Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TeamPooka

(24,229 posts)
Thu May 29, 2014, 07:37 PM May 2014

The 5 Worst Things about ex- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer buying The L.A. Clippers

1. The Clippers are no longer compatible with Apple products.
2. The Clippers will now require weekly updates that do nothing.
3. The Clippers will now come bundled with a lot of software you don't want and can't use.
4. The Clippers are now more susceptible to hackers so change their password often.
5. Get ready for Clippers Vista.

Steve Ballmer Wins Bidding for Clippers With $2 Billion Price Tag (Report)

Former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer is to reportedly buy the Los Angeles Clippers for $2 billion.
The news came after weeks of speculation on the fate of the team since Donald Sterling was banned for life from the NBA by commissioner Adam Silver on April 29.
The sale would be the highest ever paid for a NBA team.
Ballmer was chosen over competitors that included Los Angeles-based investors Tony Ressler and Steve Karsh and a group that included David Geffen and executives from the Guggenheim Group, the Chicago-based owner of the Los Angeles Dodgers, according to the Los Angeles Times.
more at link...
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/steve-ballmer-wins-bidding-clippers-708041

35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The 5 Worst Things about ex- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer buying The L.A. Clippers (Original Post) TeamPooka May 2014 OP
SEATTLE-SEATTLE-SEATTLE-SEATTLE-SEATTLE-SEATTLE!!!! nolabear May 2014 #1
There is virtually zero chance he would move the Clippers out of LA. Jenoch May 2014 #2
Yup, and the chances of a team going to (or expansion) Seattle just went down big time itsrobert May 2014 #4
Not competing for entertainment dollars with the Lakers may have advantages. Maedhros May 2014 #10
He will not move the team. former9thward May 2014 #13
Yes - I hadn't considered the enormous sum he paid for the franchise. Maedhros May 2014 #23
tell that to the DonCoquixote May 2014 #35
:) TeamPooka May 2014 #3
Even Ballmer isn't stupid enough to give up the LA market Recursion May 2014 #25
So Sterling is not only an asshole, he is now an even richer asshole...nt joeybee12 May 2014 #5
Assets changed form, from owned to monetary. Maedhros May 2014 #9
Not in this case. Team valuation was a little over $500 million, he is getting $2 Billion. stevenleser May 2014 #28
He might be richer, MicaelS May 2014 #12
He has a billion less out of billions. former9thward May 2014 #14
Yeah, this is not an unhappy time for him. stevenleser May 2014 #33
Steve is HappyHappyHappy DJ13 May 2014 #6
Fouls and airballs will be called General Basketball Failures. Gidney N Cloyd May 2014 #7
404 Player not found TeamPooka May 2014 #18
So Sterling and his wife are going to walk away from this mess with $2 billion profit davidn3600 May 2014 #8
Yes, to answer you succinctly. It's disgusting. stevenleser May 2014 #32
I don't know. I don't follow soccer. nt MineralMan May 2014 #11
Free-throw and three-pointer lines .... dawg May 2014 #15
lol TeamPooka May 2014 #20
Team owner no longer sounds just like a racist version of ... dawg May 2014 #16
And he still cannot dance. nt Mnemosyne May 2014 #17
I kind of miss the old days when owners of Jenoch May 2014 #19
They must have gone away around the same time cities started building stadiums for the teams. TeamPooka May 2014 #21
I don't think that is correct. Jenoch May 2014 #22
The absolute worst thing? Donald Sterling gets nearly $2 BILLION of practically tax free income. Initech May 2014 #24
Yeah, and he bought the team back in the 80s for... GReedDiamond May 2014 #26
Amen to that! Initech May 2014 #27
I'm not an accountant or CPA so can you tell me why this would be tax free? stevenleser May 2014 #29
Because we give huge tax breaks to billionaires? Initech May 2014 #30
I don't think there is enough writeoffs in the world to cover all the capital gains here. stevenleser May 2014 #31
meh Leme May 2014 #34

itsrobert

(14,157 posts)
4. Yup, and the chances of a team going to (or expansion) Seattle just went down big time
Thu May 29, 2014, 07:49 PM
May 2014

When one of the primary person that had the will to do it is now going to own the LA Clippers.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
10. Not competing for entertainment dollars with the Lakers may have advantages.
Thu May 29, 2014, 08:01 PM
May 2014

Seattle would overwhelmingly welcome an NBA franchise.

former9thward

(32,023 posts)
13. He will not move the team.
Thu May 29, 2014, 08:15 PM
May 2014


The businessman said in a recent interview that he had no intention of moving the Clippers. He said that the high valuations for the team only made sense in Los Angeles, the second biggest media market in the country.






http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-sn-clippers-sale-ballmer-20140529-story.html
 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
23. Yes - I hadn't considered the enormous sum he paid for the franchise.
Fri May 30, 2014, 01:14 AM
May 2014

That makes a move less desirable.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
25. Even Ballmer isn't stupid enough to give up the LA market
Fri May 30, 2014, 01:20 AM
May 2014

And the NBA as a whole is overextended into regional markets as it is.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
28. Not in this case. Team valuation was a little over $500 million, he is getting $2 Billion.
Fri May 30, 2014, 01:45 AM
May 2014

I have no idea why Balmer wanted to pay nearly 4 times valuation but then again, I don't have Billions of dollars without any real idea of what to do with it.

MicaelS

(8,747 posts)
12. He might be richer,
Thu May 29, 2014, 08:12 PM
May 2014

But his wife getting half of all that money when she divorces him is going to gnaw at him. And him losing the Clippers is going to gnaw at him like a cancer.

former9thward

(32,023 posts)
14. He has a billion less out of billions.
Thu May 29, 2014, 08:17 PM
May 2014

He is in his mid-80s. I doubt it is going to gnaw on him for a second.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
33. Yeah, this is not an unhappy time for him.
Fri May 30, 2014, 01:59 AM
May 2014

He can probably buy any 3-5 European sports teams now and live in the French or Italian Riviera where no one will know what he did.

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
8. So Sterling and his wife are going to walk away from this mess with $2 billion profit
Thu May 29, 2014, 07:57 PM
May 2014

They only paid $12.5 million when they bought the team.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
32. Yes, to answer you succinctly. It's disgusting.
Fri May 30, 2014, 01:57 AM
May 2014

I'm trying to think about how much public shaming and humiliation I would be willing to endure for $2 Billion.

The answer is, a whole heck of a lot. Even if I hadn't done anything wrong.

dawg

(10,624 posts)
16. Team owner no longer sounds just like a racist version of ...
Thu May 29, 2014, 08:22 PM
May 2014

Master Shake from Aqua Teen Hunger Force.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
19. I kind of miss the old days when owners of
Thu May 29, 2014, 10:35 PM
May 2014

professional sports franchises did not have to be billionaires. I wonder who the last owner was who's only asset was the team and did not have more money invested from outside ventures. I know in Minnesota, Calvin Griffith (another racist owner) owned the Minnesota Twins and that was the family business. They started out as one of the original American League teams in 1901.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
22. I don't think that is correct.
Fri May 30, 2014, 12:38 AM
May 2014

Metropolitan Stadium in Bloomington, Minnesota was built to attract a MLB team, ultimately acquiring the Minnesota Twins in 1961.

Initech

(100,080 posts)
24. The absolute worst thing? Donald Sterling gets nearly $2 BILLION of practically tax free income.
Fri May 30, 2014, 01:18 AM
May 2014

If we want to reduce the deficit the IRS should be circling these sales like vultures.

GReedDiamond

(5,313 posts)
26. Yeah, and he bought the team back in the 80s for...
Fri May 30, 2014, 01:37 AM
May 2014

...a paltry 12 Million $.

Not a bad return on his investment, no?

And, btw, fuck Donald Sterling and anyone else associated with him on the back end of this shit.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
31. I don't think there is enough writeoffs in the world to cover all the capital gains here.
Fri May 30, 2014, 01:55 AM
May 2014

Not being an accountant, I don't know if you count the profit from the $12 million he paid for the team 2+ decades ago versus the $2 Billion or the $500 million valuation of the team versus the $2 Billion, but whichever, he is going to be paying 25% on a lot of money.

 

Leme

(1,092 posts)
34. meh
Fri May 30, 2014, 02:13 AM
May 2014

He had the money and wanted to get into the entertainment business; and those in a monopoly of a corner of that entertainment business chose his money.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The 5 Worst Things about ...