General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAn Open Letter Letter to Hollywood
I know summer blockbusters are your bread and butter, and help
pay for the artistic movies, and I do like blockbusters.
My local tv station had Back to the future on. A Movie that is 27 years old.
Minimal CGI, minimal special effects, characters that had heart and soul, that
will be remembered for for generation after generation.
So why the fuck have you spent $1.1 Billion dollars in the past five years on four movies about
fighting robots?
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)to Back To the Future a couple of months ago. I had recorded it off of HBO. My 12 yo loves it!
Dilldoe
(22 posts)Transformers :
Budget $150,000,000 (estimated)
Gross $ 709,709,780 (Worldwide) (8 November 2007)
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen:
Budget $200,000,000 (estimated)
Gross $836,303,693 (Worldwide) (15 October 2009)
Transformers: Dark of the Moon
Budget $195,000,000 (estimated)
Gross $1,123,746,996 (Worldwide) (31 December 2011)
Check out imdb.com they have even more numbers
Darth_Kitten
(14,192 posts)plus the fact that some people will watch anything, being somewhat robotic with their own choices.
dems_rightnow
(1,956 posts)Nobody is saying that the Transformer movies are some sort of classic. Just that they make huge money.
KansDem
(28,498 posts)I don't get out much. Could you please elaborate?
KansDem
(28,498 posts)I just read post no. 2...
taterguy
(29,582 posts)Your premise is fatally flawed.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Who you gonna call?
Buffy the Vampire Slayer was a big hit with them too, the movie I mean.
The old version of Clash of the Titans, they'll watch that one over and over as well, one of my granddaughters is practically obsessed over the scene with Medusa..
The Blues Brothers, they can sing every song..
YellowRubberDuckie
(19,736 posts)We had some amazing movies. Just think of the 80s movies alone. The Goonies will FOREVER be my favorite movie. You really need to introduce them to that one to if you haven't already.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)I taped it off the TV in the early 80's when she was quite young and she basically watched it until the tape wore out..
GWTW was in its first revival when I was a kid, I recall seeing at the theater..
libinnyandia
(1,374 posts)Last edited Sun Apr 8, 2012, 09:16 AM - Edit history (1)
just being a teenager.
Darth_Kitten
(14,192 posts)I was describing this anecdote about a movie and what allegedly happened behind the scenes, and she told me no director would ever have filmed that as there were no scenes like that prior to 1994.
Wha-t?????????
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)those profits from one sort of film are made to 'pay for artistic' films. They are not. They are made to make money, which they do.
The reason that technical options are used is the same reason we all use cars, although we do think hose carts are charming. Back to the Future was cutting edge tech at the time, not one new trick was left unused. That which you are calling 'minimal' was in fact a full tilt use of all the fx they had, and few they created newly for that film. So it was then exactly what the current 'summer tent pole films' are now, a huge amount of effects, explosions, action filmed to the height of the moment's potential.
Now rather than go on and on, I will say go rent Hugo, a film which is framed around the nascent art of film and the first director to see his work fall away as 'dated' due to technical progress. You will enjoy it greatly, as it speaks to much of what you are pondering here. it also looks amazing and honors the earliest film makers of all.
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)From the issue of climate change alone. Sometimes it seems pretty selfish with all the around the world sets and massive amounts of pollution created in the filming of a big budget movie. Especially when it winds up being a bad movie!
Now they can achieve the same results from a studio and a computer. Pretty slick.
Beaverhausen
(24,470 posts)wonderful, sweet, sad film. There is something for everyone out there if you look for it.
I'm also very much looking forward to the final film in Chris Nolan's Batman Trilogy.
DavidDvorkin
(19,479 posts)There's talk of a remake of Back to the Future.
brettdale
(12,382 posts)Michael Bay is not going to get his hands on it.
DavidDvorkin
(19,479 posts)because I couldn't remember what I'd read. Apparently, the subject has come up frequently, with various directors, etc., wanting to do it. The latest ones to express interest are talking about trying to do a remake at some point in the fairly far future. Michael Bay wasn't mentioned. l
I get the impression that it might not happen at all.