General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBurgers and Bullets shutters Four days after a 9 year old girl accidentally killed an instructor
Burgers and Bullets shuttersFour days after a 9 year old girl accidentally killed an instructor on the Burgers and Bullets range with a fully automatic Uzi sub machine gun, and one day after the range operator told Chris Hayes that his business would stay open, it closes indefinitely.
VIDEO & MORE:
http://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/burgers-and-bullets-shutters-323020355921
handmade34
(22,756 posts)people would stop saying the "girl killed an instructor" ... THE GUN killed the instructor
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)she didn't intend to kill the instructor, but she was wielding the gun, and it was her finger that initiated the firing of the gun that she was unable to control.
She may not be legally responsible for the killing of the instructor, because she's not old enough to take ownership of her actions, and she was acting under the direction of an adult. But there's no doubt that her actions resulted in the death of the instructor.
I feel bad for this 9 year-old girl. She'll have to live with the knowledge of what she did for the rest of her life. A sane society that isn't obsessed with gun culture would never have afforded her the opportunity to be involved in this tragedy.
Sid
handmade34
(22,756 posts)on the verbiage
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
rock
(13,218 posts)1. The girl killed an instructor;
2. The gun killed the instructor;
3. The bullet killed the instructor;
4. The culture of gun fetishism killed the instructor.
FarPoint
(12,409 posts)rock
(13,218 posts)#5 Second Amendment Rights killed the instructor.
RobinA
(9,893 posts)on the part of the instructor killed the instructor.
I like your take!
TheBlackAdder
(28,209 posts)Saying that the girl killed the instructor is akin to saying that a student driver or student pilot was at fault for an accident when they were under the direct tutelage of an instructor--someone directing and controlling the student's actions and that of the equipment.
Though it was the girl's finder on the trigger, though the girl appeared to lose her left hand grip on the weapon...
It was the instructor's job to assess the student and determine if she was capable to fire the weapon.
===
While the parent's exercised poor judgment, it was up to the business and instructor to determine whether the girl was capable to handle the equipment--and if not, they should have denied her request or given her another weapon to use. They used the lame, it was on her bucket list' as an excuse to say that a 9yo was old enough to make this choice.
The instructor might have been under pressure to let her fire the weapon, for the sake of the sale, but it was not the girl's fault in any way. The girl did not know what to expect, the site offered NO protections to anyone nearby, in the event something went wrong. The weapon could have easily spun and killed the girl or others.
jmowreader
(50,560 posts)Uzis have a "vertical recoil" - aka "muzzle climb" - that goes up and to the left at pretty close to a 45-degree angle. Watch this video, and pay particular attention to the gun's muzzle:
These are gun pros, almost all with Uzi experience, and their gun has the special Israeli Army anti-climb handgrip. All of them are experiencing muzzle climb in the "auto" setting.
Here's the question: This man had to have known what Uzis do when you set them to auto and pull the trigger sharply to the rear. Why was he standing in the path of the muzzle?
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)first the Uzi should have had only a few rounds in it
Second he should have been on the right
Stupid in all respects. That Uzi should never have been fired by a child.
ksoze
(2,068 posts)Clearly better than getting hit with a bullet, but also good way to get hit with ejected shells. I"m not sure where I would stand with a 9 year old with an Uzi in AUTO mode, but I'm gonna guess far away.
jmowreader
(50,560 posts)The M16A1 had a big problem for left-handed shooters - it ejected the empties to the rear, so anyone firing it left-handed had to attach a deflector to keep the brass from hitting them in the face. It was fixed in the A2.
Where would I have stood with a 9-year-old and an Uzi? On my own two feet and told her air-headed parents, "she can fire an M-249 or an M-60, either of which is more fun than the Uzi, but nothing smaller."
TheBlackAdder
(28,209 posts)Crunchy Frog
(26,587 posts)I hope the girl can get a good therapist who will help her understand that she bears no responsibility for this at all.
MH1
(17,600 posts)It may have been an "accident" but he killed himself as surely as if he had been doing something as irresponsible as playing with the loaded Uzi while he was also heavily loaded. (drunk that is.)
