'Family Values' Means Very Different Things for Men and Women in the Christian Right Hierarchy
http://www.alternet.org/gender/family-values-means-very-different-things-men-and-women-christian-right-hierarchy
One of the great self-justifying myths of the conservatives is that their support for traditional gender roles is not rooted in misogyny, but in family values. They dont hate women and want to keep them down, the argument goes, so much as they believe everyone--including women--benefits if women are relegated to a submissive role in marriage and prevented from exercising reproductive rights. Theyre not trying to oppress women for the benefit of men, they argue. Theyre trying to protect them.
Its easy to uphold those family values when only women have to pay the price for them. But the real test is when the purported beliefs of the religious right conflict with what men want. Women are asked to sacrifice a lot in the name of family values, such as the right to leave unhappy marriages or the right to abort unwanted pregnancies. But are conservatives willing to ask the same of men? Two recent examples demonstrate that when family values conflict with a mans interests, suddenly family values arent as important as the right generally says they are.
The case of former Virginia governor Bob McDonnell is a particularly stomach-churning example. Along with Rick Santorum and Mike Huckabee, Bob McDonnell was supposed to be one of the great Christian right politicians whose commitment to a fundamentalist view of family life would set an example for the rest of America. The Christian right argument regarding marriage, which Bob McDonnell laid out in his 1989 masters thesis at the conservative Christian Regent University, is purportedly one of exchange: Women submit to their husbands, staying home to serve their husbands and raise children; and in exchange, men offer protection and cherish women to the point of coddling.
As Dahlia Lithwick explained on Slate, The thesis was an argument for infusing Christian Republican values into government policy, on the grounds that traditional marriage is the best safeguard against immorality and selfishness. In order to preserve this traditional definition of marriage, McDonnell expected women to sacrifice reproductive rights, independent thinking and employment outside of the home. McDonnell claimed his views had softened since then, but as Lithwick notes, his actual policy positions as a politician suggested otherwise. Not only did McDonnell fight against abortion rights, he also pushed to make divorce much harder to get in the state of Virginia. Even though stricter divorce laws usually serve to make it harder for women to escape abusive relationships, asking women to give up personal safety in the name of family values was clearly not too great a sacrifice for McDonnell.