General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo a man who had killed one of his sons in a hunting accident
and who spent three years in prison - a convicted felon - killed his daughter and her six children (aged 11 years to 10 weeks)
According to officials, there were several calls to this house over a long period of time.
How was he allowed to own guns?
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/don-spirit-kills-daughter-six-grandchildren-bell-florida-n206861
<snip>
A convicted felon fatally shot his daughter and six grandchildren before killing himself in a Florida home Thursday, police said. The shooter, who was identified as 51-year-old Don Spirit, took his own life after police officers arrived at the residence in Bell, outside Gainesville, Gilchrist County Sheriff Robert Schultz said. Schultz said that authorities found the seven victims "all over on the property." They included a 10-week-old baby.
Spirit already had a lengthy criminal record stretching back 22 years, according to Florida corrections records. Reports from 2003 show that one charge, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, came after he pleaded guilty to accidentally shooting and killing his 8-year-old son while they were out hunting. He was sentenced to three years in prison. Spirit was also convicted of depriving a child of food and shelter, battery, and possession of drug paraphernalia between 1992 and 1995. Schultz said officers had previously "been out to that residence on numerous law enforcement occasions." The victims were identified as Sarah Lorraine Spirit, 28, and her daughters Alanna Stewart, 2½ months, Brandon Stewart, 4, Destiny Stewart, 5, and Kylie Kuhlmann, 9, and sons Johnathon Kuhlmann, 8, and Kaleb Kuhlmann, 11. "This is something you can't explain," Schultz said at a press conference. "I will continue to ask everybody to pray for the families."
-------------------------
Of course you can explain it Schultz - he should not have been allowed to have a weapon.
Arkansas Granny
(31,519 posts)malaise
(269,056 posts)The NRA preys while mourners and sympathizers pray.
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)cause any problems?
Arkansas Granny
(31,519 posts)If prayer brings comfort to the families, then pray. However, all the prayers in the world won't change the incidence of gun violence. We need to look for preventative measures and there might be fewer families grieving over these gruesome events.
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)handmade34
(22,756 posts)prayer "does not preclude the violence" and it does nothing afterwards...
righteous anger is much more effective than prayer...
prayer is an excuse, a "let's just give up because we can't do anything about it"
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)MH1
(17,600 posts)Iggo
(47,558 posts)Well, I guess "distraction" isn't exactly nothing.
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)any time something religious is mentioned.
CanonRay
(14,104 posts)Pray for the family, pray the gay away, pray for our boys overseas.....makes me sick.
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)I am a woman of faith, and have found prayer to be a great source of comfort in times of trouble.
However, prayer should NOT relieve the rest of us of the responsibility to find better ways to PREVENT gun violence.
We are a community of human beings.
There has to be a better way.
I believe my prayers on the topic will go to "strength for the courage to stand up against greed and fear" in the ongoing battle to prevent this type of carnage.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)He already had one charge of illegally owning a gun, but owning a gun seems to be as easy, and difficult to control, as owning an unregistered car or a bag of crack.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Hard to see how this tragedy is avoided by telling a psychotic murderer he can't have guns
shenmue
(38,506 posts)Not that hard to do.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)That's the problem. They are everywhere, impossible to effectively regulate and cheaply available.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)But he did anyway.
sendero
(28,552 posts)... think that if there were just MORE laws, perhaps he would have obeyed them. It's ridiculous.
Here folks is the poster child for why gun regulation is USELESS.
malaise
(269,056 posts)We need to find out if the cops who showed up there several times ever searched for or removed illegal guns.
sendero
(28,552 posts)... probable cause.
In any event the vast majority of people who own guns in defiance of the law never come in contract with the police except perhaps after they have used them to commit a crime.
People with a criminal mindset, the very people you are afraid of, are not going to concern themselves with piddly laws. If you are willing to murder someone it's not likely that you are concerned with posession laws.
malaise
(269,056 posts)Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)Unless he was still on probation there was no legal justification for searching for guns, no more than there would be for searching for drugs in the home of someone with a past conviction.
Logical
(22,457 posts)eggplant
(3,911 posts)People still rob banks, even though that is illegal, too. We should probably get rid of those laws as well.
Response to eggplant (Reply #9)
Post removed
eggplant
(3,911 posts)Can't make an argument? Then be sure to speak poorly of the opposition.
Skittles
(153,169 posts)when the logic simply is not there, why bother?
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Demeter
(85,373 posts)Since so many banks engage in criminal activities that don't even get prosecuted....it's a win-win!
Skittles
(153,169 posts)why can't we all just SEE that?
