General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEveryone remember when they said deposing Saddam was gonna work out Just Great?
Democracy! Nation Building!
And the dirty hippies who said it all seemed a bit optimistic were just a bunch of nay-saying cheese eating surrender monkeys.
Well, here we are -- Iraq in chaos, bombing in Syria, and arming rebels. I, myself, am counting the days until I'm once again asked Why Do I Hate America?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)this is not unilateral.
malthaussen
(17,202 posts)Not that I thought there was any point to regime change, but back in the first Iraqi war, I said that unless we ended up hanging Saddam from a lamppost, we had wasted our time. I figured some other sub-moronic strong man would take his place. Allah knows there are a sufficiency of those in the region.
-- Mal
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)The war pigs are now floating "More civilians will die from our inaction than from our air strikes!"
Funny how that talking point showed up en masse.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)were saying that we would be greeted as liberators.
I'm sure that now we have a Nobel Peace Prize laureate working this thing, that it's all going to turn out completely different.
randome
(34,845 posts)'They' who said that about Saddam were incompetent liars. I don't judge the current administration by what came before. And you shouldn't, either.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]TECT in the name of the Representative approves of this post.[/center][/font][hr]
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)JEB
(4,748 posts)bloody mess of welfare for the MIC is going to pay for itself since the middle class is largely bust and so many working class jobs are overseas. Of course it would be unpatriotic to ask the rich to cough up any dough.
Make7
(8,543 posts)The question is: are the people who is it working out for influential enough to prolong it, or are the people it is harming going to be able to stop it?