Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

raccoon

(31,111 posts)
Mon May 19, 2014, 10:04 AM May 2014

Geologic time--can us ordinary humans really "get it?"

I wonder if anyone, even paleontologists and geologists, can really comprehend geologic time.

I was listening to a paleontology lecture last night, and he got into talking about deep time. He used the analogy of a year—you’ve probably heard a version of that one—here’s two:

http://www.smithlifescience.com/GeologicTimeComparisons.htm
http://www.uky.edu/KGS/education/geologictimescale.pdf

He also used the example of, estimating 23 years to a generation, in 7 million years there would be 300,000 generations.

But I still can’t really “get” it—and I wonder if anyone does. Just like when you’re talking about enormous sums of money, it just doesn’t register.

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Geologic time--can us ordinary humans really "get it?" (Original Post) raccoon May 2014 OP
If religion didn't exist it would probably be easier for the masses... snooper2 May 2014 #1
Never mind the 1st 5 seconds, what about the 1st 10-31 seconds? muriel_volestrangler May 2014 #19
Never loan money to a geologist. safeinOhio May 2014 #2
Laugh! Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2014 #4
Humans just aren't capable of really understanding such numbers. Kurska May 2014 #3
Our version of time is very human centric The2ndWheel May 2014 #5
The Australian native people might be able to. Aristus May 2014 #6
Putting Time In Perspective frogmarch May 2014 #7
Thanks for the links. nt raccoon May 2014 #8
I have...but it took me many decades to be honest nadinbrzezinski May 2014 #9
Watching Cosmos as a teen, and now Cosmos redux, and you still think this is a photograph.... Brother Buzz May 2014 #21
What difference does my "getting it" make? Romulox May 2014 #10
It is quite humbling nadinbrzezinski May 2014 #11
No more so than the enormity of space. Or the microcosm of life in a drop of water. Romulox May 2014 #12
Correct. I find science both amazing and humbling nadinbrzezinski May 2014 #14
There is no time for infinity seveneyes May 2014 #13
High school seniors two weeks before graduation understand it just fine. nt hack89 May 2014 #15
Start small...and it becomes easier to comprehend large numbers. DreamGypsy May 2014 #16
It's hard to grasp, but it does show the ridiculousness of religion's emphasis on the last 2,000 yrs Arugula Latte May 2014 #17
On an academic level I can recognize the numbers as such, but on a personal level... LanternWaste May 2014 #18
No more than I can comprehend the scale of the universe theHandpuppet May 2014 #20
 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
1. If religion didn't exist it would probably be easier for the masses...
Mon May 19, 2014, 10:21 AM
May 2014

Outside of that, time on Earth since it's beginning is pretty easy to understand.

Imagining what happened within the first 5 seconds, then, the first 5 minutes after the big bang gets a little hard to wrap your mind around

muriel_volestrangler

(101,319 posts)
19. Never mind the 1st 5 seconds, what about the 1st 10-31 seconds?
Mon May 19, 2014, 04:48 PM
May 2014
In physical cosmology, cosmic inflation, cosmological inflation, or just inflation is the expansion of space in the early universe at a rate much faster than the speed of light. The inflationary epoch lasted from 10−36 seconds after the Big Bang to sometime between 10−33 and 10−32 seconds. Following the inflationary period, the universe continues to expand, but at a slower rate.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflation_%28cosmology%29


So that's a universe with fundamentally different things happening, in the first million trillion trillionth of a second. But that was over 10 billion years ago.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
4. Laugh!
Mon May 19, 2014, 10:36 AM
May 2014

I can't believe I never heard that one! (Did a bachelor's and a PhD in geology Didn't stay in the field, though, so I won't be able to pass it along to anyone.

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
3. Humans just aren't capable of really understanding such numbers.
Mon May 19, 2014, 10:28 AM
May 2014

They are completely outside of the realm of our everyday existence.

I guess it strikes to the heart of "can you really understand completely, that which you have never experience?".

The2ndWheel

(7,947 posts)
5. Our version of time is very human centric
Mon May 19, 2014, 10:38 AM
May 2014

Sun centric. A day is one rotation of the planet. A year is once around the sun. Well, how far does that get you?

Earth is 4.5 billion years old. From our perspective of time. Which probably doesn't mean much if you're sitting outside the galaxy somewhere.

