Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

meegbear

(25,438 posts)
Mon Sep 15, 2014, 03:13 PM Sep 2014

The Rude Pundit: Graham with the Wind

Flouncing debutante Lindsey Graham, always sounding like he's pining for Ashley Wilkes, went on Fox "news" Sunday yesterday with substitute host John "Not the Supreme Court Justice" Roberts. Graham lost his pretty little mind when it came to the Islamic State (ISIS, ISIL, whatever, fuck 'em). Talking about President Obama's response to the terrorist group's violence, Graham said, "This is a turning point in the war in terror. We're fighting a terrorist army, not an organization. It's going to take an army to beat an army. And this idea we'll never have any boots on the ground to defeat them in Syria is fantasy. And all this has come home to roost over the last three years of incompetent decisions, so to destroy ISIL, what I was told or what I heard in your interview won't even come close to destroy ISIL. It's delusional in the way they approach this."

You really have to watch or listen to it to get the full feeling, like he just needs to make a dress out of those curtains to look pretty for his man. It's also fun to see Democratic Senator Jack Reed try to rationally state a case for the United States to act in the way Obama laid out.

Graham would have none of it. "This is a radical Islamic army, that's pushing the theory of a master religion, not a master race like the Nazis. This is not about bringing a few people to justice who behead the innocent in a brutal fashion. It's about protecting millions of people throughout the world from a radical Islamic army," the good Senator from South Car'lina said. And, goddamnit, the brutes are gonna burn Atlanta: "they will open the gates of hell to spill out on the world." Prissy would slapped his face and told him to calm the fuck down.

What does Graham want? He wants soldiers, American soldiers, on the ground, not just in the air: "I will not let this president suggest to the American people we can outsource our security and this is not about our safety. There is no way in hell you can form an army on the ground to go into Syria, to destroy ISIL without a substantial American component...This is a war we're fighting, it is not a counterterrorism operation."

Not once did Roberts suggest that because Graham was such a huge supporter of the previous war, which is what brought us ISIL in the first place, that he should shut his fucking mouth. In fact, Graham wants you to know that he's always correct: "Apparently nobody has been listening to what Senator McCain and I have been saying for the last three years. We said train the Free Syrian Army so they can take this fight on." Well, maybe we can put a self-destruct timer on the weapons we give them so that they're not used on us in few years, like the Mujahideen and Saddam Hussein did.

More dead and injured Americans, that's what Graham is calling for. It's not enough that nearly an entire generation of soldiers will have had their brains fucked by their war experiences. Now he wants more. It's like he has a fetish for visiting wounded soldiers, like he needs to go to Walter Reed and touch the boys on their stumps, hear their labored breathing, smell the gels used on their burns, exult in their nightmares, like he just wants to go home after and gently, oh, so gently touch himself, just enough to get a hard-on, not enough to orgasm, just a finger or two stroking his dick as he gets lost in the sensory overload, like Scarlett fantasizing about getting roughly balled by Rhett Butler.

http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/2014/09/graham-with-wind.html

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Rude Pundit: Graham with the Wind (Original Post) meegbear Sep 2014 OP
I hope Jon Stewart does a bit in this underpants Sep 2014 #1
"Yup" mindwalker_i Sep 2014 #6
Isn't Graham the Chickenhawk who smeared Cleland the war hero? riqster Sep 2014 #2
Graham probably did, too, but the main offender in that regard was the vile Saxby Chambliss Glorfindel Sep 2014 #3
My error. riqster Sep 2014 #4
Oh noes! Not the gates of hell! gratuitous Sep 2014 #5
I don't know if I loathe McLame or Graham more...knr joeybee12 Sep 2014 #7

Glorfindel

(9,730 posts)
3. Graham probably did, too, but the main offender in that regard was the vile Saxby Chambliss
Mon Sep 15, 2014, 04:08 PM
Sep 2014

an even more repugnant "senator" from my native state, Georgia, which (I pray) is finally coming to its senses politically.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
5. Oh noes! Not the gates of hell!
Mon Sep 15, 2014, 05:11 PM
Sep 2014

Worse than those stubborn collar stains. Ten thousand bloodthirsty villains, ready to pounce on an unsuspecting and defenseless* planet! What, oh what, ever shall we do? Fiddle dee dee! Save us, Lindsay. Lawdy, won't no one save us?!

*Well, except for a dozen or so nuclear arsenals that could vaporize those villains in about 30 minutes from any number of sites.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Rude Pundit: Graham w...