General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNFL commissioner Goodell does not rule out Ray Rice return to football: ‘He has paid the price’
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/09/09/nfl-commissioner-goodell-does-not-rule-out-ray-rice-return-to-football-he-has-paid-the-price/National Football League Commissioner Roger Goodell suggested he would consider reinstating former Baltimore Ravens running back Ray Rice in an interview with CBS News.
CBS This Morning host Norah ODonnell posted statements from her interview with Goodell Tuesday evening, including one remark by Goodell saying he felt Rice has paid the price for his apparent attack against then-fiancee Janay Palmer this past February:
Rice was suspended indefinitely from the league and fired from the Ravens after TMZ posted security camera footage of him knocking Palmer out in a New Jersey casino hotel.
more at the link
kcjohn1
(751 posts)I think NFL is very cynical organization out for themselves only with no regard to the public or its players. Anyone who contributes a cent to NFL should really reevaluate and determine if they want to contribute to the exploitation of peoples health (players).
That said, I also hate this "zero tolerance" approach to everything. What Rice did was wrong, and he should be punished. However, I don't see how banishing someone from their livelihood for first time offense makes any sense. If you and I committed a crime, the expectation is once I serve my time/punishment, person is able to make amends, and be part of society again.
leftstreet
(36,109 posts)Jenoch
(7,720 posts)but it is my understwnding he is in a first time offender diversionary program and is undergoing anger management and other counseling. If he is law abiding and follows through with treatment, after a year the conviction will be vacated.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Like many first time offenders, he worked out a deal that involved a non-prison therapeutic / rehabilitative program, the completion of which would wipe the conviction from his record.
edgineered
(2,101 posts)on our swamp buggy team sounds just like you. This weekend when he comes around and says what you just did, and he will, I will simply ask him, "How's your mom?"
He's tough but I'm not worried. He'll think about it for a minute and then he'll get get the point.
dilby
(2,273 posts)Pedophiles and rapist not so much but I do think pretty much everyone else deserves a second chance, if they have paid their debt to society or have served their punishment by their organization.
Response to Beaverhausen (Original post)
Post removed
Beaverhausen
(24,470 posts)otherwise your whole post will be deleted.
edit- told ya so!
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Rice dragged her out like a bag of trash.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5511608
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
YOUR COMMENTS
calls a victim of domestic violence a "gold digging bitch"
JURY RESULTS
A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Tue Sep 9, 2014, 06:16 PM, and voted 4-3 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I agree with the alerter: this post is inappropriate in the extreme. Hide. I could have left it, if the poster had not talked about the woman this awful way. But as it is, HIDE.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Sorry, I disagree with Juror #2
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I'm voting to leave it alone for a couple of reasons.
First, the poster's avatar -- this is a football fan. That should be brought into the mix. Football is a violent sport, and that culture of contained/controlled violence spills over, not just into the players' private lives but into the spectators' lives and perspectives.
Second, I think there's room in the discussion for the members to deal with the sentiments expressed. I don't like the language used either, and I'm not sure I agree with the assessment. But I'm also not sure I disagree. We're able to joke and sneer and wink at a "trophy wife" but women are called names because they look for a partner who can offer them wealth, status, prestige? That's part of the double standard that applies here.
And third, maybe someone will bring up the fact that it's all going to hinge on how much the NFL stands to make, in cold hard cash, from Ray Rice. They let Michael Vick back in, didn't they?
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: She is a victim, and that comment was uncalled for. Victims of domestic violence are often more afraid of the abuser than of anything else. You know nothing about her.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Agree with alerter.
alp227
(32,037 posts)Sheesh. I've believed for a long time that Freepers, Conservative Cavemen, and other disruptors sign up to serve on juries dishonestly and make DU look bad...boom. Looks like here's a smoking gun.
Cha
(297,378 posts)nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)#2, they both voted to leave. So where's the disagreement?
Cha
(297,378 posts)Especially since they're both idiots. Thank goodness for the Four Hides.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)Mail Message
On Tue Sep 9, 2014, 06:08 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Rice dragged her out like a bag of trash.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5511608
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
calls a victim of domestic violence a "gold digging bitch"
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Sep 9, 2014, 06:16 PM, and the Jury voted 4-3 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I agree with the alerter: this post is inappropriate in the extreme. Hide. I could have left it, if the poster had not talked about the woman this awful way. But as it is, HIDE.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Sorry, I disagree with Juror #2
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I'm voting to leave it alone for a couple of reasons.
First, the poster's avatar -- this is a football fan. That should be brought into the mix. Football is a violent sport, and that culture of contained/controlled violence spills over, not just into the players' private lives but into the spectators' lives and perspectives.
Second, I think there's room in the discussion for the members to deal with the sentiments expressed. I don't like the language used either, and I'm not sure I agree with the assessment. But I'm also not sure I disagree. We're able to joke and sneer and wink at a "trophy wife" but women are called names because they look for a partner who can offer them wealth, status, prestige? That's part of the double standard that applies here.
And third, maybe someone will bring up the fact that it's all going to hinge on how much the NFL stands to make, in cold hard cash, from Ray Rice. They let Michael Vick back in, didn't they?
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: She is a victim, and that comment was uncalled for. Victims of domestic violence are often more afraid of the abuser than of anything else. You know nothing about her.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Agree with alerter.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)While he's locked up he's prevented from looking for the real killer.
While the Juice is in prison the real killer is roaming golf courses free.
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)dsc
(52,164 posts)that said, I don't think he was married to Nicole during that time, though I might be wrong on that.
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)City Lights
(25,171 posts)Wow, that was fast!
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)Just wtf?!?
Generic Brad
(14,275 posts)If both organizations were serious about domestic violence, he and his ilk would have been booted from the league on the first offense - especially one captured on film.
My feeling about all of this is that they all wanted to believe his b.s. explanation and sweep it under the rug with a bogus contrition presser and a two game suspension. But once TMZ aired the actual incident, his story fell apart and the higher ups were embarrassed for getting caught in a half assed investigation that was never intended to get to the truth. The big shots were exposed, so someone had to take the fall and they fired Ray Rice.
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)lol
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)is back in an NFL uniform before the end of the season.
Response to Beaverhausen (Original post)
bullwinkle428 This message was self-deleted by its author.
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)He'll go to counseling. He'll keep his nose clean. His wife will continue to support him. He'll apologize over and over again. The fury with the public will calm down (as it did with the Vick). And someone is going to need a running back and will be willing to give him a shot.
We've seen this cycle before many times. It's not new.