Sancho
(9,070 posts)This is my generic response to gun threads where people are shot and killed by the dumb or criminal possession of guns. For the record, I grew up in the South and on military bases. I was taught about firearms as a child, and I grew up hunting, was a member of the NRA, and I still own guns. In the 70s, I dropped out of the NRA because they become more radical and less interested in safety and training. Some personal experiences where people I know were involved in shootings caused me to realize that anyone could obtain and posses a gun no matter how illogical it was for them to have a gun. Also, easy access to more powerful guns, guns in the hands of children, and guns that werent secured are out of control in our society. As such, heres what I now think ought to be the requirements to possess a gun. Im not debating the legal language, I just think its the reasonable way to stop the shootings. Notice, none of this restricts the type of guns sold. This is aimed at the people who shoot others, because its clear that they should never have had a gun.
1.) Anyone in possession of a gun (whether they own it or not) should have a regularly renewed license. If you want to call it a permit, certificate, or something else that's fine.
2.) To get a license, you should have a background check, and be examined by a professional for emotional and mental stability appropriate for gun possession. It might be appropriate to require that examination to be accompanied by references from family, friends, employers, etc. This check is not to subject you to a mental health diagnosis, just check on your superficial and apparent gun-worthyness.
3.) To get the license, you should be required to take a safety course and pass a test appropriate to the type of gun you want to use.
4.) To get a license, you should be over 21. Under 21, you could only use a gun under direct supervision of a licensed person and after obtaining a learners license. Your license might be restricted if you have children or criminals or other unsafe people living in your home. (If you want to argue 18 or 25 or some other age, fine. 21 makes sense to me.)
5.) If you possess a gun, you would have to carry a liability insurance policy specifically for gun ownership - and likely you would have to provide proof of appropriate storage, security, and whatever statistical reasons that emerge that would drive the costs and ability to get insurance.
6.) You could not purchase a gun or ammunition without a license, and purchases would have a waiting period.
7.) If you possess a gun without a license, you go to jail, the gun is impounded, and a judge will have to let you go (just like a DUI).
8.) No one should carry an unsecured gun (except in a locked case, unloaded) when outside of home. Guns should be secure when transporting to a shooting event without demonstrating a special need. Their license should indicate training and special circumstances beyond recreational shooting (security guard, etc.).
9.) If you buy, sell, give away, or inherit a gun, your license information should be recorded.
10.) If you accidentally discharge your gun, commit a crime, get referred by a mental health professional, are served a restraining order, etc., you should lose your license and guns until reinstated by a serious relicensing process.
Most of you know that a license is no big deal. Besides a drivers license you need a license to fish, rent scuba equipment, operate a boat, or many other activities. I realize these differ by state, but that is not a reason to let anyone without a bit of sense pack a semiautomatic weapon in public, on the roads, and in schools. I think we need to make it much harder for some people to have guns.
Arkansas Granny
(31,519 posts)With rights come responsibilities. As you point out, a license is required to fish, drive, hunt, etc. I don't see why a license to own a gun should be considered to be more onerous than these.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)it's often pointed out that there is no specific Constitutional right to fish, hunt, or drive, so licensing is doomed.
And, as a practical matter, with hundreds of millions of guns out there already, how do you even start licensing them?
Arkansas Granny
(31,519 posts)The same goes if you try to buy ammunition. If a person is found to be in possession of a firearm without a license, they would be fined. It wouldn't get them all, but it's a start.
Sancho
(9,070 posts)If you want to buy a bullet, go hunting or to a shooting range, carry a gun, or sell a gun the PERSON needs a license.
I'm NOT suggesting background checks at every gun shop - only a license. The gateway to possession of a gun is a simple license with appropriate clearance that you are safe.
If you try to buy a gun or bullet, show a license. If you don't have one then you forfeit your gun (just like a DUI) until a judge let's you go!!!
That way, it would only take a short while before guns and criminals were obviously standing out.
You could hide the millions of guns, but the incentive would be for normal, lawful folks to get a license. No one else would be able to buy, sell, get ammo, visit a place to shoot, carry, or conceal without a license. They would show up pretty quickly.
Mainly, the complete criminals and disturbed people and children would find it MUCH harder to get their hands on guns.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)which the gunsters say is the wrong thing.
Sancho
(9,070 posts)A license is common in our system for many, many activities. Why not one that protects the public?
This has nothing to do with the 2nd amendment and does not restrict any particular type of weapon. I'm just suggesting that people have to have a typical set of requirements in order to possess a gun.
I can't think of any easier way to do it. If someone has a better way, I'd like to hear it.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)Maybe even make it illegal to sell a gun unless through a licensed gun dealer which would make records more likely.
Any "Mental Giant" knows you can't stop the criminals from wanting to obtain guns, you have to stop the easy access through private sales and no background checks.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)That seems like a voice for anarchy which could just create a civil arms race.
Folks taking what they want or protecting what they have, dependent only on available personal force, would generate a society that would likely be pretty ugly pretty fast.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)Skittles
(153,169 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)malaise
(269,056 posts)three by the time she was 20. No surprise since her father appears to have had more baggage than a Fed Ex warehouse.
