General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe 13 Most Bizarre Things from Edward Snowden’s NBC News Interview
Bob Cesca
<...>
3) Snowden said that no one has been harmed by his disclosures. Yet. Already, though, one of his documents escalated tensions between Australia and Indonesia, and another document endangered lives in Afghanistan to the point where Greenwald refused to publish the name of that country. Its only a matter of time, sadly.
4) Early on, Snowden said, Im not a spy. Later he famously confessed to being trained as a spy. Huh?
5) Snowden said he destroyed his documents before going to Russia. This is really strange. I have no idea whether he really destroyed his NSA files, but he did in fact meet with Russian officials in Hong Kong, when he reportedly celebrated his birthday at the Russian consulate. Did he still have his documents at that point? Earlier, he said his goal was to fly to Latin America, so why did he anticipate being in Russia to the point where he destroyed his documents to prevent Russians from acquiring them? These are all follow-up questions that a journalist who was informed about the details of Snowdens timeline wouldve asked. Williams was not and therefore did not.
6) NSA can absolutely turn on your iPhone, which is pretty scary. This section was like whiplash. Snowden started out by sounding reasonable by defining that NSA only acquires data when targeting drug dealers or terrorists. And then, BLAM!, this shitola about NSA being able to turn on your phone. If true, why hasnt this been disclosed from Snowdens NSA documents?
<...>
9) Snowden didnt deny turning over secrets that would be damaging or harmful. He only said journalists have a deal with him not to do it. Just a reminder: we really have no idea how many reporters or organizations have copies of the documents or the total number of documents (its a Greenwald/Snowden secret), but we do know that Snowden documents have been reported by so many publications that the question arises: who doesnt have Snowden documents?
- more -
http://thedailybanter.com/2014/05/13-bizarre-things-edward-snowdens-nbc-news-interview/
BeyondGeography
(39,374 posts)I am charging my iPhone right now. Please don't turn it on.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)What do you think all those "butt calls" are about? Be afraid, very afraid. It's not your friend's corduroy pants you're hearing swishing around the aisle in the Stop 'n Shop. It's the NSA, and they've turned on his phone to SPY ON YOU.
BeyondGeography
(39,374 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Unfortunately for the pro-Comrade Eddie crowd, this was all Snowden's doing. Not a single instance where the NSA violated the law, not a single piece of evidence that he attempted to inform superiors of wrongdoing, yet he admits to committing serious crimes against the security of his home nation.
Yeah, that'll play well in Peoria.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)sofa king
(10,857 posts)4) There are a million Americans "trained as spies."
Most of them--almost all of them, in fact--do not spy on the United States.
No contradiction there, except that the circumstantial evidence overwhelmingly points to the fact that Snowden in particular was carrying water for the Chinese.
One can easily see this in the character of the disclosures made by Snowden and Greenwald: virtually all of the disclosures confirmed some assertion previously made by Greenwald himself.
That means that the Chinese kept all of the new and useful information they got out of Snowden during his months-long debriefing.
He's a fucking spy, and I caution all of you not to stick your asses too far out on Snowden's branch. We may applaud the results, but Snowden is no Daniel Ellsberg.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"He's a fucking spy, and I caution all of you not to stick your asses too far out on Snowden's branch. We may applaud the results, but Snowden is no Daniel Ellsberg. "
...note this admission.
blm
(113,065 posts)Last edited Thu May 29, 2014, 11:16 AM - Edit history (2)
Who has kept a tight grip on US-China relations since the 70s? Poppy Bush. He has also kept a tight grip on an elite circle at the CIA who only work for the BFEE.
Snowden was their dupe. Jeb2016, because...See...Obama is no different than Bush. The timing also coincided with the Bush Family Name Rehab tour. But...most people tend to not notice those things. Not even on DU.
Bloomberg/July2013:
>>>>>>
A public confrontation with China that appeared to erupt spontaneously this year actually coalesced after significant shifts in U.S. policy and years of internal argument, analysis and vetting, according to two people briefed on the plan who asked not to be identified because they werent authorized to speak on the matter.
Approved by top national security advisers and presented to President Barack Obama in a series of meetings in 2012 and early this year, the plan includes classified counterintelligence operations, the seizure of assets and even the possible indictment of Chinese hackers, those people said.
The U.S. already has privately provided Chinas leaders with evidence it gathered linking the hacks of commercial companies to Chinas intelligence agencies -- a risky demarche that exposed the methods of U.S. spy agencies tracking those activities, according to the two people.
