Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThere's crazy, and there's Teabagger crazy ........
(Salon) Defeated Mississippi Senate candidate Chris McDaniel, aka Americas No. 1 source of lingering political entertainment, has submitted his challenge of the June 24 GOP runoff results to the courts. This was his only remaining option, as the Mississippi GOP took one quick look at his complaint and said, uhh, not our problem, and scrammed.
The complaint filed yesterday requests an immediate injunction of Sen. Thad Cochrans certification as the Republican Party Senate nominee and ballot placement until such time as this Complaint can be heard and the relief requested herein granted and accomplished.
And the relief requested herein, just as it was in the original complaint filed to the state party earlier this month, is totally hilarious and probably not likely to sway a judge. McDaniels team once again is requesting that some counties where McDaniel did badly be voided and McDaniel named the nominee.
McDaniel is probably (hopefully?) aware that this legal challenge is ridiculously weak, and so hes using it as an opportunity to harden his following for a lucrative tour on the wingnut welfare circuit. And so he invokes the Constitution as grounds for why he actually, uh, won the Republican primary, even though he lost it, having secured fewer votes than his opponent. He essentially argues that open primaries in Mississippis case, theres no party registration so anyone can vote in any partys primary are unconstitutional. Therefore Thad Cochrans strategy of reaching out to Democratic and African-American voters was a violation of Mississippi Republicans constitutional rights. Hoo boy:
The First Amendment protects the freedom to join together in furtherance of common political beliefs, which necessarily presupposes the freedom to identify the people who constitution the association, and to limit the association to those people. The right to association includes the right not to associate. In no area is the political associations First Amendment right to not associate more important than in the process of selecting its nominee......................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.salon.com/2014/08/15/mississippi_tea_party_nuts_last_hurrah_make_me_the_nominee_because_of_the_consitution/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1204 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
There's crazy, and there's Teabagger crazy ........ (Original Post)
marmar
Aug 2014
OP
Turbineguy
(37,372 posts)1. He obviously wants a promotion from
teabagger crazy to dangerous idiot.
Hugin
(33,207 posts)2. "... wingnut welfare circuit... "
Now, there's a quote I can use... Repeatedly.
Wounded Bear
(58,721 posts)3. I actually don't like "open" primary elections...
I think of them as strategies by losers who don't have the demographics to actually win a traditional one, but want to force everyone else to recognize them.
But when they sneak up and stab a Repub in the back, I can appreciate them.
Monk06
(7,675 posts)4. So freedom of association implies the right to deny others the right to freedom of association.
Yeah that'll work. A little grammar would help too.
sakabatou
(42,176 posts)5. He has a giant case of sore loser.