General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMartin Special Prosecutor said that the first thing she did with Trayvon's
parents was pray with them....I for one if I lived in Florida would sue her over thsat. I would not want elected and PUBLICLY paid officials to be praying in my name!!!!!!
mucifer
(23,576 posts)FarPoint
(12,466 posts)Bravo....
gopiscrap
(23,765 posts)it would be my tax dollars paying for that prayer-a viloation of my rights
arcane1
(38,613 posts)gopiscrap
(23,765 posts)on a religious activity
SATIRical
(261 posts)Same with Hospice.
And you realize George Washington had a day of prayer, right?
History and reality are apparently not your friend.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)The Magistrate
(95,258 posts)And that from about as hard an old infidel as can be found on this site.
She did not violate your rights, but it sounds as if you would like to abrogate her's....
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)as a Canadian I am not at all used to public figures wearing religion on their sleeves so this just seems strange. That said what if the accused was Muslim and the victim and prosecutor were Hindu? I need not tell you about the antagonism between those two groups. Would not the introduction of religious sentiments create massive problems?
The Magistrate
(95,258 posts)The action described was among people who apparently share a common religious belief. It imposed nothing on anyone. It probably made the parents of the murdered child feel they could trust this new figure in the case, to share this ritual with her, and such trust in this situation is not guaranteed; these people have excellent reason not to trust Florida law enforcement at this point.
If, on meeting the family, the prosecutor had said, 'let's bow our heads in a prayer to God' and the parents had said something ranging from 'let's not' to 'fine, Mecca's that way' and the prosecutor had proceeded to disregard their expressed sentiments and bow her head to invoke her own particular deity, then we would have a problem. But that is not what happened.
The O.P. seems to be under the belief that separation of church and state requires anyone working for the state to refrain from any religious expression, because some citizens ( myself included ) are not religious. But that is not the case, and is far too extreme a position to be sustained. What cannot be done is to make of prayer an official function, a thing others are compelled to join in, or feel compelled to join in, whether they wish personally to participate in it or not.
uppityperson
(115,681 posts)Your rights! your Rights! omg your rights are being violated!!!111
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Sorry if you thought Trayvon was your son.
I, for one, think that Corey is "in love" with this family - and that may be one reason. Who cares? Other than the fact that they bonded and she will tirelessly seek justice for Trayvon's mom and dad.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)CatWoman
(79,302 posts)but a lot of people find solace in prayer
wandy
(3,539 posts)If Trevon's parents are religious, if the prosecutor is religious then it was right for her to pray with them.
If none are religious then it would be right to sit down over a cup of coffee and give comfort.
This is not the act of a prosecutor. This is the act of a human being.
Something all too rare in this day.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)lamp_shade
(14,847 posts)spanone
(135,902 posts)gopiscrap
(23,765 posts)it also sets apart those who aren't religious...in some indiscernable way, there might be a judgement value placed on them. I am very religious, but I also never want prayer or religion to enter into the civic arena..whose prayer would be used and what theology?
teddy51
(3,491 posts)countingbluecars
(4,766 posts)xchrom
(108,903 posts)WolverineDG
(22,298 posts)because the prosecutor dared to pray with the family.
madaboutharry
(40,234 posts)It is very important for the prosecution to gain the confidence and support of the victim's family, it is very helpful to the process. She was acting in solidarity with his parents. Why would that offend you?
hlthe2b
(102,421 posts)appropriate to the individuals involved? Had they been self-avowed atheists, I suspect she would have found very secular means of comforting them, even if she, herself were religious. There is nothing wrong with either response, but rather something very right when the needs/desires of these grieving people are sensitively addressed.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)... you do what comforts people in distress. Sometimes it's not about "you" ... it's about what other people need.
I would object if she initiated prayer with Trayvon's parents ... however, if they initiated it and she participated in order to give them comfort I would have nothing but praise for her.
K Gardner
(14,933 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)I feel the same way but you explained it perfectly.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)but she was quite emphatic in stressing that her office works for the VICTIM and their family. And if they wanted to pray with her and felt it would provide guidance to help her in her job, then why the fuck would anybody care. It's their call and she complied with their wishes.
Don't read so much into a simple statement.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)it hurting? I am a firm believer of separation of church and state but this was private.
gopiscrap
(23,765 posts)and btw the way I organized and held a pretty big (for Tacoma) prayer vigil at my church the justice for the Martins.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)People in public office are not forbidden to pray, no matter how futile it is. What IS illegal is for them to make US pray.
Big big difference.
uppityperson
(115,681 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)If I were a fundie trying to parody the "separation" crowd, I could do no better than this.
(Mods: not that I'm saying anything sinister about the OP itself, just the language)
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)feel comfortable. I am sure Mrs Martin appreciated her praying with her. By the way that was really nice you had a vigil for him at your church. You at least did something good.
flamingdem
(39,332 posts)The prayer and Rick Scott's appointment have me wondering
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)Zimmerman has a lot of supporters in the GOP and they will not vote for his prosecutor, Democrats will not vote for her because she is too far to the right. While this case will make her a household name I don't think she has elected office in mind, she may have other ambitions however and this case could certainly move her up in the legal world.
gopiscrap
(23,765 posts)prayer is ok for publicly elected and paid officials, might want to rethink it..btw: before you think I am pro Zimmerman, I put together a vigil to call fvor justice for the Martins and held it at a church!
flamingdem
(39,332 posts)we're talking Florida here, they have religious blinders one
uppityperson
(115,681 posts)they want to. Just because you are elected and paid doesn't mean you give up your right to your religious thingies.
