, must be most reassuring.

If you were interested in developing some new ideas, let alone learning the latest, you would read.

Otherwise, you aren't in an informed position needed to make a judgment.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
18. So, can you show me where I'm wrong?
Wed Apr 30, 2014, 07:09 PM
Apr 2014

If you had the facts, you'd show me. But you don't.

I don't know everything, even probably most, of what there is to know when it comes to the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy, his brother, once Attorney General and later Sen. Robert F. Kennedy, and that of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. RFK's kids said their father called the Warren Report "shoddy workmanship" and suspected a conspiracy.

One thing I do know: The assassinations of these three liberal, progressive leaders changed the course of the nation and the planet. Don't believe me or too lazy to read? Then look around: Today -- the richest time in human history -- money trumps peace and progress.




Octafish

(55,745 posts)
22. Every program on national television that aired during the 50th anniversary said ''Oswald did it.''
Wed Apr 30, 2014, 07:56 PM
Apr 2014

Not a single "special" documentary that aired on ABC, NBC, CBS or Fox said otherwise. It was odd, especially considering all that's been learned in the past 50 years.

So, who do you think is telling the truth? The mass media or the academics and experts I heard speak at Duquesne, some of whom have devoted 50 years of their lives in search of the truth -- many investigating the assassination of President Kennedy on behalf of the federal government; or the corporate controlled mass media who lie America into war, protect war criminals and allow all manner of treason in government and corruption by the 1-percent to pass unmentioned, uninvestigated and unpunished?




Johonny

(20,890 posts)
19. Then decline the interview.
Wed Apr 30, 2014, 07:12 PM
Apr 2014

If you can't talk honestly and freely on the subject due to their restrictions then the ethical thing to do is to decline the interview.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
21. Climate change was definitley part of the conversation at a fire scene
Wed Apr 30, 2014, 07:19 PM
Apr 2014

yesterday. And it was not denial either.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Scientific American Edito...