National Review’s Dishonest History
John Fund thinks blacks have been fooled into supporting Democrats. Thats even more insulting than his misleading history of Jim Crow laws.
By Jamelle Bouie
Writing at National Review, conservative journalist John Fund promises to set the record straight on Jim Crow. And what does he offer? A columns worth of warmed-over partisan pablum that begins and ends with the idea that, as far as civil rights are concerned, Democrats are the real racists. Some choice passages:
Even as the nation celebrates the passage of the 50th anniversary of the Civil Rights Act, some liberals are using the occasion to bash Republicans as inheriting the legacy of Jim Crowignoring the fact that a higher percentage of Republicans in Congress voted for the Civil Rights Act than did Democrats.
[T]he political enforcement of Jim Crow was entirely in Democratic hands. The Ku Klux Klan functioned as the paramilitary wing of the Democratic party, and it was used to drive Republicans out of the South after the Civil War. Before he took up the cause of civil rights as president, Lyndon Johnson acting as Senate majority leader blocked the GOPs 1956 civil-rights bill, and gutted Eisenhowers 1957 Civil Rights Act. Democratic senators filibustered the GOPs 1960 Civil Rights Act.
First, an observation: It would be nice if Fund had reckoned with National Reviews early defense of segregation, including William F. Buckleys assertion that the cultural superiority of White over Negro is a fact that obtrudes and that National Review believes that the Souths premises are correct.
It is more important for the community, anywhere in the world, to affirm and live by civilized standards, than to bow to the demands of the numerical majority. But to borrow from Donald Rumsfeld, you engage with the pundits you have, not the ones you want.
more
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2014/07/john_fund_s_distorted_history_of_democrats_republicans_and_race_the_national.html