Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 08:39 PM Oct 2014

Anonymous donor has provided a home to the Ebola relatives in a gated community.

Good for the donor.

But why the city couldn't have used its own funds to rent property for these people, instead of trapping them in the contaminated apartment for almost a week, still isn't clear to me.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/10/03/family-relocated-from-apartment-where-ebola-patient-stayed/16677643/

Friday afternoon, however, the city confirmed the family has been relocated from the apartment and moved into a private residence in Dallas County.

A city official told ABC News the home is in a gated community and was donated by a person who wants to remain anonymous. City officials had a hard time finding anyone willing to let the family stay in their home because of health concerns.

SNIP

Prior to the scheduled cleanup, county officials said soiled bedding and other contaminated items were placed in plastic bags and remained inside the apartment with quarantined family members.

When cleaning crews entered the apartment, they learned Duncan had slept on every mattress in the apartment during his time there, raising further questions about just how much the family was exposed to the Ebola virus in his time there and why it took so long to get a cleaning crew into the residence.

40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Anonymous donor has provided a home to the Ebola relatives in a gated community. (Original Post) pnwmom Oct 2014 OP
Good and I have a difficult time being polite in expressing my anger at it taking so long uppityperson Oct 2014 #1
I missed that particular factoid. Geez. What a disaster this has been. pnwmom Oct 2014 #2
OMG he did not do that!?!?!?!!? WHY??? kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #4
Sick people don't always think clearly. nt. Mariana Oct 2014 #23
True. But everybody in that apartment had to be thinking EBOLAEBOLAEBOLA kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #28
How do you know they didn't pour bleach or lysol? How do you know what everyone was uppityperson Oct 2014 #29
I don't care if they're in the presidential suite at the freaking Hilton. All I care is that they kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #3
Indeed, making them stay in a contaminated apartment for days exposed and endangered them a lot. uppityperson Oct 2014 #5
We should care. By keeping them in the contaminated apartment for days, pnwmom Oct 2014 #6
I understand doing it the first day, until alternate arrangements could be made. But beyond that kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #10
I believe that was the problem..... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #30
It feels more like the response of overwhelmed health professionals Generic Other Oct 2014 #37
Thank you. I just get tired of the misinformation, the pooh-poohers, and kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #39
CNN interview with the female relative cwydro Oct 2014 #7
And I think she helped bag up his stuff. So she's certainly at risk. pnwmom Oct 2014 #8
If she knows she was exposed, why has she not come forward to speak to the hordes of CDC personnel kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #15
CDC should have been contacting her. LisaL Oct 2014 #18
She has been talking to them and they are following her. She's somewhere on the list. pnwmom Oct 2014 #31
Isn't the rule watch for symptoms. They are not contagious until symptoms. seabeyond Oct 2014 #33
Yes, but she was exposed as much as some of the people in the other apartment. pnwmom Oct 2014 #34
Why did it have to come to this? ohnoyoudidnt Oct 2014 #9
Good question BrotherIvan Oct 2014 #11
Because they are asymptomatic and, hence, cannot transmit Ebola. n/t ColesCountyDem Oct 2014 #13
But almost anywhere would have been better for them than being trapped in the pnwmom Oct 2014 #32
I can't argue with that. ColesCountyDem Oct 2014 #35
We don't take up hospital beds with asymptomatic people who may very well never get ill. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #14
But perhaps an exception for a disease they are tying to contain might be an exception BrotherIvan Oct 2014 #16
it's not penny pinching. hospitals are not hotels. magical thyme Oct 2014 #40
Repeated breaking of isolation protocols? I heard that they sent a child to school. Were there other jwirr Oct 2014 #17
The reports I saw used the word "violations" without specifying what they were. pnwmom Oct 2014 #22
Sending a child to school who had contact with an ebola patient kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #24
It's the local public health's responsibility. They are the miserable failures in this. CDC is there kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #12
I read somewhere that the CDC hired "The Good Guys." pnwmom Oct 2014 #20
I suspect they did it because the locals didn't think to or said it wasn't necessary. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #25
Same problem FEMA had after Sandy- everyone kept expecting FEMA to do everything KittyWampus Oct 2014 #21
Yep. CDC is not your mother. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #27
Except you are in earthquake country Generic Other Oct 2014 #38
They'll spend as much money as they can telling you how prepared they are valerief Oct 2014 #19
Yay for people who care flamingdem Oct 2014 #26
I like the Dallas County judge Gothmog Oct 2014 #36