K Gardner
(14,933 posts)WolverineDG
(22,298 posts)it ain't all about YOU, ya know.
Solomon
(12,319 posts)Not liking it at all.
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)They're all citizens, and they can do what they want, so long as it doesn't cost ME any additional money and all parties involved are onboard with it. It's not like they were forcing any of us to participate or even watch. It was a private moment and I'll wager it gave the family some comfort.
Now, if she ordered YOU to pray along with them, you'd have something to gripe about.
And I doubt they were praying "in your name"--unless your name happens to be Jesus Christ Almighty.
Big eye roll on this gripe, frankly.
JI7
(89,280 posts)Daniel537
(1,560 posts)H2O Man
(73,637 posts)Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)Seriously, and I sympathize with your cause, this is not helpful.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)I'm an atheist, but I don't see a problem with her statement. There is definitely nothing to sue for.
gopiscrap
(23,765 posts)but, the prayer warriors of the right wing pull this sort of shit all the time...it's an emotionally chartged case and by slipping ion prayer there on the public dime, is one more foot down the slippery slope towards having the thocrats rule our lives. It's gotta be a complete wall-with these fuckers. If she wants to pray with the family and I would love it if she does, then she needs to do it on her own time and not on the taxpayers dime!!!
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)I have never been a government employee or an elected official ... I have had two careers that have involved "up close and personal" interactions with people in distress.
During the course of my work I have been asked by very distraught people to pray with them ... this is not something I do (left to my own devices); however, my response to people in great distress has always been "of course."
It is a small act on my part ... and it brings comfort to those requesting it. Trayvon Martin's family (at least the mom) appear to be very religious ... look at it as the prosecutor offering comfort to a grieving distraught family on your dime.
Do you honestly think it would have served this particular family well if she had refused?
Autumn
(45,120 posts)can be very uplifting and comforting.
Logical
(22,457 posts)uppityperson
(115,681 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)h
uppityperson
(115,681 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)uppityperson
(115,681 posts)etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)If in the course of your duties/work you were confronted be an extremely distraught person that requested that you pray with them ... would you refuse? ... or would you view it as an act of comfort.
I would have very serious problems if an elected official, during the conductance of her duties, requested folk to pray ... but I don't know how one can refuse this act and still convey a sense of sympathy and support to those that request it ... ?
Logical
(22,457 posts)trying to remain neutral and unemotional about the suspect/victim.
I work in private business. Not government.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)I am interested in how one refuses this request and still remain sympathetic?
I too have only worked in the private sector, my personality tends to be very nurturing ... so I can't fathom turning down a request like this (my first career was as a nurse which hopefully explains how this came up again and again for me).
I don't understand how someone can disengage from this request (under the circumstances) without causing discomfort ...?
uppityperson
(115,681 posts)Tikki
(14,560 posts)If she came to my house, I would want it not to be under such tragic circumstances.
Tikki
The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)And Prayer?? OMG I am soooo scared now! Being I am really weak this has made me feel scared and I have converted - praise be to jeebus!
Some people, having beliefs I don't at work and PRAYING on company time? Holy fucking shit - the world will end in 2012.
The outrage. I don't think I will be able to sleep tonight.
I thought it was bad being out of work, no pay or UE for 4 months, car junked, and had to walk 3 miles to a DQ just to apply for a part time job because I don't have more than 3 pennies (which I found on the ground).
Now I see how much worse it could all be and I feel ashamed. Someone was comforting people in a way they felt comfortable with and they work for the government.
Damn.
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)Justice wanted
(2,657 posts)she was probably doing something that would give the parents trust in her. Keep in mind how many days the police and officals sat on there thumbs about finding justice. She wanted to put a HUMAN touch to the office. This was something she did in private with them. It is no different than me sitting at my desk finding out a friend's mother died and offering a moment of "Prayer" with her to comfort her.
There is seperation that needs to be realized the woman doing something publically in front of a judge and a court room and something done in her private office to comfort the victim's family.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)mucifer
(23,576 posts)I'm Jewish. I get sensitive about religious freedoms. But, they have the right to pray and they have the right to say they do so. A horrible thing happened and for them it helps.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)I wouldn't worry about it. If it happened here in California I might feel differently.
frylock
(34,825 posts)i'm an atheist, and IMHO your concern over this "issue" is positively laughable.
Ian David
(69,059 posts)Bluerthanblue
(13,669 posts)get over yourself.
There is plenty to be distressed about in life, you don't need to go looking for silly shit.
'sue her' for what???
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Well that's very different! ...
MrBig
(640 posts)Matariki
(18,775 posts)They are grieving. Get over yourself.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)That really sucks.
Bucky
(54,087 posts)LynneSin
(95,337 posts)There is nothing wrong with a publically elected official praying. I thought it was a very nice thing that she said. Not all religion is hateful and many of us DUers here are Christians.
I'll pray for you to not be so hateful and closeminded when it comes to religion. I know my faith has some real assholes but Jesus was more like us liberals - openminded, accepting and giving to others.
alp227
(32,065 posts)and avoid such activities like the prayer thing in the first place?
WolverineDG
(22,298 posts)The judge, yes, must be impartial to both sides. The prosecutor advocates for the State, taking a decidedly anti-defendant stance in doing so.