Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1338 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (15)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Snorting Koch (Original Post)
eridani
Sep 2014
OP
Here's a clearer version, without the jpeg artifacting from being sloppily resized
Electric Monk
Sep 2014
#1
Not seeing a difference. But then I am a stick in the mud with Windows XP and IE8 n/t
eridani
Sep 2014
#2
I notice them around the eyebrows and jowls in particular. They're there in the resized one. nt
Electric Monk
Sep 2014
#9
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)1. Here's a clearer version, without the jpeg artifacting from being sloppily resized
eridani
(51,907 posts)2. Not seeing a difference. But then I am a stick in the mud with Windows XP and IE8 n/t
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)4. Yes, it is a bit better but
certainly not worth denigrating the poster that went through the work to post it for by calling it sloppily resized, Why not just teach how to improve the image for a post?
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)5. Neither image looks artifacted on my monitor.
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)7. Mine is 1920 x 1200, and I can easily tell the difference.
Another sign the pic in the OP was messed with poorly is the text in the top left corner was inverted and left a bit of a ghost where the black box had been originally.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)8. 2560x1440 on one, 2560x1600 on the other and no problems.
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)9. I notice them around the eyebrows and jowls in particular. They're there in the resized one. nt
Gothmog
(145,321 posts)3. Great cartoon
merrily
(45,251 posts)6. The only politician I can recall attacking the Koch brothers on
national TV is Senator Bernie Sanders.
He's done it on MSNBC and, when MTP finally had to give him air time, he did on NBC.
If you want to sign a petition or post on facebook encouraging him to run for President, please go to this OP.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025534410
As for Mitch, I believe and hope he is on his way out of the Senate.