General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe 5 Worst Things about ex- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer buying The L.A. Clippers
1. The Clippers are no longer compatible with Apple products.
2. The Clippers will now require weekly updates that do nothing.
3. The Clippers will now come bundled with a lot of software you don't want and can't use.
4. The Clippers are now more susceptible to hackers so change their password often.
5. Get ready for Clippers Vista.
Steve Ballmer Wins Bidding for Clippers With $2 Billion Price Tag (Report)
Former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer is to reportedly buy the Los Angeles Clippers for $2 billion.
The news came after weeks of speculation on the fate of the team since Donald Sterling was banned for life from the NBA by commissioner Adam Silver on April 29.
The sale would be the highest ever paid for a NBA team.
Ballmer was chosen over competitors that included Los Angeles-based investors Tony Ressler and Steve Karsh and a group that included David Geffen and executives from the Guggenheim Group, the Chicago-based owner of the Los Angeles Dodgers, according to the Los Angeles Times.
more at link...
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/steve-ballmer-wins-bidding-clippers-708041
nolabear
(41,986 posts)Jenoch
(7,720 posts)itsrobert
(14,157 posts)When one of the primary person that had the will to do it is now going to own the LA Clippers.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Seattle would overwhelmingly welcome an NBA franchise.
former9thward
(32,023 posts)The businessman said in a recent interview that he had no intention of moving the Clippers. He said that the high valuations for the team only made sense in Los Angeles, the second biggest media market in the country.
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-sn-clippers-sale-ballmer-20140529-story.html
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)That makes a move less desirable.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)Oklahoma city Thunder.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)And the NBA as a whole is overextended into regional markets as it is.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Meh.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)I have no idea why Balmer wanted to pay nearly 4 times valuation but then again, I don't have Billions of dollars without any real idea of what to do with it.
MicaelS
(8,747 posts)But his wife getting half of all that money when she divorces him is going to gnaw at him. And him losing the Clippers is going to gnaw at him like a cancer.
former9thward
(32,023 posts)He is in his mid-80s. I doubt it is going to gnaw on him for a second.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)He can probably buy any 3-5 European sports teams now and live in the French or Italian Riviera where no one will know what he did.
DJ13
(23,671 posts)Gidney N Cloyd
(19,841 posts)TeamPooka
(24,229 posts)davidn3600
(6,342 posts)They only paid $12.5 million when they bought the team.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)I'm trying to think about how much public shaming and humiliation I would be willing to endure for $2 Billion.
The answer is, a whole heck of a lot. Even if I hadn't done anything wrong.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)dawg
(10,624 posts)replaced with "tiles".
dawg
(10,624 posts)Master Shake from Aqua Teen Hunger Force.
Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)Jenoch
(7,720 posts)professional sports franchises did not have to be billionaires. I wonder who the last owner was who's only asset was the team and did not have more money invested from outside ventures. I know in Minnesota, Calvin Griffith (another racist owner) owned the Minnesota Twins and that was the family business. They started out as one of the original American League teams in 1901.
TeamPooka
(24,229 posts)Jenoch
(7,720 posts)Metropolitan Stadium in Bloomington, Minnesota was built to attract a MLB team, ultimately acquiring the Minnesota Twins in 1961.
Initech
(100,080 posts)If we want to reduce the deficit the IRS should be circling these sales like vultures.
GReedDiamond
(5,313 posts)...a paltry 12 Million $.
Not a bad return on his investment, no?
And, btw, fuck Donald Sterling and anyone else associated with him on the back end of this shit.
Initech
(100,080 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Thanks
Initech
(100,080 posts)That's my guess.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Not being an accountant, I don't know if you count the profit from the $12 million he paid for the team 2+ decades ago versus the $2 Billion or the $500 million valuation of the team versus the $2 Billion, but whichever, he is going to be paying 25% on a lot of money.
He had the money and wanted to get into the entertainment business; and those in a monopoly of a corner of that entertainment business chose his money.