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
1. Good and I have a difficult time being polite in expressing my anger at it taking so long
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 08:43 PM
Oct 2014
When cleaning crews entered the apartment, they learned Duncan had slept on every mattress in the apartment during his time there, raising further questions about just how much the family was exposed to the Ebola virus in his time there and why it took so long to get a cleaning crew into the residence.
 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
28. True. But everybody in that apartment had to be thinking EBOLAEBOLAEBOLA
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 12:08 AM
Oct 2014

and just stood by and let him vomit for days??? And didn't think to pour bleach or lysol on everything?

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
29. How do you know they didn't pour bleach or lysol? How do you know what everyone was
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 12:10 AM
Oct 2014

thinking? Seriously. There is not a lot of information but a lot of speculation and assumptions.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
3. I don't care if they're in the presidential suite at the freaking Hilton. All I care is that they
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 08:51 PM
Oct 2014

STAY PUT AND OBEY THE ISOLATION RULES.

It's wonderful that someone has done this for them. I doubt they will feel so charitable if they wind up with ebola and the house needs hazmat work.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
6. We should care. By keeping them in the contaminated apartment for days,
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 08:58 PM
Oct 2014

an apartment in which the patient had slept on every bed, the state increased the chances that one or more of these people was exposed to enough virus to infect them, too.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
10. I understand doing it the first day, until alternate arrangements could be made. But beyond that
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 09:19 PM
Oct 2014

it just opens them up for a wrongful death lawsuit IMHO if those folks do come down with ebola very late in the isolation period. And most certainly if they do so after Oct 19.

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
37. It feels more like the response of overwhelmed health professionals
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 11:34 AM
Oct 2014

in the midst of a pandemic than the first case! That is alarming. A good wake-up call for all.

In the middle ages, the cry "Bring out your dead," ironically will not be an option in the modern age, especially if infrastructure/bureaucracy are overwhelmed. The CDC and WHO are our best defense at this point.

I can't see how we can avoid more cases since we are sending 1400 soldiers to the area. And 13K+ plus people have US visas in the infected countries. It will certainly require professionalism, nerves of steel and maybe the world working together to end this scourge in Africa and to prevent its spread. We better hope its our lucky day.

I really appreciate your keeping us informed on the dangers Kestrel. It's hard for me to entirely trust the for-profit system being able to respond to a public emergency. I prefer to face danger with as much information as possible.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
39. Thank you. I just get tired of the misinformation, the pooh-poohers, and
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 01:49 PM
Oct 2014

the frantically irrational panickers.

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
7. CNN interview with the female relative
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 09:01 PM
Oct 2014

who called the ambulance for him...who was with him prior to pick up.

She is not under quarantine, and she doesn't know what to do.

Major fuck up on so many levels.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
8. And I think she helped bag up his stuff. So she's certainly at risk.
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 09:03 PM
Oct 2014

I can't believe how sloppily all of this is being handled. What a disgrace.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
15. If she knows she was exposed, why has she not come forward to speak to the hordes of CDC personnel
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 09:26 PM
Oct 2014

and state/local public health investigators to get on the contact list????? They are swarming that place.

LisaL

(44,973 posts)
18. CDC should have been contacting her.
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 10:30 PM
Oct 2014

They are the ones that are supposed to do tracing of his contacts.
Apparently that was not done well, since she clearly is his contact, but was not quarantined.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
31. She has been talking to them and they are following her. She's somewhere on the list.
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 12:26 AM
Oct 2014

She's living a few blocks away in her own separate apartment, with her children. She says that the children have been told that they can't go to school, and she can't go to her job, but nobody has told them they have to stay indoors. She says she is voluntarily confining them all indoors herself. But she's worried about running out of food and how she's going to pay her rent without a paycheck.

She was closely involved with the uncle's care, so it seems odd to me that the CDC isn't treating her exposure as seriously as the people who were living in the apartment.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
33. Isn't the rule watch for symptoms. They are not contagious until symptoms.
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 01:43 AM
Oct 2014

So it is a watch and wait. Correct?

