Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,994 posts)
Tue Sep 2, 2014, 08:13 PM Sep 2014

2 Former Senators/Whores For $$$ ---Hired By Russia To Lobby AGAINST US Sanctions Against Russia

And the latest example of American patriotism

Gazprombank GPB (OJSC), a Russian bank targeted with sanctions by President Obama over the Ukraine crisis, has hired two former U.S. senators to lobby against those sanctions, according to a new disclosure filed with the Senate.

Gazprombank is controlled by Russia’s state-owned energy company Gazprom, the country’s largest gas producer; it supplies about a third of Europe’s natural gas.

In a filing submitted Friday and effective that day, former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott, R-Miss., and former Senator John Breaux, D-La., are listed as the main lobbyists under the Gazprombank account for the firm Squire Patton Boggs, lobbying on “banking laws and regulations including applicable sanctions.”

Lotts name is especially outrageous given the number of times the GOP has accused Obama of being a traitor.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/02/russian-bank-trent-lott_n_5754098.html

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
2 Former Senators/Whores For $$$ ---Hired By Russia To Lobby AGAINST US Sanctions Against Russia (Original Post) kpete Sep 2014 OP
Lott is such a hypocrite and ass. nt Ilsa Sep 2014 #1
You mad, breaux? Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2014 #9
DUzy! riqster Sep 2014 #14
Oh Yeah!! LOL. nt Ilsa Sep 2014 #18
their loyalty is to the mighty dollar....nothing else matters spanone Sep 2014 #2
Now THAT is beyond belief. TwilightGardener Sep 2014 #3
Absolutely disgusting. Laurian Sep 2014 #4
Trent Lott for Russia.. Putin and his supporters are in good hands... Cha Sep 2014 #5
For sale: 2 used US Senators. Bad credit. No credit. No problem.... think Sep 2014 #6
I'm surprised you haven't been alerted on TransitJohn Sep 2014 #7
I think the usage is appropriate groundloop Sep 2014 #12
So do a lot of other people who use the words appropriately in their own posts TransitJohn Sep 2014 #13
I always thought that whores could be male or female. pennylane100 Sep 2014 #26
I've alerted the grammar police since "whores for money" is redundant. PeaceNikki Sep 2014 #28
k&r. Thanks for posting. nm rhett o rick Sep 2014 #8
Politicians lobby for the energy industry? Say it ain't so. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2014 #10
Uh, I'll take Treason for $1000. EEO Sep 2014 #11
How is it treason to legally lobby the government? RB TexLa Sep 2014 #20
What are their DU names? DavidDvorkin Sep 2014 #15
Ha! navarth Sep 2014 #16
hanging us with our own rope, in Lotts' case, lynching us with our own rope. whereisjustice Sep 2014 #17
So America can impose economic sanctions on another country, but can not stop the same Fred Sanders Sep 2014 #19
Can Palestine? salib Sep 2014 #21
China has sanctions on it? And what does Palestine have to put sanctions on, not being a country. Fred Sanders Sep 2014 #22
China because it opposes US sanctions against Russia salib Sep 2014 #24
corporations owned by corrupt foreign dictators and plutocrats are people, my friend nt geek tragedy Sep 2014 #25
Paging Dr. Guillotine . . . paging Dr. Guillotine . . . OldRedneck Sep 2014 #23
I'll wait to see what RT says about this. zappaman Sep 2014 #27
I'm starting to understand why growing numbers on the left and right Blue_Tires Sep 2014 #29

TransitJohn

(6,932 posts)
7. I'm surprised you haven't been alerted on
Tue Sep 2, 2014, 09:07 PM
Sep 2014

Whore is a term highly offensive to and derogatory towards women.

groundloop

(11,519 posts)
12. I think the usage is appropriate
Tue Sep 2, 2014, 09:30 PM
Sep 2014

From vocabulary.com:

In the original sense, a whore is a prostitute: someone who has sex for money. The word has since broadened to mean anyone who is money-hungry.
Whores traditionally whored their bodies out for money. But today a whore can be a person that compromises himself in any kind of way for monetary gain. It's also a nasty thing to call someone (especially a woman) who has a lot of sex and is often used as a vulgar insult similar to bitch. It's not really an appropriate word to call someone, including actual prostitutes.


I'd say Trent Lott fits that description.

TransitJohn

(6,932 posts)
13. So do a lot of other people who use the words appropriately in their own posts
Tue Sep 2, 2014, 09:32 PM
Sep 2014

Last edited Tue Sep 2, 2014, 11:22 PM - Edit history (1)

but get alert stalked for disagreeing with certain people.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
10. Politicians lobby for the energy industry? Say it ain't so.
Tue Sep 2, 2014, 09:19 PM
Sep 2014

And, that's just the top 5.

https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php?ind=E01

Top Recipients, 2013-2014

Candidate Office Amount

Cornyn, John (R-TX) Senate $757,681
Boehner, John (R-OH) House $590,939
McConnell, Mitch (R-KY) Senate $374,208
Landrieu, Mary L (D-LA) Senate $370,586
Gardner, Cory (R-CO) House $302,900

EEO

(1,620 posts)
11. Uh, I'll take Treason for $1000.
Tue Sep 2, 2014, 09:22 PM
Sep 2014

What is the term that best describes what these former senators are doing?

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
19. So America can impose economic sanctions on another country, but can not stop the same
Tue Sep 2, 2014, 10:23 PM
Sep 2014

country from lobbying against the same sanctions, lobbying in America, and hire former American government officials and politicians to help them?

Exceptional.

Who made the rules of this silly game anyway?

Can Iran hire these guys for the same purpose?

salib

(2,116 posts)
24. China because it opposes US sanctions against Russia
Tue Sep 2, 2014, 11:12 PM
Sep 2014

So is likely lobbying against them.

Palestine because many here might actually believe that it should not be able to lobby and others who would feel strongly it should be able to. It is a fulcrum upon which we can weigh what is a good idea.

Anyway, I think that a simple act of Congress (sanctions) should not be confused with freedom of expression (lobbying).

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
29. I'm starting to understand why growing numbers on the left and right
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 03:10 PM
Sep 2014

love our new Russian overlords...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»2 Former Senators/Whores ...