General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHoly Shit! Jan Brewer actually signed it. Life now begins 2 weeks before conception in Arizona.
That's right, boys and girls. In Arizona Mr. Sperm doesn't even have to encounter Ms. Egg in order for Arizona Repugs to insert themselves into a woman's reproductive process. According to the law that Brewer signed, gestational age now is deemed to have begun on the first day of the last menstrual period of a pregnant woman. Abso-fucking-lutely IMPOSSIBLE, you say? Nope. In Arizona if you become pregnant, then by law it happened two weeks before you actually had intercourse.
You can't make this shit up.
teddy51
(3,491 posts)Initech
(100,103 posts)I don't even think bat shit fucking crazy does either - this is a whole new level of insanity. I've come to define republicanism lately as.a "glorious lack of empathy" and it's been showing.
K Gardner
(14,933 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)WTF is wrong with that state?
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)which is telling.
Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)Things are getting so insane that they can't come up with farces that are as outrageous as real life.
I wish it was a joke.
pokerfan
(27,677 posts)"Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is impossible to create a parody of fundamentalism that someone won't mistake for the real thing."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)I will stop now.
bananas
(27,509 posts)Because even though they aren't pregnant, legally, they are.
spanone
(135,876 posts)aquart
(69,014 posts)Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)Mister Ed
(5,944 posts)so, umm...if life legally begins with the twinkle in Dad's eye, then, umm...what if he wears sunglasses? Could he be charged with infanticide?
Just wondering.
nolabear
(41,991 posts)Drugs in her system? Risky behavior (like skiing, sky diving, getting a ticket for speeding)? It's getting just TOO damned Margaret Atwood around here for me.
Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)if anyone wants an abortion, the fetus will be deemed older than it is---meaning that the first trimester would end earlier than it should.
And yes, one day soon we will be living The Handmaiden's Tale. And I thought that book was really out there.
robinlynne
(15,481 posts)Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)the bill limits abortions to only up to 20 weeks after conception. So when you add that additional couple of weeks, they are cutting the time even more.
http://www.wildcat.arizona.edu/index.php/article/2012/04/legislature_bans_abortions_20_weeks_after_conception
Or, since there are a few bills on this same topic, this could be a separate one....but they all go hand in hand.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)Guttmacher: http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/spib_OAL.pdf
The new legislation: http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/50leg/2r/summary/h.hb2036_concurrefusememo.doc.htm
Looks like Guttmacher needs an update.
Fortunately "life of the woman" remains intact, which doctors may use their discretion.
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)They need to check their own word choices.
Conception still does not equal ovulation even if they claim that is when life starts.
Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)Their definition of when conception occurs is the first day of the last menstral cycle. This means that they are saying conception happens BEFORE ovulation even occurs. Incredible.
GeorgeGist
(25,323 posts)is in the eye of the beholder. Methinks the govt of Arizona is nonsense.
robinlynne
(15,481 posts)11 Bravo
(23,926 posts)of the first trimester; thus making any medical diagnosis indicating the need for a therapeutic abortion more difficult to arrive at, while at the same time making access to a legal abortion more difficult to obtain.
Mimosa
(9,131 posts)I used to think The Handmaiden's Tale was over the top. No longer.
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)Don't worry. People who are "freaking out" are never asked for their opinions.
lapislzi
(5,762 posts)There is every possibility, likelihood, even, that it will be abused in this manner.
Really, all they wanted to do was to shave another 2 weeks off the 20-week abortion ban. The law makes you 20 weeks when you're really only 18 or even less.
Medically unsound, sheer idiocy.
malaise
(269,157 posts)She should be institutionalized
Tell everyone that cares or voted for you, what you think. Talk is easy!
Thats an intelligent comment w/o any backing or follow up. What's you're history, education, backround?
malaise
(269,157 posts)and remember to let me know your favorite flowers.
LisaL
(44,974 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)You define it. Know it all, genius!!!
damyank913
(787 posts)Maybe never?
muntrv
(14,505 posts)-..__...
(7,776 posts)send her cum encrusted paper towels and dare her to extradite the person on murder chargers.
On second thought... don't use jism (The Feds/USPS frowns upon sending hazardous/infectious materials through the mail... especially to politicians).
Use dried yogurt instead.
lastlib
(23,287 posts)Beartracks
(12,821 posts)SPERM can be replaced!
Go ahead and waste 'em, boys; we'll make more!
================
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)You of course know the answers up north.
frankroberts
(35 posts)longship
(40,416 posts)BTW, every sperm is sacred.
