General Discussion

grasswire

(50,130 posts) Tue Sep 23, 2014, 01:42 AM Sep 2014

If the breach of the WH were written in a TV script...

...it probably would be done as a warning to the POTUS to stay in line, to obey the elite shadow government PTB.

And who's to say that's not the real case here? A breach of security four minutes after the POTUS and family leave the WH?

Who's to say that's not a warning? As in "we can allow a breach any time".

I take this breach very seriously.

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If the breach of the WH were written in a TV script... (Original Post) grasswire Sep 2014 OP

Sometimes a loon is just a loon. nt LeftyMom Sep 2014 #1

you mean like thee OK City bomber? grasswire Sep 2014 #2

They're trying to kill him. nt Hekate Sep 2014 #3

I agree. This shit was intentional underthematrix Sep 2014 #4

Why would you take this more seriously than Egnever Sep 2014 #5

because of the rumblings lately.. grasswire Sep 2014 #6

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)

1. Sometimes a loon is just a loon. nt

Reply to grasswire (Original post)

Tue Sep 23, 2014, 02:12 AM

Sep 2014

grasswire

(50,130 posts)

2. you mean like thee OK City bomber?

Reply to LeftyMom (Reply #1)

Tue Sep 23, 2014, 02:20 AM

Sep 2014

Hekate

(90,714 posts)

3. They're trying to kill him. nt

Reply to grasswire (Original post)

Tue Sep 23, 2014, 02:58 AM

Sep 2014

underthematrix

(5,811 posts)

4. I agree. This shit was intentional

Reply to Hekate (Reply #3)

Tue Sep 23, 2014, 03:56 AM

Sep 2014

Egnever

(21,506 posts)

5. Why would you take this more seriously than

Reply to grasswire (Original post)

Tue Sep 23, 2014, 04:27 AM

Sep 2014

Any of the other times it has happened and there have been many.

Just curious.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)

6. because of the rumblings lately..

Reply to Egnever (Reply #5)

Tue Sep 23, 2014, 12:25 PM

Sep 2014

...about the military not informing him fully, or contradicting him, or whatever it is they've been doing that hints there are rogue elements around him.

Reply to this discussion