General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo What Is The Repubs Reasoning & Their Response For Not Putting Money Into The Infrastructure?..
Granted I know they don't want President Obama to succeed at anything and are blocking everything he proposes or knocking everything he does.
So don't just say they hate Obama and don't want him to succeed. They really can't say that in response to the question of why they are not for upgrading our infrastructure.
What I want to know is what are they saying in response to - why are you not for upgrading our infrastructure? What is their so-called rational reasoning for not supporting infrastructure rebuilding here in America?
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)You know the real reason so what does it matter what bogus reason they may have?
global1
(25,249 posts)There is really no bona fide reason for not upgrading our infrastructure. It seems to me that they need to say something other than they are obstructing Obama.
It matters to know what they are saying - because I want to be knowledgeable of their position when I'm speaking to people I know that will be voting for them in November and trying to make them change their minds. Infrastructure is one of those issues that effects everyone. Like the President said - the conditions of our roads and bridges effect repubs, dems and independents alike.
This seems to me a good issue to focus on to get people to support the Dems in Nov.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)Oh, and we can't afford it. Or something.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Has to be paid for, and the only way Republicans can pay for anything nowadays is to cut social security benefits. Or the enforcement budget for the SEC. Because raising taxes, especially on their overrich pals, is off the table. And for some reason, Democrats go along with it.
tridim
(45,358 posts)They are going to get shredded with issues like this in Nov.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)Don't you think? I think the bigger question is why this isn't asked by citizens or Democratic office holders or the press.
global1
(25,249 posts)why aren't citizens, Dems or the MSM asking these questions.
The Repubs need some sort of credible response. I don't think they have one that makes any sense. They can't say Benghazi, or that they want to privatize this for their friends to cash in. Even raising taxes - IMHO - won't fly - because this is one issue that because it effects and would benefit us all - we are willing to put our tax dollars to.
We need to hold the Repubs feet to the fire on this one. I think that they would squirm if this question was repeatedly put to them.
Why don't you support infrastructure rebuilding for America?
prairierose
(2,145 posts)the country. They are there to support the agenda of their corporate overlords. The 1%, do not want to pay any taxes and nothing, like infrastructure, that allows them to be successful, is their responsibility.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)can go unnoticed. And we need to push our congressmen and senators to ask that question while they are in session.
prairierose
(2,145 posts)not very articulate and got stuck on the corporate media and did not go back to talk about how congresscritters and other public officials should be talking about this topic. When the reports come out talking about how deficient our infrastructure is...more people need to be talking about it at all levels.
rocktivity
(44,576 posts)They want to privatize or at least semi-privatize it all.
rocktivity
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Or something.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)They love wasting money.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Isn't it obvious?
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)"Its a liberal hoax like climate change. And Obama is trying to distract us from um um um?"
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)this was popular at the time of the stimulus.
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)money looking for ways to spend, spend, spend. Trust me. Save your pennies if you can and get ready for the anti-Obama-revenge economy to take off in 2017.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)The I-35 bridge in Minneapolis was built in 1961--and collapsed in 2007.
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)The fundamentals of our infrastructure is sound...rofl, sounds familiar right. Militia groups will block any road repairs bridge repairs with guns . Baggers will carry signs that say, " keep your hands off my rowdz and brigges" lol
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)but when it comes to our country's infrastructure the Rethugs have a problem with it. They are deliberately destroying the country.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)service model, the rest can go to Hell.
Also the more bridges that fall down and the more potholes one goes across the less of a positive example of government working this stuff serves.
Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)0rganism
(23,954 posts)Remember, the end goal is "profit and power".
The republican plan starts by destroying the federal government's role as a service provider, or rather the largest government at any particular level (national? federal. state? state gov't. local? municipal/county board/whatever)
When the government, whether it be county, state or federal, cannot maintain or improve the infrastructure, it fails to meet demands of some kind. This causes discontent among the public.
This in turn opens the annoyed public to the GOP's favorite form of propaganda: "the government can't meet your needs because it is too large/inefficient/bloated/union-infested/unresponsive/whatever."
Once popular agreement is established on that point, the next asserted step is, "You pay too much in taxes. You need to withhold tax revenue from the government so it can no longer try to provide the services it failed to deliver to you. Then that service can be provided by the private sector/a church/concerned volunteers/whatever instead, and they will do a much better job for less. Meanwhile you will be personally richer for not having paid as much in taxes."
At this point, if the public buys into the propaganda, they will progressively defund the government at the targeted level, making it impossible for services to be provided effectively, and reinforcing the first propaganda point. The feedback loop is complete, and revenue starvation can pretty much drive itself from there on down.
What next? What do they gain from it?
Well the first benefit is the ability to discredit the opposition: "see? big government never works!"
The next benny is more interesting. Once they take over a government that's scrambling for cash, they can contract out with their buddies in industry/religion/charity groups/whatever to do the jobs that government used to do, but obviously on a reduced scale (selectively and conditionally providing services which used to be open to all). Also, once they have their influence embedded deep in the revenue stream, they'll pump what funding remains to the parts of government where they have the most natural alliances, obviously at the expense of those to which they have little affinity -- but you didn't really need those services anyway, right?
This enables a taxpayer-funded revenue stream to targeted private entities who will, in turn, generally support republicans in their future bids for power at any level, while redirecting money to the republicans' friends and family.
global1
(25,249 posts)Why don't you support infrastructure rebuilding?
They can't say what you've suggested. They wouldn't dare tell that truth.
They have to have some answer though that they think the American People will buy. What is it?
0rganism
(23,954 posts)Question: "Why don't you support infrastructure rebuilding?"
Answer: "The government shouldn't be providing that infrastructure. The government sucks at providing most things, let's use private sector contracts instead. By the way, you should pay less taxes."
mstinamotorcity2
(1,451 posts)Any excuse will do with them. But I like what I think. they are Ridiculously Ignorant People. If not they sure use them type of folk to speak for the Party.