Glimmer of Hope
(5,823 posts)Does not compute.
eyeofnewt
(146 posts)Where are Republican women? Why can't they stand up just once? This isn't even about agreeing or disagreeing with abortion, it's plain crazy and stupid! I'd be ashamed to proclaim this as fair, decent or rational.....or try to cloak it in religion.
atreides1
(16,093 posts)It was the bat shit crazy voters who put these people in office...all based on their fear of that black man in the White House...the people of Arizona are now under religious laws disguised as keeping women safe...
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)Kinda debating my move to AZ.
anti-alec
(420 posts)Until the BS crazy goes away, you'd be stuck in red hell.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)...I dunno.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)Really, don't they have some kind of recall laws?
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)emulatorloo
(44,183 posts)Safetykitten
(5,162 posts)Confusious
(8,317 posts)Arizona is run by Phoenix. What they say goes for pretty much the state. If their wacky asses want her, they get her.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)that is women who will be adversely affected by this.
Confusious
(8,317 posts)So no matter how bad it gets, there will always be boot lickers.
bluedigger
(17,087 posts)I never liked my Zodiac sign.
RevStPatrick
(2,208 posts)...instead of a Scorpio?
But I don't WANNA be a Libra!!!
I LIKE being a Scorpio!!!
mikeytherat
(6,829 posts)But I like being a Scorpio.
mikey_the_rat
elias7
(4,026 posts)A normal pregnancy lasts 280 days from your LNMP (last normal menstrual period) which is about 266 days from conception to birth. The first two weeks of your pregnancy includes the time of your period, ovulation and fertilization. Conception occurs approximately 14 - 16 days after the first day of your last menstrual period.
Since the date of conception is not always known and can vary between women, the date of LNMP is known by most women so doctors use this date as a starting point for pregnancy. From your LNMP they will add 280 days and this will give your Estimated Due Date. In general, all doctors agree that pregnancies, when using the LNMP dating technique, average approximately 280 days or 40 weeks.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)Leave it to the Republicans to make law based on antiquated dating methods (which no doubt were useful 200 years ago, but these days? OK).
Pathwalker
(6,599 posts)The date of my last period?
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)HeiressofBickworth
(2,682 posts)When 280 days LNMP is used for calculation, it is a result of additional days being added only for calculation purposes. An actual pregnancy still takes only 266 days.
If that's the case, then the AZ law should be ADDING days, not reducing actual time. So the law allowing abortion should read 22 weeks, not 20, since they want to calculate from LNMP.
DeeJay
(78 posts)Tikki
(14,559 posts)each menstrual cycle and file for Social Security numbers for their potentials and also
take out life insurance policies for each of their possibilities.
Tikki
jillan
(39,451 posts)I want to see a law passed that men have to report every time they masturbated and wasted perfectly good sperm.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)Jello Biafra
(439 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Confusious
(8,317 posts)Don't want no gub'ment teat sucking worthless eaters.
Now has anyone seen my social security check and Medicaid medication?
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)well being of a baby after birth. Once a newborn takes a breath, they cease to care.
Mendocino
(7,506 posts)then you better crawl back into the womb.
derby378
(30,252 posts)O Arizona, how far you have fallen.
Ginny and I had so many happy memories of the Grand Canyon. Now I don't know when I can ever go back.
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)It's a shame that brains are so underrated.
canuckledragger
(1,666 posts)for psychiatric reasons or such?
I mean..this flies right in the face of proven science..is dementia setting in early or something?
mysuzuki2
(3,521 posts)value of pi as an even 3 to make math easier.
mbuch64
(55 posts)This is what the right will use to outlaw the birth control pill. One state at a time
the tea party/taliban is gunning for our rights.
We better stand up and be loud and uncompromising with these people.
This can not be allowed to happen in our country.
Iris
(15,667 posts)Fascism, anyone?
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)I feel like I fell down the rabbit hole.....
-..__...
(7,776 posts)sometimes I wonder if they actually believe this shit, or just do it out of spite/create a shit storm/force a Supreme Court case (the Internet porn bill as another recent example).
There's a method to their madness and I'm betting on the latter.
liberalhistorian
(20,819 posts)was the internet porn bill?
-..__...
(7,776 posts)it's a bill that would prohibit certain language/speech on the Internet...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/04/arizona-bill-criminalize-online-speech_n_1404038.html
Justice wanted
(2,657 posts)gender and to her DAUGHTERS and GRANDDAUGHTERS!!!
No the B****** just threw all females under the fuckin train after she tied their hands.
This basically outlaws contraception and could possibly make miscarriages something to be looked into. Didn't know you where pregnant went had beer/drink with friends only to find out a week later you are with child than something happens --oh let's say nature correcting itself and now you are in trouble because your friend puts a picture of you having a drink when you thought you weren't pregnant.
(OR am I wrong?)