While some elements of the plan are well under way, other parts were intended to be rolled out over the next several months to increase pressure on Chinas leaders.
What the administration didnt anticipate was that a disaffected American would expose some U.S. spying operations as it prepared for Obamas first meeting with Chinas new president.
>>>>>>
And the Bush rehab tour:
http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/a_george_w_bush_comeback/
Pholus
(4,062 posts)It speaks poorly of Bobbie C's cognitive abilities that he cannot separate "receiving training in" from "performing the duties of" something.
But I guess that's why I am smarter than he is.
"Number 4 convincingly demonstrates a pathetic attempt to pad a list."
...it's a valid point.
EXCLUSIVE: Edward Snowden Tells Brian Williams: 'I Was Trained as a Spy'
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025008876
Pholus
(4,062 posts)You can try to spin Herr Bobbie's idiocy all you want but he wrote what he wrote. He admits he doesn't know the simple and obvious difference between training and occupation.
Nor do you, apparently. I guess that just proves that "Sense" and "Logic" are not mutually inclusive things....
"You can try to spin Herr Bobbie's idiocy all you want but he wrote what he wrote. He admits he doesn't know the simple and obvious difference between training and occupation. "
...you can dismiss the fact that Snowden sounded like an idiot and most of his claims were absurd, but that doesn't change the fact that he dug himself into a deeper hole with that interview. I mean, the fool admitted, in his own words, that he took damaging information and distributed it and the only thing he has as a defense is that the recipients promised not to reveal the information.
Pholus
(4,062 posts)The case in point was Herr Bobbie's claims about training and practice being identical.
Now you want to change the topic to Snowden? Deflection. Argue Herr Bobbie's point, if you can (you obviously can't and no blue linkie is going to save you on that point).
You basically posted a puff-piece written by an intellectual lightweight with an axe to grind. Someone so over simplistic they wanted a long list when a concise one would have done. In other words, an amateur.
It completely discredits your entire message.
P.S. You might feel inclined to argue how one detail being used to discredit an entire body of work can be called unfair. Too bad for you. It is called the "boxes in the garage rule" and has been in force since last June. I am kind of sure you are familiar with it...
AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)It is the elephant in the room and nobody taljs about it.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)LOL!
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Trajan
(19,089 posts)Getting rather monotonous ...
These are NOT my favorite DUers ... ridiculous OP ...
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"These are NOT my favorite DUers "
...posted glowing praise of Snowden:
He's a hero. Thank you.
Love,
Vast Majority
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)It has been already shown that he is not being truthful on more than one occasion. Do you believe that he is strategically telling those lies, or something else?
PRETZEL
(3,245 posts)Personally, I believe that what he was most of all was an extremely good "hacker" for the CIA and NSA. His educational history and past work experience leads me to believe that his career has been based on this. Our intelligence community would see Mr. Snowden as a very valuable asset in both gaining access to other countries intelligence data bases as well as in trying to provide security for our own intelligence data bases. It just seemed rather interesting that he knew so much about so many different intelligence data bases in such a short time not to believe that this was his expertise.
What cannot be disputed, at least in my opinion, is the extreme intelligence of Mr. Snowden. Unfortunately, it may also be his own worst enemy. My guess, if he would have come out at first chance and admitted that he was a professional hacker for the US some of the back story about his personal life either being so spy-like as opposed to being more non-descript, the conversation might just be very different.
As to whether he is a whistle blower or not, he is on certain issues, in particular the data mining on American citizens. Where I believe he may not be a whistle blower is in some of the activities the US has done in relation to foreign intelligence gathering that is as unfortunate as I may feel it is, is for the most part necessary as part of our national security.
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)Tsiyu
(18,186 posts)but speaking up about that egregious behavior is the worse sin ever.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"Funny how highly egregious behavior by authorities is tolerated but speaking up about that egregious behavior is the worse sin ever."
...is witnessing the soaring hyperbole being used to define a self-confessed spy who admitted he stole damaging information and distributed it to people who promised not to reveal it...IOW, a fool. LOL!
Tsiyu
(18,186 posts)And if a Republican rather than a Democrat were Prez, you would probably feel the same way.
Transparency is a good thing. When Obama condones so much horrific treatment of the common citizen, in that we are all considered suspects these days, all considered possible terrorists and all subject to intrusive invasions of our privacy, he should expect to be called on it.