He didn't handle the situation remotely properly, if there ever is a proper way to train a NINE YEAR OLD to handle an Uzi loaded with 32 rounds. A guest on one of the talk shows, who is supposedly also a gun instructor, pointed out that where he had his hand wasn't even correct for showing someone how to shoot, and was of no use if the shooter lost control, as she did. As an instructor, Vacca should have known this.
RiffRandell
(5,909 posts)people, people kill people". Bullshit, and this proves it.
still_one
(92,219 posts)with providing the UZI.
If a person is driving a car and kills someone, it is not the car that caused the death, but the operator, whether intentional or not. That is the reality of the situation
tblue
(16,350 posts)makes it crystal clear. That poor girl, and her stupid parents. They share a huge part of the blame even if they were nowhere nearby.
still_one
(92,219 posts)Crunchy Frog
(26,587 posts)By putting an Uzi in the hands of a 9 year old, he bears full responsibility for the consequences.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)a place they would choose as a family destination have serious problems. I want nothing to do with the culture that identifies with this sort of depravity.
hlthe2b
(102,292 posts)Honestly such obsession over guns is beyond the pale.
Initech
(100,081 posts)All I could think when I saw that was that if you own enough guns and ammunition that you need a $1500 safe to secure it all, you've got a problem.
ManiacJoe
(10,136 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)I get it that gun nuts don't understand that a large segment of the American population thinks they are seriously deranged, but we do. We hate gun culture, everything about it, top to bottom. We think taking your kid to "burgers and bullets" is sick, depraved, criminally irresponsible. We think owning a freaking arsenal is bizarre.
ManiacJoe
(10,136 posts)The price is based on the strength and fire-proofing of the box.
If all you want to do is keep your 3-year-old out of the gun box, then you need not spend more than a few hundred dollars. Keeping out the burglars requires something more substantial and more pricy.
Jim Beard
(2,535 posts)They always have three on display and they said they sold quit a few of them.
underpants
(182,829 posts)Also the amount if liability insurance probably just , excuse me, shot through the roof.
He's probably also been hiding his money...
FarPoint
(12,409 posts)Death claim....? If I understand the concept of workers compensation, you can't file a lawsuit with the employer...safety violation penalties can be applicable...
underpants
(182,829 posts)Workers comp only pays $xxx while a lawsuit could be more.
FarPoint
(12,409 posts)The concept of workers compensation was established due to employer lawsuits from injuries occurring in the course of employment. That said, this situation appears to fall into this category... I understand each state may vary. It will be interesting to see if a new company emerges to replace this one...
Cha
(297,323 posts)stupidity existed.
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)They claim they will have a system that keeps you from shooting once you have started drinking but I am sure that will work as well as putting an Uzi in a nine year old's hand did.
Since this idea sounds totally insane here is an article that proves it is true. Insane but true.
http://money.cnn.com/2014/06/09/smallbusiness/gun-range-alcohol/
Bluzmann57
(12,336 posts)Yeah that'll work real well. Nobody gets into fights at a bar.
Whiskeytide
(4,461 posts)Cha
(297,323 posts)separating the guns from the alcohol.. "Guns being the new Golf" and all.
Takket
(21,577 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)As if anything good could possibly come of that brain fart.
Thirty-five years ago Devo said the human race was devolving. Time has only proven them spectacularly correct.
dickthegrouch
(3,175 posts)ATF will have jurisdiction over all of it
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)TV was black and white and the cops were getting kittens out of trees and Mom was in the kitchen baking apple pie while Dad went to work. Kind of Ozzie and Harriet/Dick Van Dyke days.
Paladin
(28,264 posts)Today's out-of-control gun culture is to blame. Firearms used to be regarded as serious objects; not anymore. Guns with pink hardware. Guns openly carried into burger joints and shopping malls. Guns styled like military armaments, so middle-aged individuals can continue playing soldier games. And, God help us, shooting ranges where fully-automatic guns are available to 9 year-olds. All of these unfortunate trends are relatively recent, they are the creation of a militant, almost wholly right-wing gun culture, and innocent lives are the price being paid, on a daily basis.
Cha
(297,323 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)"It's not Disneyland".
greatlaurel
(2,004 posts)The marketing of guns and gun related merchandise is a very well researched marketing campaign to separate people from their money disguised as the Second Amendment. It is clever, but like most ideas created by corporations the consequences have been and will continue to be horrendous. The percentage of people who fall for this marketing strategy goes down every year, so the same people have to be convinced to buy more guns and ammo to keep the corporate profits increasing.
