General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIntegrity Disqualifies Sanders for White House--mournfuly reported by Andy Borowitz
WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)The Vermont Senator Bernie Sanderss potential bid for the 2016 Presidency was declared over, on Monday, before it even began, because of a key feature of the American political system that makes a person with integrity ineligible for the White House.
According to some experts, the electoral system has developed a number of safeguards over the past few decades to prevent someone with independence and backbone from occupying the Presidency.
Bernie Sanderss failure to become a member of either major political party excludes him from the network of cronyism and backroom deals required under our system to be elected, said Davis Logsdon, a political scientist at the University of Minnesota. Though that failure alone would disqualify Sanders, the fact that he is not beholden to a major corporate interest or investment bank would also make him ineligible.
Because of his ineligibility, Logsdon said, the Vermont Senator would be unable to fund-raise the one billion dollars required under the current system to run for President. The best source of a billion dollars is billionaires, and Sanders has alienated them, he said. Clearly he didnt think this through.
Logsdon said that Sanders might persist in his quest for the White House despite his ineligibility but that such an effort would be doomed to fail. Our political system has been refined over the years specifically to keep people like Bernie Sanders out of the White House, he said. The system works.
www.borowitzreport.com
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)Asshole satirist!
Nevada Blue
(130 posts)Jonathan Swift lives.
riversedge
(70,242 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)Brother Buzz
(36,444 posts)And it's a damn good jab, too.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)riversedge
(70,242 posts)I ventured the first sentences. and yes, I also believe it to be true
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)I too wonder at our shortage of candidates able to raise the hundreds of millions needed to run, while being able to repeatedly say to the camera, and the crowds, that they are running so as to represent those who have been getting short changed.
To say it convincingly, as if they believed it themselves. Perhaps it's the air in the rooms that the millionaire donors, and the major lobbyists, congregate in. It could be that the atmosphere in those rooms requires an adaptation that only a few hardy souls are capable of pulling off.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Seems to me it points out exactly why Americans should support Bernie by the millions!
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)Only because it's too true.
Well...ok, I did grin sardonically .
tclambert
(11,087 posts)In the founders' day, it cost thousands of dollars to run for president. Only those with very wealthy friends could raise such exorbitant sums. And you had to own a horse. With inflation, it now costs a cool billion. And your campaign has to own a jet plane.
In another two hundred years, you'll need a quadrillion dollars to run, and your own starship.
valerief
(53,235 posts)onecaliberal
(32,863 posts)It's what we're going to get. This whole article makes me want to hurl.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)I knew it was Andy Borowitz, but the look on Bernie's face was just too convincing. By the second paragraph, I was chuckling. I wonder if that was taken just after his filibuster? Go Bernie!
True Blue Door
(2,969 posts)but being right is not the same thing as being able to do a specific job. I've seen no evidence that he values achievement over idle philosophizing.