Anything less is cowardice from the people.
I appreciate the good Obama has done, but he is no saint and I distrust those who insist on canonizing the man.
"If you've got nothing to hide so what?" is what we've all been sold. Same back atcha, Administration
randome
(34,845 posts)That the NSA has been storing phone metadata since 2007? That the NSA spies on foreign countries? Every country on the planet has penalties for stealing national security documents. Every one.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]A 90% chance of rain means the same as a 10% chance:
It might rain and it might not.[/center][/font][hr]
Tsiyu
(18,186 posts)Sounds like something my kids used to tell me
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)should just declassify everything that is currently classified?
"I would far rather know what my government is up to than not"
...I don't need Snowden's theatrics for that. He shot himself in the foot and his ever-changing message is an attempt to distract from the fact that he's screwed.
I mean, if not for him the debate wouldn't have started on information that was already out there? Maybe, but admitting to stealing damaging information, releasing it and then assuring that it isn't going to be reveal is beyond idiotic. Does he think this helps his case?
Snowden's problem is that he knows damn well he screwed up with his actions overseas. The problem for his fans is that they need to keep hyping the dramatic nature of the information related to domestic surveillance activities to create the impression that he did something other than spark a debate in the U.S.
Snowden's information was already out there. Releasing it here and remaining in the country would have sparked the same debate. Such a debate would have fueled his case for leniency.
His fans don't want to focus on the fact that he admitted to stealing the information that sparked the charges. He's in deep shit, not for the information on domestic activities, but for the information that he admits is out there and still, he claims, hasn't been revealed. On that score, he's not about transparency, he's trying to save his ass.
Erose999
(5,624 posts)he's said some stupid stuff and that he's made some bad decisions that have put his ass in a sling. But it seems like most of Snowden's critics are more worried about the messenger than the message.
I'm not at all happy with the expanding surveillance powers our government has taken upon itself. Considering that our gov't is also claiming the power to detain people indefinitely and even torture them, where does it end? When does to power of the "spooks" ever reach a limit?
Its time to stop pretending all of this "secrecy" is necessary. The CIA, and the NSA should both be defunded and dismantled.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"I agree that he's said some stupid stuff and that he's made some bad decisions that have put his ass in a sling."
...agree, what more is there to say?
Erose999
(5,624 posts)of ALL American citizens, so there's that.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)And all of which anybody who bothered to pay attention and actually read the thing has known since 2005.
So really, your issue is you've climbed on board the "repeal the USA PATRIOT Act" train that most of us have been on for nine years because such a hulabaloo was raised when Snowden released classified documents, some of which documented procedures and processes for them to compile communication information in accordance with the USA PATRIOT Act.
At least we're now on the same page regarding the USA PATRIOT Act. I guess there was some small good to come out of Snowden's heinous crime.
But when I tried to say that at the outset it was like these folks had amnesia and the USA PATRIOT ACT had never happened. I've been on board with wiping that unConstitutional sludge off the books since it was passed in a flaming hurry right after 9-11-2001. That's 13 1/2 years it's been LEGAL.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)Gosh, I remember calls, emails, letters, LTEs and considerable organization here to head it off. I don't get the amnesia for people who were on DU at the time and the unwillingness of others to face the very real fact that this hydra has been around for a while. Were people playing video games or sleeping or what?
Hekate
(90,714 posts)...with every fiber of my being.
Something truly toxic is going on here at DU between the amnesia and the deification of Snowden and GEG, and in that toxicity the president who has been trying to clean up (despite sworn opposition from the Repubs) is being blamed for (a) causing the mess or (b) not waving his magic wand on Day One.
By the way -- the GOP that has spent every day searching for something, anything, to turn into a president-wrecking scandal finally has one: the VA. Yet once again, amnesia reigns here and it's all Obama's/Shinseki's fault, not the Bush Cabal's for wrecking it so badly or the Congress's for failing to fund it adequately. They have their actual scandal at last -- and good men will go down.
What we need now is cool heads and unity of purpose. Anything else will be counterproductive. The BFEE are in it for the long game. They've been playing this one for over a century and now they have the Koch brothers fielding too. I get so frustrated by the insistence on sparkly thing of the day. Still holding out for substance and for meaningful action. I'm not interested in the latest spy novel.