Most of these folks who fall for this type of marketing probably cannot understand how ridiculously easy their are being manipulated for corporate profit.
The marketing of guns as toys and entertainment is obscene.
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)ditto
"the marketing of guns as toys and entertainment is obscene."
That's the right word for it.
Trajan
(19,089 posts)Esteemed veteran of the Gungeon Wars ...
Tip of the hat to ya, Budlet ...
Paladin
(28,264 posts)malaise
(269,054 posts)until TheCowsCameHome posted the link.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025447498#post17
FarPoint
(12,409 posts)Tragic lesson....
What an absolute cretin was the owner who went on tv to deny there was anything wrong or worrisome about letting a child handle a fully automatic gun like that.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)"I'm more intelligent than you" gunner style that gets under my skin. Just the facts mam just the facts all point to guns are good more guns are better.
3catwoman3
(24,007 posts)...of ANY kind is on a nine year old's "bucket list" is ridiculous. A bucket list for someone that age should be sleep away camp, or making the travel soccer team, or winning the 4th grade spelling bee. I was totally disgusted when he said that.
The very name of the place betrays a much too casual attitude toward guns. Burgers are a casual food, easy to prepare, and not requiring much effort to plan. Handling firearms would seem to have nothing in common with casual, easy and not much effort required.
Iggo
(47,558 posts)Who are these fucking idiots?
ksoze
(2,068 posts)The fascination with machine guns and large weapons is more wide spread than you may think - it's not backwoods hicks. The media, games and the gun culture have created an excitement about blasting away with an automatic weapon. That desire is in many young people who would and do pay to shoot a machine gun. How a 9 year old can be allowed by both the parents and gun range is perplexing and a result like this cannot be unexpected.
brush
(53,789 posts)on the use of automatic weapons in the shooting range part of this business just as there is an age restriction on the alcohol intake side of Burgers and Bullets.
But that would make too much sense.
enough
(13,259 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)...taking their children there.
Sadly, it's probably because they're worried about their own lives.
(Not going to watch the video at work so someone feel free to set me right if I have it wrong.)
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,182 posts)I had no idea the place was called "Bullets and Burgers".
Curious, I googled it. There's another one in Las Vegas, and its Trip Advisor rankings listed it as the highest ranked attraction in Las Vegas. Out of 575 attractions.
Now, I'm not someone who finds Las Vegas to be the center of high culture, but certainly there are more worthwhile places in the city to visit than a combination restaurant/gun range.
I don't get some people. I really don't.
ksoze
(2,068 posts)Those TA reviews are an small example of what the media and gaming focus on these guns has created - read them. These people are not just crazed backwoods people - the curiosity and desire to blast away at something has been sensitized in our culture.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,182 posts)And what it is, is that they pick you up in a Humvee and take you out to a range where you shoot off all sorts of military grade weaponry so they get a chance to shoot all the things that our troops shoot.
Yes. They've actually done it. They made a tourist attraction out of war, and apparently people looooove it.
I find this so incredibly insulting to veterans of actual wars as well as anyone who's ever been affected by an actual war. War is truly hell. it scars people emotionally, deeply. Why would anyone in their right mind want to make it a tourist attraction?
ksoze
(2,068 posts)you played war with toy guns and so did I. Our kids played it with video games and now it is played with real hardware. The military uses the hardware to recruit soldiers and there is no shortage of people who will pay to relive their boyhood games with real guns and tanks. I would guess the military is not insulted by these attractions at all.
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)I would happily K&R it.
logosoco
(3,208 posts)What has this country come to?
The cheapest package was $99. There was one seemed to be aimed at kids for $109. They even had "cutesy" names. Who has that kind of money to spend on something that is ... what? I don't get it?
I hope this is not going to get any bigger of a thing.
underpants
(182,829 posts)See my post #36 below. People travel from around the world and within the US to states that allow ranges to have these weapons. Lots of recent articles on it.
logosoco
(3,208 posts)We went on a family road trip this summer, following roughly the old Route 66. I was tickled to see things like a giant rocking chair and a whale and the Cadillac ranch. I don't know what I would have thought if we had come across one of these places.
underpants
(182,829 posts)You can google it - several recent articles as you can imagine.
