Fine. I'll Say It. WE HAVEN'T EVEN STARTED PRIMARY SEASON YET!

[snooper2]

jeez get off Hillary's pantsuit already LOL....


Methinks we need a new "Hillary Yes/No" group so the pro/anti Hillary obsession crowd can have their fun, alone

[randys1]

1. I dont understand the problem, how could ANYone self described as a liberal or progressive

or Democrat throw away their vote when the alternative is ANY rightwinger alive?

Explain that to me please

[snooper2]

2. nobody outside of 17 random DU'ers on the intertubes and some DC talking heads give a shit

so,

How is the housing market in your area, it is getting CRAZY here in DFW

[CAG]

3. My question is WHY HASN'T CHELSEA CLINTON RELEASED HER MEDICAL RECORDS YET???

I mean, she's only about 24 years away from running for president!!

[MADem]

4. +1 nt

[Dawgs]

5. You know this is political discussion site, right?

Someone of us enjoy discussing shit like this.

[genwah]

6. I AGREE! Can we do November, 2014 first? Please?

[KamaAina]

7. MIDTERMS! MIDTERMS! MIDTERMS!

[RufusTFirefly]

8. Agreed. Joe Lieberman was once the front runner at roughly this point.

And what a swell candidate he was!

Any polling this early is utterly tainted by name recognition.

That said, I think many people who still believe in democracy are worried that the primaries are going to be a fait accompli. Instead of a contest, it will be a coronation. After all, it seems that Wall Street and corporate America believe that they are the king (or queen) makers and that all we can do is choose between two candidates who have been thoroughly pre-screened for corporate friendliness.

Meanwhile, any dissent once the primaries begin will be discouraged by partisans on the grounds that it just weakens our candidate for the general election.

[IronLionZion]

10. Has anyone actually seen Hillary's birth certificate?

the long version?