Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,778 posts)
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 09:33 PM Jul 2014

"House Votes To Boost Well-Off Kids, Cut Out Poor Kids"

House Votes To Boost Well-Off Kids, Cut Out Poor Kids

by Michael McAuliff at the Huffington Post

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/25/child-tax-credit_n_5620014.html?utm_hp_ref=politics

"SNIP.........................



WASHINGTON -- The House of Representatives voted Friday to change a tax credit in a way that would add $115 billion to the deficit and hurt poorer parents while aiding the well-to-do.

By a vote of 237-173, mostly along party lines, the House decided to make permanent the child tax credit and expand it to families earning up to $205,000 a year. The credit, which is worth up to $1,000 for each child in a family, would also be indexed to rise with inflation, as would the eligibility thresholds.

But the new measure fails to extend the part of the credit that was passed in 2009 to help impoverished families and that currently allows parents with annual earnings as low as $3,000 to claim some of the break. That element expires in 2017. Without it, a family would have to earn at least $15,000 to qualify for the credit.

According to an analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, that means a mom working full time at a minimum wage job would receive no help from the credit -- because she would be earning only $14,500. Indeed, that mom would lose $1,725 under the new bill, while a family of four earning $150,000 would gain $2,200, according to the center's analysis.



..........................SNIP"
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"House Votes To Boost Well-Off Kids, Cut Out Poor Kids" (Original Post) applegrove Jul 2014 OP
Anywhere it's possible to make it more difficult for the poor, Trillo Jul 2014 #1
I hate these "people" TDale313 Jul 2014 #2
The Republicans identify with corporations Jack Rabbit Jul 2014 #15
Not surprised sakabatou Jul 2014 #3
They are Assholes! sheshe2 Jul 2014 #4
What will the Senate do? The President, should it get to him? Scuba Jul 2014 #5
I don't think Harry Reid will even bring it to the floor. GoCubsGo Jul 2014 #6
Yeah, this won't become law gratuitous Jul 2014 #11
What did I tell you? When they play the game of "who needs it more," they really mean, Baitball Blogger Jul 2014 #7
GOP fuckheads TeamPooka Jul 2014 #8
Seems the GOP like the poor hungry. They think it builds character applegrove Jul 2014 #9
The bad part is rickyhall Jul 2014 #10
The really frustrating part is that it busts the budget, not that it fucks the poor jmowreader Jul 2014 #12
How do they do this in Canada? Aerows Jul 2014 #13
In Canada, the Conservative government applegrove Jul 2014 #14
The right is ever pro-suffering Aerows Jul 2014 #16

Trillo

(9,154 posts)
1. Anywhere it's possible to make it more difficult for the poor,
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 09:39 PM
Jul 2014

it is done. If the poorest can't have the credits, why should anyone have them?

TDale313

(7,820 posts)
2. I hate these "people"
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 09:41 PM
Jul 2014

They never pass up an opportunity to try and make life harder for those already struggling. Assholes.

Jack Rabbit

(45,984 posts)
15. The Republicans identify with corporations
Sun Jul 27, 2014, 12:34 AM
Jul 2014

That's why Republican congresscritters behave like artificial persons.

GoCubsGo

(32,093 posts)
6. I don't think Harry Reid will even bring it to the floor.
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 10:07 PM
Jul 2014

I strongly suspect it won't see the light of day in the Senate. Nor should it.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
11. Yeah, this won't become law
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 11:30 PM
Jul 2014

But holy smokes, are these maniacs heartless. You think any House Republicans will be asked about this vote when they break for their August recess? Fucking people over has to be exhausting, with all the recesses the House takes.

Baitball Blogger

(46,758 posts)
7. What did I tell you? When they play the game of "who needs it more," they really mean,
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 10:28 PM
Jul 2014

who has the resources to make the most of the breaks they get.

This is a source of the inequality issue.

applegrove

(118,778 posts)
9. Seems the GOP like the poor hungry. They think it builds character
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 11:13 PM
Jul 2014

or will make them study hard. Or work like dogs. All things that are good for the GOP. Because the little people were put on this earth to be good economic entities for the rich.

jmowreader

(50,562 posts)
12. The really frustrating part is that it busts the budget, not that it fucks the poor
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 11:32 PM
Jul 2014

This is our Republican Party in a nutshell:



And it pisses me off that they do this, but watch what happens when you're trying to get money for disaster relief: We need OFFSETTING SPENDING CUTS! We can add $115 billion to the deficit to pay for a tax cut for people who don't really need it and that's just dandy, but ask for $115 to buy something the country can actually use..."that's coming out of the WIC budget, you know that?"

applegrove

(118,778 posts)
14. In Canada, the Conservative government
Sun Jul 27, 2014, 12:31 AM
Jul 2014

is sending the equivalent of your IRS after charities that try to prevent poverty abroad. Apparently Oxfam Canada is only allowed to help people who are already poor, but preventing poverty programs crosses a line. There seems to be a ‘sweet spot‘ of desperation the GOP or the right wing are always trying to move non 1%ers towards.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"House Votes To Boos...