The use of fully automatic weapons is still quite restricted. The cost of such a weapon could be $1-2k if you are allowed to own one. Ranges, with their *ahem* safety procedures and qualified instructors, are allowed in some states to have different weapons. I heard an indoor gun range here in Richmond advertising on RW radio a 4th if July blast-a-thon or something like that. Nevada is another. Going to Vegas? Why not go pay $200 or so, instead if buying one - if you can, and blast away. Apparently Hawaiian gun ranges of this kind are very popular with Asian tourists.
Just letting you know.
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)No civilian can buy a fully automatic weapon if it was manufactured after 1986. It has to have been made before 1986 for it to be transferable, which requires a $200 Federal tax stamp, a background check by the ATF and for an UZI about $12,000 dollars.
The really low end ones, the MAC-10's and WWII Sten guns run about $4500
underpants
(182,829 posts)I knew it was a prohibitive cost. Thanks for the detail.
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)the bigger belt fed machine guns will run $40,000 and up depending on what kind it is and how much historical significance it has.
Generally requires someone with deep pockets
jmowreader
(50,560 posts)The Arizona Last Stop truck stop, which is 60 miles from Vegas (and which has the apparently-very-good burgers), has a machine gun range. Bullets and Burgers is in Vegas; they take people from Sin City to Arizona to shoot. Whether the two businesses belong to the same people, or someone in Vegas realized he could make lots of money by taking people out there, I don't know.
Egnever
(21,506 posts)There are several here just off the strip.
jmowreader
(50,560 posts)I can kinda see why you'd choose this one - included in the price of your range day is a visit to the Hoover Dam.
malthaussen
(17,204 posts)I keep coming back to a line in Pournelle and Niven's Oath of Fealty. "Think of it as evolution in action."
-- Mal
Egnever
(21,506 posts)Gun ranges have been popping up here like 7-11's I can think of five of these places just off the top of my head all offering the same shoot the biggest gun we can find BS.
It has been puzzling me for a couple of years now how these places stay open but they keep opening new ones so it must be doing well.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)"MAAAAAHHHHH RIIIOOOTS ARE BEING INFRINGED!!!!!"
I hope Sister Sarah addresses this travesty.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Buns_of_Fire
(17,183 posts)Beaverhausen
(24,470 posts)corkhead
(6,119 posts)smokey nj
(43,853 posts)that's to die for.
Phentex
(16,334 posts)greatlaurel
(2,004 posts)What a nasty person to create such a vile idea. He will surely pop up again with a equally foul marketing idea.
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)into a shell outfit with a figure head. It probably will reopen as a "different" company.
ksoze
(2,068 posts)These type of attractions are prevalent and as many here now learn, popular with the masses. The fact that minors are allowed to handle these military grade weapons is hard to believe when one views the video and sees how dangerous it is. I am not sure of the state or federal reporting requirements, but I am willing to bet that there have been more close calls. You could not pay me enough to stand near a minor holding an automatic weapon and I am curious as to what was behind her - we know her mom filming the incident and appears that she could just as easily been killed or injured as would anyone near her.
librechik
(30,674 posts)lunasun
(21,646 posts)At one store which never had it before, there was an entire kiosk set up with about ten different gun fan magazines. Everywhere I go now I see an increase in this similar to how there are so many more fitness magazines than there were say 20 years ago
OK this a free country and you can read what you want , I am just commenting on the increase and how popular this is now with Joe and Jane Q Public.
This seems to be a new popular pastime
Read the mag see suggestions and ads for gun vacations I guess.
Sienna86
(2,149 posts)Who would insure such a place that allows 9 year olds to fire an Uzi? No one.
ecstatic
(32,712 posts)Blue Owl
(50,427 posts)Last edited Sat Aug 30, 2014, 12:30 AM - Edit history (1)
steve2470
(37,457 posts)moondust
(19,993 posts)jmowreader
(50,560 posts)A howitzer can't rear up and shoot someone standing behind the gunner.
gldstwmn
(4,575 posts)steve2470
(37,457 posts)thelordofhell
(4,569 posts)liberal N proud
(60,336 posts)In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)aikoaiko
(34,172 posts)The UZI accident in Massachusetts should have been the wake up call to gun ranges.