General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsObama Is on a Pro-Labor Roll-Just signed most important workers' rights reform of past 20 yrs
Obama Is on a Pro-Labor Roll
The president just signed the most important workers' rights reform of the past 20 years.
By Emily Bazelon
If you've been following President Obama's burst of enthusiasm for executive orders--I know it's August, but hey, you're reading this--you may have heard that he's been flexing his muscle on behalf of labor. Last month, Obama banned federal contractors from discriminating against gay workers. For that one, he won liberal kudos and conservative scolding for refusing to exempt employers that object on religious grounds. Obama got similar attention for his order in January raising the minimum wage for new federal contractors to $10.10 an hour.
So it's a little odd that the latest executive order in this bunch has gone virtually ignored (following a few dutiful daily news stories) even though it packs the biggest punch. "This is one of the most important positive steps for civil rights in the last 20 years," Paul Bland, executive director of Public Justice, a public-interest law group, says of the July 31 order. The employer-side law firm Littler Mendelson calls it "the most sweeping order to date" that the Obama administration has aimed at federal contractors. The trade group Associated Builders and Contractors is "strongly opposed" and says the order could create a federal contractor "blacklist."
What's this about? Bear with me for a minute, because there's a reason this one isn't lighting up TV screens or Twitter. It's important, but it's also kind of technical. The order, called Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces, does two things. It requires companies bidding for federal contracts worth more than $500,000 to make previous violations of labor law public, if they have any to report. That's a shaming device that the administration hopes will push companies to settle back wage claims and nudge them toward better behavior in the future.
The second part of the order is what Bland is so excited about. This provision says that companies with federal contracts worth more than $1 million can no longer force their employees out of court, and into arbitration, to settle accusations of workplace discrimination. "Here's why this is so important," Bland said when I asked him to explain. "For the last 20 years, the Supreme Court has been encouraging employers to force their workers into a system of arbitration that has been badly rigged against the workers. And so this order will result in millions of employees having their rights restored to them."
the rest:
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2014/08/obama_executive_order_on_mandatory_arbitration_huge_news_for_workers_rights.html?wpsrc=sh_all_tab_tw_top
cpamomfromtexas
(1,245 posts)That would be a boon to the airline workers who cannot strike unless allowed to. Arbitration has hidden most of the airlines dirty laundry and kept that from the public as well. Not being allowed to strike has kept wages low. Arbitrary bankruptcies of convenience like the recent one with American Airlines have decimated retirements.
riqster
(13,986 posts)Fuhgedaboutit. Baggers of all sorts will never be satisfied by anything the man does.
Not being a Bagger, I say, "Well done, Mister President!"
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,088 posts)TheMick
(23 posts)......they are executive orders, which can be undone by any succeeding president.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)don't believe in the American way only the 1%ers way so therefore Mr. President needs to go that route and hopefully there will not be a GOP in the WH for years to come and hopefully DEMS can take back the house and keep the senate. When Dems are on control everyone benefits.
stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)If a company has a judgment against it, government entities should know this, and the company should pay the judgment. Not interested in the "shame" thing.
zeemike
(18,998 posts)And a corporation has no heart...so it means nothing to them...but looks good on paper.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)After a while, esp. used in a personal context, you get results not anticipated: Dig in, double down, and deep resentment.
Human nature being what it is...resentment is the results.
Orrex
(63,215 posts)K/R!
valerief
(53,235 posts)activist thing--you know, issue their usual unfair judgments and thus set precedence?
(Pardon my ignorance on these matters.)
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)with impeachment on the table. As mentioned before, this is a pattern that the GOP party will repeatedly do whenever they are in the majority either in the house or senate and someone else is in the WH. GOP party believes that their GAWD is on their side and that a one party system is their goal pursuant to their lord. We must be saved from all the pro choice, pro marriage, pro independent thought.
valerief
(53,235 posts)PatrickforO
(14,576 posts)Putting the power of civil litigation back in the hands of people is a step that is LONG overdue.
DesertDiamond
(1,616 posts)I have been signing employment agreements for the past 20 years that include the stipulation that all disagreements must be settled by arbitration and not in court. That's not only to save attorney fees. As I found out last year via a friend whose dispute with her employer was in arbitration, this is the big secret: ARBITRATORS FAVOR THE SIDE THAT CAN GIVE THEM FUTURE BUSINESS. It is privatized "justice" which means that the arbitrator is an independent contractor who NEEDS MORE BUSINESS. It's always the employer that will give them more business. So it's always the employer who wins.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)kath
(10,565 posts)Contractors" in order to get out of paying benefits, workers comp, unemployment, and other protections?
That bullshit practice is rampant, and it really needs to stop.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)littlemissmartypants
(22,692 posts)CtDemoFarmer
(32 posts)there he wants to destroy their due process rights and create a segregated educational system with publicly funded charter schools for some and under-funded public schools for the rest. He needs to change course or Democrats will be branded as anti-public school people, and this does not even talk about the Common Core and the testing, testing, testing that goes with it.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)In fact the attacks are escalating.
I notice someone below started the "haters" rhetoric.
Telling the truth is not "hating"....that's a childish term used way too often.
This administration has teachers' unions as their targets.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)navarth
(5,927 posts)jtuck004
(15,882 posts)out of work and luck is kind of sad as well.
Still hungry kids, people who will have to live on the table scraps of Social Security, lack of investment in people - none of that is improved with this, but wealthy contractors have to figure out new ways to get around the rules. Darn the luck.
I guess, however, if your standards are low enough, this looks like daylight.
Not trying to rain on a parade, because with tens of millions facing permanent poverty if they aren't the banker friends of this administration, even this could look like good news. But the fact that someone suggests it is scraping the bottom of the barrel instead of a time to light off fireworks is likely of more concern to some than families being denied the opportunities they paid for with their blood and labor.
If it is, you are in luck, because I think your opinions are none of my business, and I will work to keep it that way.
Cha
(297,298 posts)mahalo kpete.. really nice to see this for our Workers!
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)It didn't work for my friends when their jobs were sent to Singapore 11 years ago!!!
Yet, arbitration was where the judge sent them to hammer out their differences when the company made their huge anti-American move and some of the workers started a suit to keep their jobs!!!
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Hekate
(90,714 posts)mdbl
(4,973 posts)Does anyone know of an arbiter who has ever ruled on the side of labor? I don't. Everything I've seen is always pro-business, and usually the ruling promotes punitive actions that make it look like the 1920's.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid