Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 07:03 PM Oct 2014

Dallas Official: Ebola Hospital Never Warned About Travel

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/ebola-virus-outbreak/dallas-official-ebola-hospital-never-warned-about-travel-n226796

Dallas County Judge Clay Jenkins criticized the CDC hours after it was revealed that a second nurse who came into contact with Ebola patient Thomas Eric Duncan at Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital has tested positive for the deadly disease, and that the new patient flew on a commercial flight to Ohio before she was diagnosed.

Jenkins, the chief executive in Dallas County, said he is seeking an order to bar 75 hospital workers who may have come into contact with Duncan, who died of the disease last Wednesday, from taking mass transit. Early Wednesday nurse Amber Joy Vinson tested positive for Ebola, becoming the second nurse who treated Duncan to be diagnosed with the disease that has killed more than 4,000 people in the West African countries of Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea.

“I’m not happy about the lack of direction on travel restrictions. If restrictions aren’t put in place immediately we’ll put them in place on a local level,” Jenkins told NBC News. “We can’t have people out on public conveyances, on airplanes.” Jenkins was careful to say that the government doesn’t believe the order will need to be enforced, calling those who treated Duncan “heroic health care professionals” who just need some guidance on travel.

CDC Director Dr. Thomas Frieden said Wednesday that Vinson should not have boarded a commercial jet after she was exposed to Ebola and developed a mild fever, but those instructions were apparently never communicated to the hospital staff who came into contact with Duncan. The other nurse, Nina Pham, 26, tested positive for Ebola on Sunday. She is being treated at Texas Health Presbyterian and was in good condition Wednesday, the hospital said.


71 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dallas Official: Ebola Hospital Never Warned About Travel (Original Post) KamaAina Oct 2014 OP
Great idea, lets make sure all ebola patients are forced to say in areas where healthcare randys1 Oct 2014 #1
There is a difference between hopping into a plane to visit someone across the country and being jwirr Oct 2014 #6
I am having some issues with people saying they have not been warned about travel Peacetrain Oct 2014 #2
its common sense your self monitoring don't fly! MattP Oct 2014 #4
yeah, me too. notadmblnd Oct 2014 #11
unnnn, not everyone is tethered to the same news channels uponit7771 Oct 2014 #32
Do these administrators want to have some else do all their thinking. It came to them via travel jwirr Oct 2014 #3
It certainly makes one wonder how they got and keep their jobs notadmblnd Oct 2014 #13
Unless I missed a step - she shouldn't have been anywhere in public underpants Oct 2014 #5
And so it begins. Circular firing squad. n/t 7wo7rees Oct 2014 #7
Doesn't give me much confidence that this nurse either didn't have common sense... joeybee12 Oct 2014 #8
The stovetop range is hot. Earth_First Oct 2014 #9
What I am referring to is the ludicrous Idea that we NOT allow anyone who might be sick with ebola randys1 Oct 2014 #10
Time for true mandatory quarantine. N/t roamer65 Oct 2014 #12
Agreed. Duncan's family didn't follow common sense now they have a mandatory quarantine Mike Daniels Oct 2014 #70
The CDC also hasn't communicated that it's a bad idea to stab yourself in the eye with a fork... SidDithers Oct 2014 #14
DUzy! KamaAina Oct 2014 #15
But CDC thought it was fine for this woman to fly with a fever. LisaL Oct 2014 #18
She had a 99 degree fever and hopped on a plane. dixiegrrrrl Oct 2014 #22
CDC said it was fine for her to do it. LisaL Oct 2014 #28
The CDC cleared her for travel after she called them multiple times uponit7771 Oct 2014 #33
But the CDC would tell you if you called that stabbing yourself in the eye with a fork.. Fumesucker Oct 2014 #42
We live in the United States of STUPID!! YOHABLO Oct 2014 #16
So everyone who cares for an Ebola patient riverwalker Oct 2014 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Oct 2014 #19
She reportedly called CDC, and they told her it was fine for her to board with a fever. LisaL Oct 2014 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Oct 2014 #21
Better believe it. LisaL Oct 2014 #24
I agree, I don't believe them at all, either, liberalhistorian Oct 2014 #25
Do you believe CDC? LisaL Oct 2014 #26
WOW. I do NOT liberalhistorian Oct 2014 #34
Welcome to the "CDC is incompetent freak out group"... riderinthestorm Oct 2014 #40
The person she spoke with gave the advice based *entirely* on a chart tblue37 Oct 2014 #65
Crazy to have a specific fever temp. cwydro Oct 2014 #69
they were probably too busy coming up with their newest apology or mass-calming reassuring quote Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #43
CDC has confirmed gave green light for her to fly (link) ctaylors6 Oct 2014 #30
Wow, another win for the CDC. The same home of the "experts" who tell us that restricting visa Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #41
Jesus H. Christ liberalhistorian Oct 2014 #23
Remember, up until Pham's diagnosis, the workers weren't even considered to be ecstatic Oct 2014 #48
do they not educate themselves? Skittles Oct 2014 #27
Her tripped was approved by CDC. LisaL Oct 2014 #29
I would not have even asked for permission -I would not go Skittles Oct 2014 #31
Apparently nurses do. And they get very offended if you point out that this might just smack of kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #36
Turns out she was being more cautious than the CDC - incredible! goldent Oct 2014 #38
If they failed to cram written advice down their freaking throats while screaming it in their ears, kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #35
Turns out the CDC might be the stupid one goldent Oct 2014 #39
She didn't meet the criteria for a body temperature of concern. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #44
You sure changed your tune quickly Fumesucker Oct 2014 #45
The CDC director is the one doing Monday morning quarterbacking goldent Oct 2014 #46
Do you need to seek treatment for whiplash? Yo_Mama Oct 2014 #49
Yeah laundry_queen Oct 2014 #50
She was likely in denial.... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #54
Probably laundry_queen Oct 2014 #55
Even Dr Nancy violated her own voluntary quarantine.... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #56
I know laundry_queen Oct 2014 #58
Dr. Nancy doesn't have Ebola. LisaL Oct 2014 #62
yet VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #64
These kind of people are why we have warnings on Windex bottles... LostInAnomie Oct 2014 #37
How is it possible for the CDC to be this stupid? Yo_Mama Oct 2014 #47
It sucks how many people want to kick down and kiss up Fumesucker Oct 2014 #51
I'm just not buying it. LostInAnomie Oct 2014 #53
They were never told not to travel by CDC. They had no restrictions on movement whatsoever. Yo_Mama Oct 2014 #57
I don't know. LisaL Oct 2014 #59
There are reasons why they might have wanted her to return to Dallas Yo_Mama Oct 2014 #66
Not any sort of expert here, but why aren't those who've had direct exposure to calimary Oct 2014 #52
Because it is unecessary. If someone is infected, the viral load builds over a long period of time. morningfog Oct 2014 #60
Not according to CDC director, who claimed these people should not be flying. LisaL Oct 2014 #61
He is now, sure. This is an optics change. He got reamed in the media. morningfog Oct 2014 #63
Optics count. Impressions count. Sometimes even more than facts. bklyncowgirl Oct 2014 #68
As I mentioned in an earlier post, the CDC person who approved her flying tblue37 Oct 2014 #67
Sounds like a training problem at the CDC Fumesucker Oct 2014 #71

randys1

(16,286 posts)
1. Great idea, lets make sure all ebola patients are forced to say in areas where healthcare
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 07:04 PM
Oct 2014

is lacking so they can spread the disease even more

fucking morons

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
6. There is a difference between hopping into a plane to visit someone across the country and being
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 07:11 PM
Oct 2014

taken to a special hospital such as Emory in an emergency vehicle.

Peacetrain

(22,876 posts)
2. I am having some issues with people saying they have not been warned about travel
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 07:04 PM
Oct 2014

That is all we have been talking about for the last couple of weeks..low grade temps.. flights into the United States..

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
3. Do these administrators want to have some else do all their thinking. It came to them via travel
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 07:08 PM
Oct 2014

in the first place and they do not understand that keeping those who came into contact with Duncan should not be traveling all around the country? I am sorry but they appear to he out of touch with the rest of the world. I don't think they listen to the news.

underpants

(182,803 posts)
5. Unless I missed a step - she shouldn't have been anywhere in public
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 07:10 PM
Oct 2014

and she should have known that. If I was ID'ed as a possible I would be holed up and make plans for my family. Just saying.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
8. Doesn't give me much confidence that this nurse either didn't have common sense...
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 07:12 PM
Oct 2014

Or had been living in a vacuum these past several weeks and therefore thought nothing of flying...good for this judge to do what these healthcare "professionals" should have the sense to do without being told.