Erose999
(5,624 posts)to every Democratic senator/rep who voted for that nonsense. I think the patriot act and the votes for the war resolutions turned a lot of people away from the party, and into the waiting arms of the Ron Paul cult.
sofa king
(10,857 posts)We knew it right here. Prosense in particular may be too modest to mention it, but he also spotted Greenwald's recycling of old news:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023361622
Here's DU knowing it ten years ago:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=105x871834
Nine years ago:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x179953
Eight years ago:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1116932
Five years ago:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x6037395
This is the point we're trying to make. We knew all of this shit years ago. Then this guy Snowden runs off to Hong Kong about a week after Hillary Clinton mentioned Tienanmen Square, meets with Greenwald, and produces what's basically a re-hash of the reporting that was noted and routinely commented upon right here at DU for ten fucking years. What's most remarkable about it is virtually nothing publicly reported is new.
But Snowden knew a shitload of important things, and spent months in China apparently telling them all about it, exactly as a spy would do.
The important thing here is that this story is going to have a mule-kick of a back end, when it's eventually revealed (probably through Bush stay-behind leakers) that Snowden is, in fact, a spy who played out a Chinese propaganda operation, and then everyone who put their dicks on the block for him--the so-called "liberal" press and many of us here--is gonna get chopped.
I don't want to see that happen to my more emotional but less discerning friends here. This is my major concern.
Hekate
(90,714 posts)karynnj
(59,504 posts)I have seen post after post of people denying that anyone knew anything about the telco records being kept -- and one then went on to claim that they have followed this for years!
Somehow all those DU/Daily Kos things in 2007 and 2008 just didn't happen.
Tsiyu
(18,186 posts)not necessary, but if it helps you categorize and dismiss people, why, you carry on Guvnah
treestar
(82,383 posts)Even if you are making it up. Authorities are bad in themselves. Anyone accusing them must be in the right.
Let's see if Eddie has the gumption to criticizes the authorities in the country he is now in.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Ron is helping his boy Rand become a front runner in the 2016 race. And trying to subvert a backlash against their Koch Libertarian agenda to end Obamacare, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, public schools, the Post Office as part privatizing everything, no worker protection, no minimum wage, and on and on.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024806298
Birds of a feather certainly do flock together. It's going to either be Benghazi, Bundy, eliminate the civil rights for women and all minorities and promote guns in every place, OAS, Oathkeepers, etc.
Yesterday it was Obama, now it's HRC. There is a partisan pattern, huh?
Tsiyu
(18,186 posts)that's gag worthy.
I may be a Democrat, but I don't view any Democrat - including myself - as above criticism.
You all want to demonize the guy have at it.
I shall leave you all to your hate-fest....
treestar
(82,383 posts)Which seem to be the sole purpose of DU for some. As opposed to "authorities." Interesting, because before, it was all authorities who were always bad but now you scaled it back to Democrats.
If we think that the authorities follow the law, we think they are saints. If we don't consider Eddie to be above the law, then we are thinking of the authorities as saints.
Because those we elected to carry out the law and their appointees and the lower level bureaucrats are always corrupt. That excuses Eddie from compliance with the law, or any consequences where he chooses not to follow it.
betsuni
(25,538 posts)The "I was trained as a spy" admission: the screenwriters working on the movie version (these are the James Bond movie people) of the Snowden story were having trouble making a dude sitting in front of a computer machine all the time interesting. But, hey, if he's a "spy" then -- creative license, no problem, exciting things! I think my theory is correct. But ... how will the movie end?
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Glenn Greenwald will be played by Glenn Greenwald and the last 45 minutes of the movie will be a Glenn Greenwald rant as acted by Glenn Greenwald portraying Glenn Greenwald.
Thank you for typing the name out!
freshwest
(53,661 posts)daligirl519
(285 posts)leftyladyfrommo
(18,868 posts)I've never believed he was in this whole thing alone.
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)unless of course he wanted asylum in Russia in the first place.
Because of his actions he provided the opportunity for U.S. adversaries like China and Russia to privately talk with him should raise eyebrows
He is in a country run by Putin, who make no excuse that he wants to bring back elements of the Soviet Union, one of the most suppressive governments known in the 20th century, speaks volumes
Tarheel_Dem
(31,235 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts).....and is pulling things out of his ass here. Unbelievable, literally.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"...and is pulling things out of his ass here. Unbelievable, literally."
That didn't come out of the blogger's "ass."