Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasProgresive

(12,157 posts)
Thu May 29, 2014, 07:28 AM May 2014

Rabies from a red tail hawk??!!

There was a piece on the news this morning about a Brooklyn woman who has red tail hawks nesting on her balcony. She was attacked by one of the birds and was treated for her wounds with antibiotics, tetanus shot and RABIES shots.

Rabies shots are extremely painful. Why would they put her through that ordeal from a bird attack-rabies is a mammal disease?

Maybe doctors in New York City think all animals are alike.

Edited to add link:
http://7online.com/news/brooklyn-woman-attacked-by-red-tailed-hawk/80317/

26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rabies from a red tail hawk??!! (Original Post) TexasProgresive May 2014 OP
Rabies shots JanMichael May 2014 #1
2 people I know received Rabies shots TexasProgresive May 2014 #16
Wounds are not in any circumstance "irrigated" with rabies vaccine. kestrel91316 Jun 2014 #18
Makes ZERO sense to me. Birds are not known to transmit rabies. kestrel91316 Jun 2014 #19
Apparently they've come up with a newer rabies treatment. Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2014 #2
They aren't JanMichael May 2014 #3
Sounds like Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2014 #4
I think the treatment is getting more JanMichael May 2014 #8
Abdominal series of injections ended decades ago. hlthe2b May 2014 #10
For us city folks Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2014 #12
:( Yes, it is JanMichael May 2014 #15
Oh we've still got plenty of wildlife around. Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2014 #17
Rabies is a significant concern here in Los Angeles due to our kestrel91316 Jun 2014 #21
Our programs tend to be more Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #24
Native populations may have more rabies risk than us in the cities. It's about the kestrel91316 Jun 2014 #25
The "newer" rabies post-exposure protocol is now over 30 years old. kestrel91316 Jun 2014 #20
Showing my age Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #23
Maybe it'll teach her not to get near a raptor's nest. hobbit709 May 2014 #5
Reminds me of something that happened to me madokie May 2014 #11
CDC website must be something they don't consult... Historic NY May 2014 #6
This is a good question for Kestrel JanMichael May 2014 #7
+1 hedgehog May 2014 #14
Only mammals carry rabies. So, there is something very wrong with this reporting. hlthe2b May 2014 #9
That's what I was thinking-- the report got it wrong. TreasonousBastard May 2014 #13
Thanks for picking up the slack for me with this! kestrel91316 Jun 2014 #22
Birds of prey feast on vector animals Warpy Jun 2014 #26

JanMichael

(24,890 posts)
1. Rabies shots
Thu May 29, 2014, 07:47 AM
May 2014

are not "extremely painful." We were both treated (exposure to a bat) less than 9 months ago with the full series.

The old "shots in the stomach" routine isn't used anymore.

Maybe the doctor thought the bird could have attacked an animal that was carrying the virus- who knows. However, if there were any chance at all the person could have been exposed, they needed to be treated.

It's not that big of a deal anymore. I know that there was a person on here who was pretty dramatic about the treatment- but, we had to come to the conclusion that he or she has a fear of needles, or a very low pain tolerance for shots. The globulin shots on the first day are no worse than those old penicillin shots we used to get as kids- probably less painful-

TexasProgresive

(12,157 posts)
16. 2 people I know received Rabies shots
Thu May 29, 2014, 09:16 AM
May 2014

The pain wasn't from the injections so much but the doctors irrigated the wounds with the vaccine. That according to the patients was excruciating. Maybe that procedure is not standard, I don't know.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
18. Wounds are not in any circumstance "irrigated" with rabies vaccine.
Thu Jun 19, 2014, 12:59 AM
Jun 2014

On Day One injectable immunoglobulin is infiltrated around the wound(s). Pretty painful from what I've been told, but it's only one time.

The followup vaccine injections are trivial.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
19. Makes ZERO sense to me. Birds are not known to transmit rabies.
Thu Jun 19, 2014, 01:01 AM
Jun 2014
http://www.nasphv.org/Documents/RabiesCompendium.pdf

I have not seen any confirmed reports of rabies in any avian species, but I do have a vague recollection of a raptor or vulture somewhere having rabies a couple of decades ago.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
2. Apparently they've come up with a newer rabies treatment.
Thu May 29, 2014, 07:48 AM
May 2014

I had always heard how horrible rabies shots were too, but recently stumbled across something that made me look around a bit. Instead of the 20-30 horribly painful shots in the stomach I'd always heard about, the newer rabies vaccine is only 4 much less painful IM shots. (IM = intramuscular, aka you can get it in the deltoid muscle of the shoulder, for instance.)

As to why they decided she needed it for a bird attack, no idea.

JanMichael

(24,890 posts)
3. They aren't
Thu May 29, 2014, 07:52 AM
May 2014

it's 2 shots of globulin in the muscle or near the wound (those are the painful ones- like I wrote above, kind of like the penicillin shots 30 years ago- ouch!)-- then two rabies vaccines in the deltoid muscle of the arm-

Then once a week for a month, you get a booster rabies vaccine that didn't hurt at all- took less than 10 seconds to get-

Really- it's not a big deal.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
4. Sounds like
Thu May 29, 2014, 07:59 AM
May 2014

different facilities are using different ways to split up the doses, or else the website I checked was slightly out of date on how they're administering it. But no matter how you slice it, it's a lot better than it used to be.

