Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGeorgia court upholds law concealing execution drug sources
Source: Reuters
Georgia court upholds law concealing execution drug sources
BY DAVID BEASLEY
ATLANTA Mon May 19, 2014 2:35pm EDT
(Reuters) - Georgia's law shielding the identity and methods of companies that make its lethal injection drugs is constitutional and should not prevent death row inmate Warren Lee Hill from being executed, the state's Supreme Court ruled on Monday.
Justices in a 5-2 vote lifted the stay of execution granted to Hill by a lower court after he challenged the 2013 law permitting the source of lethal injection drugs to be concealed from the public, attorneys and judges in court proceedings.
In upholding the state law, the Georgia Supreme Court ruled that, without confidentiality, there was "a significant risk that persons and entities necessary to the execution would become unwilling to participate."
The dissenting justices said they worried the secrecy could lead to more botched executions similar to what happened last month in Oklahoma, which also does not disclose its drug sources.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
BY DAVID BEASLEY
ATLANTA Mon May 19, 2014 2:35pm EDT
(Reuters) - Georgia's law shielding the identity and methods of companies that make its lethal injection drugs is constitutional and should not prevent death row inmate Warren Lee Hill from being executed, the state's Supreme Court ruled on Monday.
Justices in a 5-2 vote lifted the stay of execution granted to Hill by a lower court after he challenged the 2013 law permitting the source of lethal injection drugs to be concealed from the public, attorneys and judges in court proceedings.
In upholding the state law, the Georgia Supreme Court ruled that, without confidentiality, there was "a significant risk that persons and entities necessary to the execution would become unwilling to participate."
The dissenting justices said they worried the secrecy could lead to more botched executions similar to what happened last month in Oklahoma, which also does not disclose its drug sources.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/05/19/us-usa-georgia-execution-idUSBREA4I0K220140519
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 507 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Georgia court upholds law concealing execution drug sources (Original Post)
Eugene
May 2014
OP
Renew Deal
(81,861 posts)1. Their names will be known
And I don't think it will take very long.
Orrex
(63,215 posts)2. Couldn't they simply inject bleach purchased from the local grocery store?
Under this secrecy-uber-alles ruling, why wouldn't the executioners use whatever chemical that they can get their hands on? How might someone find out?
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)3. What's wrong with Old Sparky?
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)4. No S41t?
In upholding the state law, the Georgia Supreme Court ruled that, without confidentiality, there was "a significant risk that persons and entities necessary to the execution would become unwilling to participate."
Here's a hint - when people want to hide their involvement in something, it's probably because they realize it's something they shouldn't be involved in, and they don't want to deal with the backlash from other people reacting to their involvement. In the case of businesses, losing customers who don't want to be associated with people who treat their workers poorly, or in this case, supply drugs to kill people.