Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe 6 Strangest Libertarian Ideas
http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/6-strangest-libertarian-ideas***SNIP
1. Parents should be allowed to let their children starve to death. Were not making this up. From progressive writer Matt Bruenig (via Sean McElwee at Salon) comes this excerpt from libertarian economist Murray Rothbard:
a parent does not have the right to aggress against his children, but also should not have a legal obligation to feed, clothe, or educate his children, since such obligations would entail positive acts coerced upon the parent and depriving the parent of his rights. The parent therefore may not murder or mutilate his child, and the law properly outlaws a parent from doing so. But the parent should have the legal right not to feed the child, i.e., to allow it to die.
***SNIP
2. We must deregulate companies like Uber, even when they cheat. So-called ridesharing services like Lyft and Uber are actually taxi services using unlicensed contractors. Theyre heavily promoted by libertarians who tout them as ideal examples of the free market as a counter to bureaucratized, more traditional taxicab services.
***SNIP
3. We should eliminate Social Security and Medicare. Libertarian/Republican icon Rand Paul holds with the libertarian faith in his steadfast opposition to both Medicare and Social Security. The fundamental reason why Medicare is failing is why the Soviet Union failed, says Paul. Socialism doesnt work.
***SNIP
4. Society doesnt have the right to enforce basic justice in public places of business. From Rep. Ron Paul, Sen. Pauls father:
the Civil Rights Act of 1964 did not improve race relations or enhance freedom. Instead, the forced integration dictated by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 increased racial tensions while diminishing individual liberty.
This was Rep. Pauls reasoning in voting against a resolution which praised the Civil Rights Act. The libertarian position, as articulated by the Paul family, appears to be this: a business owners rights, even in a public place of business, extend to the ability to discriminate solely on the basis of skin color.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 812 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The 6 Strangest Libertarian Ideas (Original Post)
xchrom
Aug 2014
OP
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)1. Mama mia!
Do they actually believe this crap?
xchrom
(108,903 posts)2. what can i tell you? they're weird. nt
MisterP
(23,730 posts)3. Rothbard also says it's more moral to let a retarded child starve to death than to tax anyone
for their upkeep (but unlike other festering amoral quasi-eugenicists Rothbard never bragged about not reading the books he attacked)