Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

boomer55

(592 posts)
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 05:48 AM Oct 2014

Up to 42 day incubation period for Ebola not 21

The 42-day period is twice the generally accepted maximum incubation period of the virus. However, some incubation periods are longer - that WHO said that in 95 percent of cases the incubation period was between one and 21 days. In 98 percent it was no longer than 42 days.

http://uk.mobile.reuters.com/article/idUKKCN0I328W20141014?irpc=932

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Up to 42 day incubation period for Ebola not 21 (Original Post) boomer55 Oct 2014 OP
Damn Lars39 Oct 2014 #1
That's correct, and here is a direct link to WHO referencing that Yo_Mama Oct 2014 #2
so they should quarantine all those people for 42 days down in tx... boomer55 Oct 2014 #3
The second HCW is a low risk, but a transmission risk Yo_Mama Oct 2014 #4

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
2. That's correct, and here is a direct link to WHO referencing that
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 08:05 AM
Oct 2014
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/ebola/14-october-2014/en/

But the thought is that the longer "incubation" periods actually reflect missed transmissions.

I am not claiming that's true. Just passing it on. On a more hopeful note, WHO does believe that they will shortly be able to declare Nigeria and Senegal Ebola-free.
 

boomer55

(592 posts)
3. so they should quarantine all those people for 42 days down in tx...
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 02:39 PM
Oct 2014

although its probably too late now that the nurse flew on the airplane.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
4. The second HCW is a low risk, but a transmission risk
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 04:48 PM
Oct 2014

So now things have gotten abruptly far more difficult.

Plane travel involves pressure changes that would be more likely to bring virus out of hiding. Still low risk, but definitely there's risk.

So there's another potential 5-700 exposures now. Maybe 1/2 of one percent risk to 30 to 40 people, which translates to about a 1.5% chance of transmission. That's at least in the ballpark. In practice it probably will be zero transmission, but shit. Without knowing the contagion route, you can't figure the real risk. The problem is that it's too many people to track.

We have no plan for this, btw. This was what wasn't supposed to happen, but unless you put all the HCW on notice beforehand, sooner or later it was GOING to happen.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Up to 42 day incubation p...