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)And then she had me at 36 and my little sister at 38.
Not sure I understand your point.
Paladin
(28,264 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)because of birth control?
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)doesn't mean people have to approve of her decision. What she does with her reproductive system is none of anyone's business.
Skittles
(153,169 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)the accused killer is HER father who killed her and his 6 grandchildren, Just as troubling is that he served three years in 2001 for "accidentally" killing his 8-year-old son in a "hunting accident." Further, he had been charged with depriving a child of food and child abuse earlier.
Sounds like JUST the kind of person who needs a gun.
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)Not judging, just saying it's awful the kids were around him, whatever the reason for it was. Poverty? Incest? Cycle of abuse?
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)if she kicked him out . . .
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)There are truly no words.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)It's just a real possibility having had experience with that kind of person.
Skittles
(153,169 posts)as far as gun humping cowards go, they are a dime a dozen in America, where the NRA wetdream is everyone armed and paranoid
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)this is the first I've heard that. Woah!
malaise
(269,056 posts)I doubt that part.
Arkansas Granny
(31,519 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)Hell, one of his priors was possessing a weapon when he wasn't allowed to.
malaise
(269,056 posts)on all the occasions they were called to the house?
He shot seven more people before killing himself.
Response to malaise (Reply #18)
Recursion This message was self-deleted by its author.
malaise
(269,056 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)Yes, everyone does agree that we need greater enforcement of existing laws, particularly proponents of greater gun control. In fact, that response of mine was entirely stupid, and I apologize.
malaise
(269,056 posts)I'm not the sensitive type
Catherine Vincent
(34,490 posts)Those poor babies.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)FFS "... accidentally shooting and killing his 8-year-old son ..." "... depriving a child of food and shelter, battery ..."
malaise
(269,056 posts)cyberswede
(26,117 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)malaise
(269,056 posts)This fugger was depriving a child of food - they remove children from homes like that one for less reasons.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)strawberries
(498 posts)but I just saw a picture of the guy who basically killed his whole family.
They all look the same
1. they wear the same type uniform, almost military looking
2. well armed
3. white
4. can survive in the wilderness
You can flame me, but show me differently
strawberries
(498 posts)I was looking at the guy who killed the state cops.
My goodness they are all starting to blend in my mind
freshwest
(53,661 posts)heaven05
(18,124 posts)greytdemocrat
(3,299 posts)Should have been removed from the gene pool a long time ago.
Ineeda
(3,626 posts)if there was a holy-roller aspect here, or just general nutsville. That area is widely fundamentalist, and they might have adhered to the Quiverful philosophy, given the number of kids. Just speculating, of course. Very sad, in any case.
Not really relevant, but does anyone else think that 2001 mugshot at the link bears a remarkable resemblance to Jeb Bush?
Creepy.
malaise
(269,056 posts)that the area is full of 'cross burners' as in KKK. Don't know much else.
Baitball Blogger
(46,736 posts)heaven05
(18,124 posts)malaise
(269,056 posts)I can't believe this madness.
DesertDiamond
(1,616 posts)terrifying and sad for them too. At this moment I can only say that I hope they go on to have better fortune and happier family lives in their next lifetime. I am so going to chant for this!
KG
(28,751 posts)where's my fainting couch?
surrealAmerican
(11,362 posts)... or any of the guns he had, needs to be going to jail for a good long time. I wonder if that can be determined.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)registration. Even if they identify who made the transfer, they'll likely say how were they to know the Yahoo shouldn't have guns.
ohnoyoudidnt
(1,858 posts)951-Riverside
(7,234 posts)to shoot 6 people (killing 3) 24 years later.
?ve=1&tl=1
http://www.boston.com/news/specials/02_15_Amy_Bishop/
Most shootings are not accidents.
Matrosov
(1,098 posts)A great example of the failure of gun control. As a convicted felon, he was ineligible to purchase a gun, yet he got his hands on one anyway. That's because gun-free zones and laws against felons purchasing weapons and so forth are not going to stop criminals who want to gun someone down.
The one thing about which the NRA is correct is that gun regulation does not stop criminals. However, their idea that the way to stop gun violence is with more gun violence is as nonsensical as telling a lung cancer patient to smoke more in the hopes of his cancer developing a tumor of its own and dying.
On the other hand, he could've never shot anyone if there weren't any guns to buy in the first place. Getting guns out of our society is the answer.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)Last edited Sat Sep 20, 2014, 09:55 AM - Edit history (1)
I kept wondering throughout the day if they had any words of wisdom for the family's classmates . . . like, "don't worry, the adults are going to make sure this doesn't happen again . . . you are safe"
or if they told the truth
malaise
(269,056 posts)in schools than teachers.