There’s Another Mammoth Global Trade Agreement You’ve Never Heard Of

[Scuba]

http://billmoyers.com/2014/08/12/theres-another-mammoth-global-trade-agreement-you%E2%80%99ve-never-heard-of/

Most progressives are, by now, familiar with the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), the proposed trade deal that would link the United States with Pacific Rim powerhouses like Australia and Japan. Wonkier corners of the left are equally conversant in the intrigue of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), a pact that would couple the United States and the European Union. Like-minded critics would do well by memorizing yet another trade acronym: TISA, or the Trade in Services Agreement. Judging by the stakes and the ultra-secrecy of the negotiations, it could easily be the worst of the bunch.

Here’s what we know: Fifty countries, including the United States, the EU nations, Australia, Canada, Hong Kong, Japan, Switzerland, Taiwan and Turkey, have been in TISA talks since 2012. The resulting agreement will set the terms for almost 70 percent of global trade in “services”: everything from banking and construction to telecom and tourism.

The public got its first glimpse of the treaty on June 19, when WikiLeaks published a draft of the agreement’s chapter on financial services. It wasn’t pretty. The text included proposals to extend new “market access” guarantees to all participating states and fresh limits on the ability of nations to “discriminate” against foreign financial firms. The section hasn’t been finalized, but the leak confirmed what TISA skeptics feared: The United States and EU are leading the charge to block countries from imposing domestic regulations on the multi-trillion-dollar services industries.

...

In the United States, TISA’s biggest cheerleader is the Coalition of Service Industries (CSI), a lobbying titan that includes the likes of AT&T, Citigroup, Deloitte, Ebay, Google, Microsoft and Walt Disney. CSI, in turn, has helped prop up “Team TISA,” a broader business alliance whose 6 co-chairs represent a comically nefarious cross-section of corporate America: Citigroup, IBM, Liberty Mutual, MetLife, UPS and Walmart.

[RKP5637]

1. And many often mock others when suggesting we seem to be moving toward 'one world government!' This

post bears repeating IMO ... Is there ever a national discussion and buy in by 'we the people' about anything anymore? Most citizens have little say about most things IMO ...

""Who rules America?" By Allan J. Lichtman, contributor at the Hill"

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025376768

[Enthusiast]

2. They hate us for our freedom. K&R!

[pampango]

3. The far right is all over these "One World Government" international agreements.

Do you believe that a secretive power elite with a globalist agenda is conspiring to eventually rule the world through an authoritarian world government, or New World Order, or not?

'Very Liberal' : Yes - 12%, No - 69%;
'Somewhat Liberal' : Yes - 20%, No - 51%;
'Moderate': Yes - 23%, No - 56%;
'Somewhat Conservative' : Yes - 33%, No - 38%;
'Very Conservative' : Yes - 45%, No - 26%.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_National_ConspiracyTheories_040213.pdf

From the poll, it appears that the more conservative one is, the more likely one is to believe in the "One World Government" CT. Of course, the "very conservative" view a OWG as a liberal, socialist conspiracy which is why tea party meetings are filled with speakers on Agenda 21, the UN Disabilities Treaty, etc.

[Romulox]

4. I'm not sure that the Party of NAFTA and MFN China even has the vocabulary to address this.

How do you tell someone metro-Detroit that "free trade" is ok for what they do for a living, but not for what you do for a living? How do you frame the discussion? Fairness? Efficiency? Both of those suggest a consistency between how we compel workers to "compete!" with global labor--regardless if those workers' collars are blue or white. Instead, we find that everything is different this time, and that, somehow, White Collar jobs are worth protecting in a way that working people's jobs were not, and are not.

I don't even know how Democrats bring up this subject.

[GeorgeGist]

5. The cheapest way to achieve One World Government ...

is for corporations to buy it.