Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 03:50 AM Jul 2014

Democrats begin to fight back against corporate education policy

The internal war among Democrats over education policy escalated another notch this weekend at the annual convention of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) union in Los Angeles. Delegates savaged the “education reform” agenda as a corporate-led threat to “everything we hold dear.” And three high-profile party stalwarts announced the formation of Democrats for Public Education, to contest the reform agenda with a public-centered alternative. We’re likely to see proxy fights between these opposing forces for years to come.

For many years now, Democrats at the highest levels — including President Obama and his Education Secretary Arne Duncan — have pursued a series of so-called reform policies, which include charter schools, test-based teacher evaluations and eliminations of tenure. The Race to the Top program, where the Education Department forced school policy changes as a condition for competing for additional funding support, engendered a quiet revolution in the classroom. Duncan famously called Hurricane Katrina “the best thing that happened to the education system in New Orleans,” an example of his desire to overhaul school districts and break union power.

Teacher’s unions typically resisted the reformers, but in the end would come back into the Democrats’ fold, perceiving Republicans as worse. Both the AFT and the National Education Association (NEA) endorsed President Obama in 2012. With teachers a substantial part of the Democratic activist base, unions had reasons to downplay the disagreements.

But a ruling out of California became a touchstone, bringing this simmering debate further into the open. In the Vergara case, bankrolled by Silicon Valley elites, a state judge effectively invalidated California’s teacher tenure rule as violating the civil rights of poor students, who cannot have bad teachers jettisoned from their classrooms. The ruling earned praise from Arne Duncan, and Obama Administration alums formed a public relations group to support future copycat lawsuits in other states. Vergara threatens perhaps the core position of teacher’s unions – job security for their members.

http://www.salon.com/2014/07/14/michelle_rhees_minions_meet_their_match_new_anti_charter_group_declares_war/

---------------------

About-goddamn-time!

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democrats begin to fight back against corporate education policy (Original Post) Fearless Jul 2014 OP
du rec. xchrom Jul 2014 #1
"Welcome to the jungle, baby"? What does that mean? Smarmie Doofus Jul 2014 #2
IMHO it means they think public education is in effect a battleground. madfloridian Jul 2014 #6
Kicking. Thank you. nt littlemissmartypants Jul 2014 #3
Yeah sure they are. Like Income Inequality was the, "defining issue of our time" was. Katashi_itto Jul 2014 #4
It is the defining issue of our time Fearless Jul 2014 #5
I was quoting Obama. When the public conversation lasted all of 5 mins. Katashi_itto Jul 2014 #7
 

Smarmie Doofus

(14,498 posts)
2. "Welcome to the jungle, baby"? What does that mean?
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 05:06 AM
Jul 2014

>>>>DFER had a one-line response to the formation of the rival group: “Welcome to the jungle, baby.” How did Donna Brazile respond to that? “I’m not going to respond to misleading half-truths, propaganda and lies from those who want to make public education corporate,” she told Salon. “My mama told me it’s not what they call you, it’s what you answer to. And we’re going to answer by talking up education when it gets talked down.”>>>>

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
6. IMHO it means they think public education is in effect a battleground.
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 02:46 PM
Jul 2014

I know it was a stupid thing to say, but that group is known for stupid anyway.

Public education should be sacred in our country, not a playground for the rich and famous.

My view for what it's worth.

 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
7. I was quoting Obama. When the public conversation lasted all of 5 mins.
Wed Jul 16, 2014, 06:57 AM
Jul 2014

and true. We aren't doing anything about it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Democrats begin to fight ...