Earth_First

(14,910 posts)
9. The stovetop range is hot.
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 07:12 PM
Oct 2014

Toaster oven + bathtub = no.

Roses = ouch.

Just a general reminder for those at Presbyterian.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
10. What I am referring to is the ludicrous Idea that we NOT allow anyone who might be sick with ebola
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 07:15 PM
Oct 2014

to LEAVE areas where they can get NO healthcare but ONLY spread the disease more.

This would not apply to here in the US but I heard some rightwing dipshit congressman from TexASS say we cant allow anyone from anywhere to fly in here for a while, at least not anybody from those BLACK countries.

roamer65

(36,745 posts)
12. Time for true mandatory quarantine. N/t
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 07:20 PM
Oct 2014

Also time for harsh penalties if you break it. Infected persons endanger the lives of close family and many others when they disregard common sense infectious disease guidelines.

Mike Daniels

(5,842 posts)
70. Agreed. Duncan's family didn't follow common sense now they have a mandatory quarantine
Thu Oct 16, 2014, 08:49 AM
Oct 2014

If people are going to willingly put the larger population as risk because they can't be inconvenienced to self-quarantine themselves then more draconian measures may be needed.

Of course it didn't help that NBC's medical expert decided that she could ignore a quarantine order just so she could get high-end take-out.

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
14. The CDC also hasn't communicated that it's a bad idea to stab yourself in the eye with a fork...
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 07:24 PM
Oct 2014

But I'd guess that most people, and certainly all health-care professionals, might be able to figure that one out on their own.

Does a nurse really need to be told "Don't travel if you've recently treated someone who died of Ebola, one of your colleagues has been diagnosed with Ebola, and you maybe aren't feeling that well "?



Sid

LisaL

(44,973 posts)
18. But CDC thought it was fine for this woman to fly with a fever.
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 07:34 PM
Oct 2014

She reportedly called CDC and asked them.
And they said it's not problem, fly away.

"CBS News Medical Correspondent Dr. John LaPook reports that Vinson called the CDC several times before boarding the plane concerned about her fever and was told she was OK to board."

http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2014/10/15/ebola-patient-traveled-day-before-diagnosis/

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
22. She had a 99 degree fever and hopped on a plane.
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 07:53 PM
Oct 2014

Maybe the very first sign of Ebola is a desire to go for a plane ride?

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
42. But the CDC would tell you if you called that stabbing yourself in the eye with a fork..
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 08:42 PM
Oct 2014

Is a bad idea.

riverwalker

(8,694 posts)
17. So everyone who cares for an Ebola patient
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 07:33 PM
Oct 2014

can't travel for 21 days after caring for the patient?

sign me up

Response to KamaAina (Original post)

Response to LisaL (Reply #20)

LisaL

(44,973 posts)
24. Better believe it.
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 07:56 PM
Oct 2014

It's being reported in msm. CDC confirmed it. They allowed her to go on the trip. Later on the article it says they allowed her to go back despite her fever.

"But the CDC has now confirmed that it gave Amber Vinson permission to make a trip to Cleveland."

http://www.wfaa.com/story/news/health/2014/10/15/second-dallas-hospital-worker-diagnosed-ebola/17290677/

liberalhistorian

(20,818 posts)
25. I agree, I don't believe them at all, either,
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 07:58 PM
Oct 2014

I don't believe the CDC told her it was okay to fly. I don't believe she even called them; and I don't believe that, if she DID call them, that they gave her the green light. I think the nurse and the hospital are covering their asses here, trying to make the CDC the scapegoat in what was an EPIC fail on the part of the nurse and the hospital.

LisaL

(44,973 posts)
26. Do you believe CDC?
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 08:00 PM
Oct 2014

They confirmed both things.
They allowed her to go on the trip and allowed her to fly with a fever.

"It was later confirmed that the CDC gave Vinson permission to get on the plane because she was showing no other symptoms of the virus, and her temperature didn't reach the threshold of 100.4 degrees."

http://www.wfaa.com/story/news/health/2014/10/15/second-dallas-hospital-worker-diagnosed-ebola/17290677/

liberalhistorian

(20,818 posts)
34. WOW. I do NOT
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 08:14 PM
Oct 2014

understand where they were coming from, then, that makes no sense. I would think that they'd have known the lengthy incubation period and would have refused all travel, if not have them in quarantine. Jesus, that's frightening.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
40. Welcome to the "CDC is incompetent freak out group"...
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 08:38 PM
Oct 2014

Now you understand those of us with our hair on fire about the CDCs incompetence.