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)YellowRubberDuckie
(19,736 posts)Because periods slough off eggs, sometimes fertilized eggs. This also outlaws miscarriages. I don't even think they understand the SCIENCE behind pregnancy.
Next women are going to go to jail for having the wrong gender.
Justice wanted
(2,657 posts)benld74
(9,909 posts)The Wizard
(12,548 posts)give up smoking crack.
felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)but these idiots do not think things through. These people are certifiably insane and have to be stopped--young girls are going to die because this ruling.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)sure it will be a nightmare to enforce.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)a hard core capitalists, Libertarian type (I always think of Penn Gillette when I think of him) and so we have always enjoyed very spirited debates when we get together.
So anyway, as always the topic of politics arose and I have never seen him so visibly change, I swear he looked like a balloon deflating. He is just at his wits end. He literally has no idea what happened, the whole party has gone insane, "what the hell are they thinking?", the Democrats are going to take back the House and increase their majority in the Senate, and best of all, "Thug, you're right. I can't even try to defend this shit any more".
Now remember, this is a man for whom the system has worked beautifully.
My only concern is that now he may well register as a Democrat (which explains a lot of the stuff I see written here).
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)OUTLAW ORAL SEX!
TheKentuckian
(25,029 posts)but often absurdity impresses certain points where facts and well constructed arguments can find no fertile soil.
It might seem like all hell is breaking loose and maybe it is but the tendency to overplay the hand when all eyes are on the table is strong with them.
This is just the kind of stupid that acts like WD40 on a long stuck gear and once the light comes on, it seldom goes back out. Before it is said and done, I bet quite a few with two brain cells to rub together will come to a very different outlook than they have now, they may never get all the way to where some are but there will be some backing off the plate and even some walking away.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)you are looking at the near future of the whole country unless we start shooting back at some point.
glinda
(14,807 posts)Kablooie
(18,641 posts)Then I move that they should make conception start at the birth of the woman.
liberalhistorian
(20,819 posts)these bataloons any ideas now!!!! At this point, I wouldn't put ANYTHING past them anymore!
burrowowl
(17,648 posts)Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)According to Wikipedia -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oogenesis#Human_Oogenesis -- the process of generating primary oocytes is completed before or shortly after birth. These primary oocytes aren't yet viable ova, however. Further biological processes are necessary, which don't begin until puberty.
The science in the Wikipedia article is daunting, but it may mean that your suggestion needs to be modified. Conception shouldn't start when the woman is born, but only when she reaches puberty.
libodem
(19,288 posts)How?
Gemini Cat
(2,820 posts)She really hates women.
Zoeisright
(8,339 posts)Arizona, Texas, and Florida being the top three. For exactly theses reasons. I will not give money to mouth-breathers who are mean, cruel, stupid, nosy, and ignorant.
Joe the Liberal
(2,789 posts)Republicans, getting the government off your back and sticking it in your uterus.
Beartracks
(12,821 posts)NuttyFluffers
(6,811 posts)i think it does, because it's a life in potential, right?
oooh! does that also make men forced to fertilize ovulating women so as to avert women from unconsciously aborting life?
oh my, arizona is spiraling into exciting parallel universe territory. fascinating.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)and your last menstrual period was 6 months ago, yet you discover you are pregnant? It happens.
Namvet67
(111 posts)kdmorris
(5,649 posts)And it's not just in Arizona. If you become pregnant ANYWHERE that has relatively good medical care, then you are considered to have been pregnant two weeks before conception.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gestational_age
Women who go through IVF know that this is how the gestational age will be determined and it's standard practice, when moving to an OB from the reproductive endocrinologist, to just count back 14 days from the day of retrieval, even if that's not really the day of your last menstrual period. Because this practice has been around forever (all of my daughters' gestational ages were calculated from the first day of the last menstrual period in the 1980s, 1990s).
They are just further using that definition to limit the amount of time a woman can get an abortion - EVEN if she knows exactly when she got pregnant. Considering all of the other offensive bullshit in this amendment (forced ultrasounds, minors requiring consent, no abortions after 12 week gestational age) it's surprising that this one line in the bill is what everyone is upset about.
http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/50leg/2r/adopted/s.2036jud.pdf
BlueIris
(29,135 posts)Location: Arizona.
Freaks. Freaks, every one of them.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Barry Goldwater, spinning dervish-like in his grave.
"Todays so-called conservatives dont even know what the word means. They think Ive turned liberal because I believe a woman has a right to an abortion. Thats a decision thats up to the pregnant woman, not up to the pope or some do-gooders or the Religious Right. Its not a conservative issue at all" - Barry Goldwater
KansDem
(28,498 posts)Can another "dependent" be claimed if a man and woman think they're going to have sex in a couple of weeks?
