Rioting Mainly for Fun and Profit: The Neoconservative Origins of Our Police Problem
Rioting Mainly for Fun and Profit: The Neoconservative Origins of Our Police Problem
by Mike Konczal at Next New Deal
http://www.nextnewdeal.net/rortybomb/rioting-mainly-fun-and-profit-neoconservative-origins-our-police-problem
"SNIP..........................
Before the modern liberal state of accountability and due process, the police force wasn't judged by its compliance with appropriate procedures but instead by its success in maintaining order. Since the 1960s, the shift of police from order maintenance to law enforcement has brought them increasingly under the influence of legal restrictions
The order maintenance functions of the police are now governed by rules developed to control police relations with suspected criminals, writes Wilson. According to this theory, order is preserved by the police out there, acting in the moment against minor infractions with a strong display of force, not by liberal notions of accountability and fairness.
This neoconservative vision that started in the 1960s and continues into today doesnt just inform local arguments about policing, but rather the entire policy debate. So much of the debate over the (neo)conservative movement emphasizes suburban warriors, or evangelicals, or the Sun Belt, or the South. But as Alice OConnor demonstrates in her paper "The Privatized City: The Manhattan Institute, the Urban Crisis, and the Conservative Counterrevolution in New York," there was a distinct urban character to this thinking as well.
Rather than a crisis of race relations, police violence, poverty, or anything else, rioting and the broader urban crisis were framed by the neoconservative movement as a crisis of values and culture precipitated by liberalism.
The broader urban crisis, in this story, hinges not on structural issues but on personal morality and behavior that can be restored by the extension of the market. Crime and urban disorder fit right next to social engineering and failing state institutions as a corrupt legacy of the liberal project and its bureaucratic, administrative governing state. Only the conservative agenda, as O'Connor puts it, of zero-tolerance law enforcement, school choice, hard-nosed implementation of welfare reform, and the large-scale privatization of municipal and social services is capable of dismantling it. Only through the market, individual responsibility, and freedom from government interference can order result from the restoration of political and cultural authority to a resolutely anti-liberal elite. This legacy harnesses police excess to the triumph of the market. And as we see, it will be hard to dislodge one while the other reigns supreme.
.............................SNIP"