Welcome to the club...

tblue37

(65,357 posts)
65. The person she spoke with gave the advice based *entirely* on a chart
Thu Oct 16, 2014, 07:53 AM
Oct 2014

that specified a 100.4 degree fever as the level to be concerned about. But elsewhere on the CDC site it says those who have been exposed should not travel. I think the person at the CDC giving her advice confused general guidelines for people merely *coming from a part of the world with Ebola cases* with the guidelines for those *with known exposure* from being in contact with a *symptomatic* Ebola victim, which she and the other health care workers had been.

Obviously someone reading from a chart to offer advice is not someone with any actuall expertise in the matter. The CDC needs to staff a dedicated Ebola hotline with someone who actually *knows* something about the virus and how it spreads.

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
69. Crazy to have a specific fever temp.
Thu Oct 16, 2014, 08:44 AM
Oct 2014

My regular body temp is ALWAYS 97.6, so 99.5 would be a pretty good spike for me.

I would think ANY fever in a person who has been exposed would be cause for concern.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
43. they were probably too busy coming up with their newest apology or mass-calming reassuring quote
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 08:43 PM
Oct 2014

to actually think this thing through.

Oops.

ctaylors6

(693 posts)
30. CDC has confirmed gave green light for her to fly (link)
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 08:03 PM
Oct 2014

Link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com

It's being widely reported in Dallas and being picked up nationally

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
41. Wow, another win for the CDC. The same home of the "experts" who tell us that restricting visa
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 08:41 PM
Oct 2014

travel from 3 countries in any way, shape, or form would be an unimaginable tragedy and impossible logistical feat.

liberalhistorian

(20,818 posts)
23. Jesus H. Christ
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 07:55 PM
Oct 2014

on a cracker raft, do none of these fucking idiots have any goddamned common sense? Why in the HELL should you need to be told your travel is restricted when you've been directly exposed to a deadly, usually fatal, disease? Especially if you're a goddamned medical professional????????? Really? Seriously? Do they need to be fed by hand and tucked into bed at night, too????????????

ecstatic

(32,704 posts)
48. Remember, up until Pham's diagnosis, the workers weren't even considered to be
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 09:34 PM
Oct 2014

at risk of catching ebola, since they were supposedly following CDC protocols.

Skittles

(153,160 posts)
27. do they not educate themselves?
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 08:01 PM
Oct 2014

who waits for "management" to tell them what to do, besides teabaggers?

LisaL

(44,973 posts)
29. Her tripped was approved by CDC.
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 08:02 PM
Oct 2014

Even after she got the fever, they allowed her to get onto the plane.

Skittles

(153,160 posts)
31. I would not have even asked for permission -I would not go
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 08:05 PM
Oct 2014

it is ridiculous - makes no sense at all

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
36. Apparently nurses do. And they get very offended if you point out that this might just smack of
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 08:29 PM
Oct 2014

laziness and unprofessionalism.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
35. If they failed to cram written advice down their freaking throats while screaming it in their ears,
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 08:28 PM
Oct 2014

they showed a lack of understanding of just how stupid people can be. CDC assumes people will behave intelligently. This is a very bad assumption.

Judge Jenkins again makes a lot of sense. And at least if HE says "stay put" people will listen. The locals may very well just be deliberately ignoring everything CDC tells them. Which is something I predicted.

goldent

(1,582 posts)
39. Turns out the CDC might be the stupid one
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 08:38 PM
Oct 2014
“This nurse, Nurse Vinson, did in fact call the CDC several times before taking that flight and said she has a temperature, a fever of 99.5, and the person at the CDC looked at a chart and because her temperature wasn’t 100.4 or higher she didn’t officially fall into the category of high risk.”


Sadly there is too much blind trust in what the CDC has been saying, and appears they are seriously letting us down.
 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
44. She didn't meet the criteria for a body temperature of concern.
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 09:05 PM
Oct 2014

Can you cite the scientific data that shows that a temp of 99.5F is due to Ebola frequently enough to justify people not flying with it?

CDC uses scientific data and, you know, EVIDENCE to arrive at its guidelines. That's why epidemiologists are crack statisticians.

