General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFerguson: With So Many Guns in America, Police Are Trained to Live in Fear
The problems of racial harassment and police militarization are exacerbated by the fact that America has a heavily-armed civilian population. While there are no official totals, there are an estimated 320 million guns in the United States, approximately one per person. It is often said that America has a gun culture, one that some celebrate and others bemoan. Whatever one's personal views about guns, there is no denying their presence in every American city, from Philadelphia to Ferguson. Nor should we fail to recognize the profound impact this has on law enforcement.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/adam-winkler/ferguson-guns-america-police-fear_b_5688750.html
It's been pointed out in other threads that police shootings are very rare in other countries with sensible gun laws. They also have very few George Zimmerman type incidents, and also much lower rates of homicide and gun violence. Obviously, gun control is not the only issue here -- race has a lot to do with it. But the fact that many people are walking around with guns makes everyone more afraid, and makes shootings by both police and by civilians much more likely.
Response to DanTex (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
DanTex
(20,709 posts)MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Response to MineralMan (Reply #5)
Name removed Message auto-removed
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Seeya!
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)Orrex
(63,213 posts)Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)A little wrinkle in the argument there.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)But there's no denying that a heavily armed population causes both civilians and police to fear that the other guy might have a gun, and be quicker to resort to lethal force.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)gun laws we have now. That is not to deny that some black people have guns but they are not out there marching with them that I can see.
hack89
(39,171 posts)judging from the incredible amounts of gun violence their communities endure on a daily basis.
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)and usually out of sight.
Marr
(20,317 posts)I've heard them justify a hell of a lot on the statement that they "felt threatened". If you scare that easily, maybe you should just fix copy machines or something.
KeepItReal
(7,769 posts)That's 0.2%
Not buying that everyone has a weapon mess.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)There's also no denying that lots of people walking around with guns cause both police and other civilians to be more afraid that the other guy might be armed.
KeepItReal
(7,769 posts)Than my unarmed, Black, male, self.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)But I also thing that some police officers probably fear that black males like yourself might be carrying a gun, much more so than they would in say, England, where basically nobody has a gun.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)What I see is racism, pure and simple. Just go see how hard it is to find a black-owned gun shop. The RKBA folks like their guns, but pretty much only in white hands.
Consider the Bundy incident. Now, there were some people with guns. They stood down law enforcement. I don't think gun ownership has anything to do with Ferguson.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)The think about gun proliferation is that, contrary to the NRA talking point, the guns don't just stay in the hands of "good guys". The ease with which anyone can get a gun in this country means that a lot of criminals of any race are armed, much more so than in other countries.
In England, for example, most police don't even carry guns because they don't need them. In Germany, police shot something like 90 bullets during an entire year. I agree that guns did not play a direct role in this incident, but in the overall situation of police shootings, I think it is a big factor.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)carrying firearms, especially in the southern states. Not tolerated by police. The Ferguson cops weren't worried about that.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)The police sees a young black male, racially profiles him, assumes he is some kind of criminal or gang member. In the US, that frequently means armed with a gun. In other countries, that would generally mean armed with a knife. Big difference.
Like I said, I agree about Ferguson.
stone space
(6,498 posts)...a phenomena restricted solely to Fergusen.
There has been an militarization of both the public and the police.
The citizens of Fergusen would have to deal with that fact even if there were zero guns in Fergusen.
Most of your considerations are assuming that the militarization of the police in Fergusen is a purely local matter. It is not.
We need to face up to the fact that the militarization of the police is intimately tied to the militarization of the public. (And the police are going to win that arms race, except in very rare isolated instances where their being outgunned only serves to point out the "need" for further militarization of the police.)
It wouldn't surprise me one bit if the flooding of this country with weapons is consciously and intentionally done in order to help enable the militarization of the police.
Racism will be a major factor regardless, but how that racism is expressed will depend on how much military hardware is available.
dilby
(2,273 posts)I think it's their fear of guns that keep them from shooting.
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)And we all pay the price so "some" can save the world with their gun.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)to fear the public; way before the gun collecting frenzy we've been in since 2001.
pintobean
(18,101 posts)Nothing I've seen anyway. Everyone wants to try to tie their pet issue to this shooting and its aftermath.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)But in the larger scheme of police violence, guns are absolutely part of the story. In countries with sensible gun laws, you don't get nearly as many police shootings.
951-Riverside
(7,234 posts)Most of the people these police thugs gun down arent armed with firearms and when they are armed like at Bundy ranch these police thugs tuck tail and RUN.
You can't blame people for being freaked out when they see cops killing handcuffed people like Oscar Grant in Oakland, Beating and strangling Kelly Thomas to death in Fullerton, Beating the shit out of an old man Jay Walking in NYC, Strangling that poor man in NYC to death and Pointing guns at Media in Furguson.
By the way, I don't own guns, I don't like guns, I don't like being around them and I've never held one.
NONE OF THESE PEOPLE POSED ANY THREAT TO POLICE!
GUN CONTROL AND POLICE ABUSE ARE TWO VASTLY DIFFERENT ISSUES!
THERE IS NO GOD DAMN EXCUSE FOR HOW THE POLICE HAVE BEEN BEHAVING OVER THE PAST DECADE.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)But gun control and police shootings are related. In the UK most cops don't carry guns. A recent OP pointed out the Belgium just had their first lethal police shooting in their entire history. In Germany, the police fired a total of about 90 shots in an entire year. Stuff like this is much more rare in countries with sensible gun laws. This isn't an excuse, but there is a connection.
Matrosov
(1,098 posts)..our civilians are also militarized. There are few things to which law enforcement has access that civilians cannot own as well.
Helmets and body armor? Legal for civilian ownership and use.
Semi-automatic assault rifles? Legal for civilian ownership and use.
Semi-automatic sniper rifles? Legal for civilian ownership and use.
Anti-material sniper rifles? Legal for civilian ownership and use.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Must have been a good one.
Taitertots
(7,745 posts)It is just a quaint excuse for systemic human rights abuses.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Add Kaz Powell to the mountain of truth.
Very kicked.