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
34. Yes, but she was exposed as much as some of the people in the other apartment.
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 02:25 AM
Oct 2014

So the question is why they are treating the two groups of relatives differently -- one with a guard at the door, and the other not even told they need to remain indoors.

ohnoyoudidnt

(1,858 posts)
9. Why did it have to come to this?
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 09:05 PM
Oct 2014

Even if the city wouldn't do it, why didn't the CDC take appropriate action?

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
32. But almost anywhere would have been better for them than being trapped in the
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 12:27 AM
Oct 2014

contaminated apartment, an apartment where, for some reason, the Ebola patient had slept in every bed.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
14. We don't take up hospital beds with asymptomatic people who may very well never get ill.
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 09:25 PM
Oct 2014

But their deliberate and repeated breaking of isolation protocols early on does mean they need to be FORCIBLY kept in one place. Any hotel room would suffice. The instant anybody gets a fever, and before they start in with the puking and projectile bloody diarrhea, you whisk them to the hospital for actual treatment.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
16. But perhaps an exception for a disease they are tying to contain might be an exception
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 09:33 PM
Oct 2014

Less than the cost of one bomb. I don't know, but it seems like they are setting up all of these people to get infected by locking them all together in a place where the virus was active. Seems like a stupid time to pinch pennies, really. I would hope the same for small pox or tuberculosis or whatever. I wouldn't criticize them for erring on the side of caution.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
40. it's not penny pinching. hospitals are not hotels.
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 04:03 PM
Oct 2014

Hospitals are places that are rampant with disease. They do the best they can to keep from spreading germs, but face it, the germs are ubiquitous. You don't stay in hospital unless you absolutely must, unless you are a glutton for punishment.

They also are not hotels or motels. The people involved are far more comfortable and safe confined to a home with food and supplies brought to them than confined to a hospital room with hospital food.

Furthermore, I had read they were arranging for some kind of tutoring for the children. Possibly something online.

The house donors were friends of the family and willing to do so.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
17. Repeated breaking of isolation protocols? I heard that they sent a child to school. Were there other
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 10:21 PM
Oct 2014

problems?

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
22. The reports I saw used the word "violations" without specifying what they were.
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 11:28 PM
Oct 2014

But all of the children did go to school on Monday and Tuesday, and they probably weren't supposed to. On Wednesday only one of the kids did -- so somehow he didn't get the message.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
24. Sending a child to school who had contact with an ebola patient
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 11:58 PM
Oct 2014

is terrifying enough. And cause enough to bring on the armed guard.

(quintuple facepalm)

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
12. It's the local public health's responsibility. They are the miserable failures in this. CDC is there
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 09:22 PM
Oct 2014

to provide guidance, advice, clarification of policies, a little extra manpower in the contact tracing.

CDC folks don't come clean apartments.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
20. I read somewhere that the CDC hired "The Good Guys."
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 10:44 PM
Oct 2014

So they don't clean apartments, but they hire the people who do.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
21. Same problem FEMA had after Sandy- everyone kept expecting FEMA to do everything
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 10:49 PM
Oct 2014

But the fact is FEMA coordinates. It doesn't do the day to day legwork.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
27. Yep. CDC is not your mother.
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 12:02 AM
Oct 2014

Here in Los Angeles we have very proactive public health professionals. So I'm used to it and expect it.

There is simply no excuse for a big city like Dallas to NOT have the same level of competence in public health. Unless you take into account the fact that they do not want government services and refuse to pay for them.

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
38. Except you are in earthquake country
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 11:38 AM
Oct 2014

they are just in Bush country. You actually have training in LA. Dallas says every poor person on their own.

valerief

(53,235 posts)
19. They'll spend as much money as they can telling you how prepared they are
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 10:38 PM
Oct 2014

and how they've done this before and how they're on top of it. But actually doing it? They won't spend shit and they'll fuck it up endlessly.

Texan healthcare.

Gothmog

(145,288 posts)
36. I like the Dallas County judge
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 09:16 AM
Oct 2014

He is doing his best here. The man meet in person with the family and found them a place to stay

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Anonymous donor has provi...