Monday morning quarterbacking is SOOOOO easy. And it makes not-so-smart people look smart to those who really aren't paying attention.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
45. You sure changed your tune quickly
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 09:09 PM
Oct 2014

You wanted to crucify the poor nurse for even thinking about flying just a few minutes ago.



goldent

(1,582 posts)
46. The CDC director is the one doing Monday morning quarterbacking
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 09:26 PM
Oct 2014

He now says the nurse was given incorrect advice, given the circumstances.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
49. Do you need to seek treatment for whiplash?
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 09:41 PM
Oct 2014

One moment you're claiming that the nurse is unbelievably stupid for not following CDC advice, and the next moment you're claiming that CDC gave the correct advice, except that the top guy at CDC then "oops" contradicted that advice.

There's stupidity here, but it's not the nurse's. Either the CDC's advice to the nurse was correct in the first place and Frieden's statement was wrong (and thus there was no scientific basis for the CDC deciding to contact all the passengers after the nurse tested positive), or Frieden was right and the guidance given on the website was wrong (but why is it there if it wrong?) and the nurse is unbelievably stupid, but then so is the CDC for not giving them guidance not to travel in the first place!

What's going on is that the CDC is repetitively blaming HCW when the HCW follow CDC's advice and it doesn't work out in practice. That's a problem.

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
50. Yeah
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 09:43 PM
Oct 2014

but if you are someone who just spent a week or so caring for someone with Ebola, and the first symptom is a fever and you are self monitoring, I know *I* personally wouldn't be all, "oh, it's ONLY 99.5, so it must not be Ebola and I'm SURE it's perfectly SAFE to fly." WTF? Fevers can escalate quickly. Oh, what the hell, if I was self monitoring after being a caregiver to someone with Ebola, I'd send my kids off to their grandparents and I'd isolate myself completely for 21 days, fever or not. But that's because I give a shit about others. I don't understand what this nurse was thinking, and I don't understand why the CDC has been SO incredibly nonchalant about all of this.

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
55. Probably
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 10:16 PM
Oct 2014

which is why it's SO important to make sure that professionals who treat patients with Ebola are trained properly and extensively - and that training SHOULD include some education and/or counselling on acknowledging one's own penchant for denial under these kinds of circumstances.

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
58. I know
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 11:31 PM
Oct 2014

which is why I'm not a fan of 'voluntary' in these circumstances. There's always one or two people who, if not in denial, instead think they are too special to have to comply. Although I don't know how you could possibly make it 'mandatory'. There is no easy solution here.

LisaL

(44,973 posts)
62. Dr. Nancy doesn't have Ebola.
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 11:48 PM
Oct 2014

Therefore not infectious. Yet she was put under mandatory quarantine.
The nurse actually was infected with Ebola. CDC directly clearly suspected that more nurses will get Ebola, and said as much. Yet CDC allowed her to fly.

LostInAnomie

(14,428 posts)
37. These kind of people are why we have warnings on Windex bottles...
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 08:29 PM
Oct 2014

... telling us to not spray it into our eyes.

How is it possible for people working in health care to be this stupid? It's not like Ebola is some mystery disease that no one has ever heard of. It has literally been in the news for months. They were at ground zero for the biggest medical news of the year. They had to know fully how deadly and infectious this disease is. It should be common sense for anyone with an 7th grade education to know that if you have been exposed to one of the worst diseases there is, you should not go on mass transportation.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
47. How is it possible for the CDC to be this stupid?
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 09:32 PM
Oct 2014

Look, if we are going to castigate medical personnel for following the CDC's direct advice after calling and asking a direct question, then we might as well hang it up now and all dive into our bunkers. CDC is in charge of making these rules. That's their role, their responsibility. They need to start fulfilling that role. They aren't now, and they haven't been.



Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
51. It sucks how many people want to kick down and kiss up
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 09:46 PM
Oct 2014

All this bashing of low level workers who are risking their lives dealing with literal crap while hampered and harassed by management that is actively evil is starting to tick me off.

LostInAnomie

(14,428 posts)
53. I'm just not buying it.
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 09:57 PM
Oct 2014

This nurse IS a professional and she was originallt told not to travel by the CDC. She knows how diseases spread and what to look out for. So, once she starts to develop a fever, instead of going to a doctor, what does she do? She has a phone conversation with someone with no real ability to diagnose her. That is absolutely irresponsible for a medical professional.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
57. They were never told not to travel by CDC. They had no restrictions on movement whatsoever.
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 10:47 PM
Oct 2014

She called the CDC to ask the direct question. That's as responsible as you can get.

