A conservative judiciary run amok
Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens captured our ideal when he wrote of the judge as an impartial guardian of the rule of law.
By effectively gutting the Affordable Care Act on Tuesday, two members of a three-judge panel on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals showed how far right-leaning jurists have strayed from such impartiality.
We are confronted with a conservative judiciary that will use any argument it can muster to win ideological victories that elude their side in the elected branches of our government.
Fortunately, the D.C. Circuit ruling is unlikely to stand. On the same day the D.C. panel issued its opinion, a three-judge panel from the 4th Circuit ruled unanimously the other way, upholding the law.
There is a good chance that the 11-judge D.C. Circuit will take the decision away from its panel something it is usually reluctant to do and rule as a full court to affirm the ACA as commonly understood. It is virtually certain that a majority of the courts members disagrees with the panels convoluted reading of the law and wants to avoid creating a needless conflict in jurisprudence with the 4th Circuit.
more
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ej-dionne-affordable-care-act-falls-prey-to-extreme-judicial-activism/2014/07/23/4a06dec0-129f-11e4-8936-26932bcfd6ed_story.html