This needs answered right away. April 15 is only two days away!
Safetykitten
(5,162 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)... and how dare you question gawd's will? Gawd intended for women to be incubators to be used at the will and control of men. Geezuz said so in the Babble, which id gawd's own words! Are you one of those Leftie Commies or what?
^^^(Just in case it's needed)^^^
Rozlee
(2,529 posts)I've always found the bible singularly lacking in compassion for both the pregnant mother and the unborn. Witness the death sentence Tamar got in Genesis when patriarch, Judah, discovered her pregnant out of wedlock. No waiting until the bab(ies) were born, just immediate death by burning. Lucky for Tamar, she outed Judah as the father. And the Prophet Hosea ordered Israelis to kill the Samarian pregnant women; "rip open their bellies" and "dash their little ones' heads against rocks." Not to mention the ordeal of Sotah, or the drinking of Bitter Waters, to make a woman abort if her husband accused her of being pregnant by another man's child. Horrible book. Every time someone calls it "The Good Book" I feel like hurling green pea soup.
deacon
(5,967 posts)tanyev
(42,615 posts)Swede Atlanta
(3,596 posts)this law is to punish all the women that didn't put out for those fat, old, white legislators at the um-pah convention in Phoenix last year. "That'll show em" not to let us fool around on our wives (possibly multiple wives).
Beartracks
(12,821 posts)Oh, look ----> <--- This couple can now claim an Arizona state tax deduction because they're getting ready to have sex!
============================
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)veness
(413 posts)....from so many important issues.
pink-o
(4,056 posts)caseymoz
(5,763 posts)I'm sure 300 years from now they'll be laughing. However, right now, if you're pro-choice and laughing instead of outraged, you're stupid.
The pro-choice, pro-reproductive rights people are in retreat now, and they'd better change strategies fast. What's so sad here is, the Pro-choicers have squandered a winning position (just as NORML did in the '70s) because from NARAL on down, they were afraid, yes, afraid, to find their message and stick with it.
MY ADVICE TO FELLOW PRO-CHOICERS:
What I suggest is: stop accusing the other side of misogyny or chauvinism. Yes, it is their actual the motive. They show it repeatedly with their proposals and with Freudian Gaffs. However, socially and politically, accusing them of it is a loser, because misogyny appears to be mostly an unconscious motive. Therefore, by definition, Anti-choicers can neither acknowledge it as their main drive, nor change it without serious psychiatric treatment. Moreover, since they don't see that motive in themselves, it means other people often can't see it either. So their arguments will have sway with the populace if the message is simple enough and follow principles of propaganda.
Stop deconstructing anti-choicer motives. This gains nothing except accolades from other Pro-choicers.
Instead, we have to start meeting and beating Anti-choicer's propaganda with a simple counter-argument. Here it is: a zygote is a child, not a person. A fetus is not a child not a person. Say that enough and point to this simple evidence: You take a fetus out of the womb, it dies. You put a child back in the womb, the child dies. You could follow it with things like: if the fetus were a person, your duty would be to rescue it from the womb, because if its a person, the one of the worst prisons you could imaginable.
You could say other things to counter the religious argument. Such as, "God is not going to punish our nation for abortion." He hasn't done it to any other nation.
And keep it as basic and simple as their slogan: "Life begins at conception." As nonsensical as that statement is, it follows the rules of propaganda, that is: it's simple, and they repeat it year after year. Over time, unopposed, it has gained converts and rallied them.
You might cite scientific evidence when you actually debate, because the science is on the our side, but remember keep the basic message simple and just repeat it. That's what's important.
You can't do anything against their unconscious motives, but you can disarm them by attacking the conscious rationalizations. Misogyny can't gain a foothold without a conscious cover story like protecting "the sanctity of life." Stay on topic. Start trying to meet and beat Anti-choicers own arguments.
All is not lost yet, but sheesh, we've lost so much. Pro-choicers: get your act together. Start taking responsibility for a socio-political contest that is yours to lose.
As it is, if I were a young woman, I would leave Arizona, and Oklahoma. I suggest hetero- and bisexual women do this in protest. Definitely, don't have sex with men in states passing laws like theirs. That will at least keep the issue in the forefront.
Devil_Fish
(1,664 posts)12 dependents a year on your taxes.
Just about any female can qualify for food stamps now!
Out laws should look out, they kill a woman who isn't menstraiting, thats double homocide right there.
Do they have car pool lanes in AZ?
Generic Brad
(14,275 posts)Where are the sane voters in Arizona?
You know the answer? She has to deal with it, so easy to criticize. Tell us about life, when it begins, how its to be dealt with, what state ordained u their spokesperon?