If she had waited and gone to a local hospital, they would have called the CDC. That's the protocol in these cases. No one gets tested unless the CDC approves the test first.

CDC is and has been in control of this entire process. Here's the guidance from their website:
http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/hcp/interim-guidance-specimen-collection-submission-patients-suspected-infection-ebola.html

The following steps should be used in submitting samples to CDC.

Hospitals should follow their state and/or local health department procedures for notification and consultation for Ebola testing requests and prior to contacting CDC.
NO specimens will be accepted without prior consultation. For consultation call the EOC at 770-488-7100.
Contact your state and/or local health department and CDC to determine the proper category for shipment based on clinical history and risk assessment by CDC. State guidelines may differ and state or local health departments should be consulted prior to shipping.
Email tracking number to EOCEVENT246@CDC.GOV.
Do not ship for weekend delivery unless instructed by CDC.


It's still the same way:
http://www.statesmanjournal.com/story/news/health/2014/10/15/woman-isolated-salem-hospital-ebola-concerns/17325883/


LisaL

(44,973 posts)
59. I don't know.
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 11:35 PM
Oct 2014

Their director comes out and says other nurses are quite possibly infected.
Yet they allow a nurse to fly with a fever. Because her fever hasn't reached some magic number they somehow decided it had to reach.
So I can't understand how it is possible for the CDC to be so stupid.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
66. There are reasons why they might have wanted her to return to Dallas
Thu Oct 16, 2014, 07:54 AM
Oct 2014

You wouldn't want a possibly Ebola-infected person renting a car and driving for hours and hours, potentially becoming ill en-route and being involved in a car accident. The nightmare possibility is that HCW run into a person in trauma who needs emergency medical assistance WITHOUT knowing that the person is infected.

Their real choice was between telling her to get on that flight or telling her to seek care in a local hospital, which ran a risk of starting another set of exposures.

Nurses don't have charter planes.

calimary

(81,267 posts)
52. Not any sort of expert here, but why aren't those who've had direct exposure to
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 09:53 PM
Oct 2014

a gravely ill Ebola patient - put on a no-fly list?

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
60. Because it is unecessary. If someone is infected, the viral load builds over a long period of time.
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 11:45 PM
Oct 2014

The fever is the first symptom. It comes early and the viral load is low. The person is not very contagious. Essentially, they are theoretically contagious. Nor are they spreading their bodily fluids everywhere. It takes days to reach the point were the viral loads are high and the bodily fluids are spewing. Most infections occur just before or just after death. There is no evidence of infection by someone with only a fever.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
63. He is now, sure. This is an optics change. He got reamed in the media.
Wed Oct 15, 2014, 11:49 PM
Oct 2014

No one was at risk. It is why they gave the okay.

bklyncowgirl

(7,960 posts)
68. Optics count. Impressions count. Sometimes even more than facts.
Thu Oct 16, 2014, 08:33 AM
Oct 2014

You are very likely right. The problem is, however. reassuring as these facts are they will fall on deaf ears if the people uttering them appear to be doing things that seem stupid and even reckless to the average person. That woman had no business getting on that plane.

tblue37

(65,357 posts)
67. As I mentioned in an earlier post, the CDC person who approved her flying
Thu Oct 16, 2014, 08:04 AM
Oct 2014

seems to have confused two different sets of guidelines. The chart that person read from pertained to people in general who have been in the general vicinity of Ebola cases, not people (like health care workers) who have had direct exposure to symptomatic individuals with the disease. The guidelines for *that* group are more rigorous:

Controlled movement

Controlled movement requires people to notify the public health authority about their intended travel for 21 days after their last known potential Ebola virus exposure. These individuals should not travel by commercial conveyances (e.g. airplane, ship, long-distance bus, or train). Local use of public transportation (e.g. taxi, bus) by asymptomatic individuals should be discussed with the public health authority. If travel is approved, the exposed person must have timely access to appropriate medical care if symptoms develop during travel. Approved long-distance travel should be by chartered flight or private vehicle; if local public transportation is used, the individual must be able to exit quickly.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
71. Sounds like a training problem at the CDC
Thu Oct 16, 2014, 08:58 AM
Oct 2014

Whoever is on that phone really shouldn't have to be looking up this stuff, they should know it and then double check with the database to be sure..

In case of conflict between what they have learned and what's on the database the CDC phone operator should then call an actual expert.

The problem I see here is that no one who actually knows the stuff inside and out is answering the phone.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dallas Official: Ebola Ho...