We've tried to measure time, label time. We've also taken it upon ourselves to call a horse a horse, even though it's not really a horse of course.

I would say we can't "get it", as there's nothing to get, which is why we've attempted to control it, because we can't understand it.

Aristus

(66,379 posts)
6. The Australian native people might be able to.
Mon May 19, 2014, 10:45 AM
May 2014

As possibly the oldest still existing culture on Earth (some estimates have aboriginal culture going back 35,000 years!...), they can appreciate numbers that can't quite fit in the human head.

They have a term, Dream Time, that refers either to a time period parallel to our own in which the gods exist, or to a time so far back, there's really only a dim, hazy race-memory of it.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
9. I have...but it took me many decades to be honest
Mon May 19, 2014, 11:11 AM
May 2014

I guess watching cosmos when I was a teen, and the cosmic clock...

Why I consider my time on earth, and it have heard this from geologists too, pretty insignificant. I also know that while SoCal is due to a major (read 8.0 or above) quake, since we are talking geologic time I will likely miss it, but be ready for it.

My time in earth is such a minuscule span in these wider expanse of time, that quite brutally honest there is no measurement for it.

Those crazy amounts of money, on the other hand, I have sort of a concept, but that is because I work with state and local budgets. They are actually available. So starting to wrap my mind around them, though I am no expert.

Brother Buzz

(36,436 posts)
21. Watching Cosmos as a teen, and now Cosmos redux, and you still think this is a photograph....
Mon May 19, 2014, 05:40 PM
May 2014

taken by a deep space satellite? If one stopped and thought about time and distance, one would wonder how they get a camera 100,000 light years out there, and then get the image back.



http://sync.democraticunderground.com/10024594344
http://sync.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4605617

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
12. No more so than the enormity of space. Or the microcosm of life in a drop of water.
Mon May 19, 2014, 11:23 AM
May 2014

Existence is as indescribable and unimaginable right now as it will be in some impossibly distant future...

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
14. Correct. I find science both amazing and humbling
Mon May 19, 2014, 11:28 AM
May 2014

But if you are into cosmology, I think of geologic time as it's little brother.

DreamGypsy

(2,252 posts)
16. Start small...and it becomes easier to comprehend large numbers.
Mon May 19, 2014, 01:29 PM
May 2014

Try something easy, like 10. You can count to 10 in a single breath, something like 3 seconds. Counting to a 100 is under a minute, but probably requires a couple breaths (at least for me). Larger numbers are harder to actually count, since you need to "say" words like two hundred forty seven thousand six hundred and seventy eight - but just imagine you could "say" any number in a second. Modern computers can perform hundreds of trillions of operations per second, so it's not too hard to imagine that the human brain can add 1 to a previously computed number and 'say' the result.

Now, counting 300,000 generations of hominin ancestors is now pretty easy - takes just 83.3333 hours. Or you could restrict the count to genus Homo and only have to count to 85,714, under a day (23.4444 hours). Note, the generation times for bacteria (in the lab) can be as little as 12 minutes, so 300,000 generations could actually happen in ~7 years.

Lots of people are lucky enough to live a billion seconds - that's 32 years, 249 days, 1 hour, 46 minutes and 40 seconds. So, one can conceive (I think) of counting to a billion or a couple billion. Yeah, you have to figure in some downtime for eating, sleeping, and stuff like that, but at least it's imaginable.

The earth is estimated at 4.54 billion years old, so 148.38 years are required to count its age. The oldest authenticated human lived 122 years, 164 days. And the universe, 14.77 billion years, 482.71 years to count it. So, the counting methods starts to break down.

31,682 years to count to a trillion, so grasping the ~trillion solar neutrinos that pass through our bodies every second is difficult to "get". And the ~100 trillion cells in our bodies, 90 trillion being bacteria....whew.



 

Arugula Latte

(50,566 posts)
17. It's hard to grasp, but it does show the ridiculousness of religion's emphasis on the last 2,000 yrs
Mon May 19, 2014, 01:35 PM
May 2014

It's so moronically myopic. The past two millennium have been a blip of a blip of a blip of the vast span of time.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
18. On an academic level I can recognize the numbers as such, but on a personal level...
Mon May 19, 2014, 01:40 PM
May 2014

On an academic level I can recognize the numbers as such, but on a personal level it's really rather difficult for me to penetrate the true depths of such large sums.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Geologic time--can us ord...