JanMichael

(24,890 posts)
8. I think the treatment is getting more
Thu May 29, 2014, 08:18 AM
May 2014

standardized. There probably are ways to split up the dosages- but, like you wrote- either way, the treatment is NOT the horror it used to be. It's scarier to think of getting rabies than it is getting a couple of pain in the butt (or thigh- or where ever the bite is) shots-

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
12. For us city folks
Thu May 29, 2014, 09:09 AM
May 2014

rabies isn't a high priority. Until the last month or so, I don't think I'd heard rabies mentioned in decades.

JanMichael

(24,890 posts)
15. :( Yes, it is
Thu May 29, 2014, 09:14 AM
May 2014

We had a bat in the house- We are within half a mile of the center of a large city, and a nationally known university.

Bats, raccoons etc- city dwelling wildlife carries rabies. I think it's just getting more press now that the internet social forums have exploded.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
17. Oh we've still got plenty of wildlife around.
Thu May 29, 2014, 09:23 AM
May 2014

I just never hear about anyone ever getting it. And I suppose one of the vaccinations my dogs get every year or two is probably a rabies shot, come to think of it.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
21. Rabies is a significant concern here in Los Angeles due to our
Thu Jun 19, 2014, 01:07 AM
Jun 2014

perpetual AND INCREASING problem with bat rabies.

If you haven't heard about it, you aren't keeping up with public health and zoonoses. With a BSN, you should be.

http://www.nasphv.org/Documents/RabiesCompendium.pdf

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/jeanna-giese-rabies-survivor/

http://www.cdc.gov/rabies/

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
24. Our programs tend to be more
Thu Jun 19, 2014, 07:17 AM
Jun 2014

focused locally regionally than nationally, and although we were encouraged to consider other areas, I looked more into public health issues facing Native populations rather than those facing large urban hubs...

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
25. Native populations may have more rabies risk than us in the cities. It's about the
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 07:53 PM
Jun 2014

exposure to wildlife reservoirs of the virus.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
20. The "newer" rabies post-exposure protocol is now over 30 years old.
Thu Jun 19, 2014, 01:03 AM
Jun 2014

Nobody in any industrialized country has used the 21 injections of duck embryo vaccine in the abdominal musculature in decades. It is completely obsolete and has been replaced by a much shorter, cheaper, less painful, and vastly more effective human-derived vaccine.

http://www.nasphv.org/Documents/RabiesCompendium.pdf

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
23. Showing my age
Thu Jun 19, 2014, 07:13 AM
Jun 2014

and the fact that none of my nursing classes ever talked about rabies vaccines, nor did I ever talk to anyone at any of the hospitals or clinics I was in. It's just darn rare around where I am, so no one ever really talks about it.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
11. Reminds me of something that happened to me
Thu May 29, 2014, 09:02 AM
May 2014

Over at our home place I was walking in the woods looking for mushrooms when I went under a tree that had a red tail hawk nest in it. the nest was maybe 15 feet from the ground. Anyways as I was concentrating on looking for some mushrooms the male red tail came down and took his talons and scratched my head like you would if you were scratching your head. While doing this he was also slapping my shoulders with his wings. Needless to say I got the hell out of there. I knew that the red tails had built a nest in that tree in years prior but didn't give it any thought that day. You can bet that any time I'm down in the holler now I steer clear of that oak tree. My brother was telling me the other day that they have a nest in the same tree again this year. We also have a pair of owls that nest in that holler every year too.

Historic NY

(37,451 posts)
6. CDC website must be something they don't consult...
Thu May 29, 2014, 08:06 AM
May 2014

Birds, snakes, and fish are not mammals, so they can´t get rabies and they can´t give it to you.

http://www.cdc.gov/rabiesandkids/animals.html

JanMichael

(24,890 posts)
7. This is a good question for Kestrel
Thu May 29, 2014, 08:16 AM
May 2014

She's a veterinarian and gave us great advice after we were exposed.

Perhaps the doctor that treated this woman thought there was a chance that the hawk had just killed a mammal with rabies, and there was the chance that it could have transferred through blood on it's talons. OR maybe he couldn't be sure her story was true, and treated her because it looked like a dog attack?

I don't know, but I do know that passing on a few shots is stupid considering the alternative. If our doc recommended that, we would have gone for the treatment- and not depended on internet information to possibly save our lives.

We had no visible bites from the bat- I questioned whether we really needed the rabies shots for about 30 seconds.

hlthe2b

(102,292 posts)
9. Only mammals carry rabies. So, there is something very wrong with this reporting.
Thu May 29, 2014, 08:38 AM
May 2014

FWIW, rabies post exposure treatment consists of an injection of antibody rich serum and four doses of rabies vaccine given days 0, 3, 7, and 14 given in the arm, typically, while the antibody (immuneglobulin) serum is usually infiltrated around the bite or in muscle distant from the vaccine injection site.

These are no more painful than any other vaccine. The old abdominal series of injections, to which the OP refers ended decades ago. Those, of course were more painful.
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr5902.pdf

Warpy

(111,277 posts)
26. Birds of prey feast on vector animals
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 08:35 PM
Jun 2014

and the northeast part of the country has had epidemic rabies for decades.

I'd insist on the rabies shots. Yes, the hawk could be a carrier via fresh blood on beak or talons.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rabies from a red tail ha...