Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

malaise

(269,054 posts)
Mon Nov 3, 2014, 09:07 PM Nov 2014

Is it Slavery Yet - DWP orders man to work without pay for company that let him go

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/nov/03/dwp-benefits-electrician-work-placement-labour
<snip>
Electronics specialist John McArthur, now unemployed, says he is living off 16p tins of spaghetti and without heating after being sanctioned by a jobcentre for refusing to work unpaid for LAMH Recycle in Motherwell, a Scottish social enterprise.

He says he was happy to work for LAMH under the now-defunct future jobs fund for the minimum wage in 2010-2011, but refuses on principle to do the same job unpaid.

McArthur, 59, says he is surviving on a monthly pension of £149 after the DWP stopped his unemployment benefit until January as punishment for his refusal to go on the 26-week community work placement (CWP).

For almost three months, McArthur has spent two hours each weekday morning parading outside the plant wearing a placard reading: “Say no to slave labour”.
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
1. Wow. He seems to be fighting some seriously scummy people...
Mon Nov 3, 2014, 10:38 PM
Nov 2014

Interesting story, and pretty widespread. Good for him.

Wonder about the companies profiting from the taxpayer-provided labor...


"
...
Last Wednesday, the DWP continued to battle the information commissioner and hostile court judgments ordering it to reveal where possibly hundreds of thousands of people are being sent to work without pay, sometimes for months at a time.

At the tribunal, the DWP argued that if the public knew exactly where people were being sent on placements political protests would increase, which was likely to lead to the collapse of several employment schemes and undermine the government’s economic interests.
...
“We are not naming the charities and community groups involved in the scheme in order to protect them from those who seem intent on stopping us helping people into work.”


If there was sunlight into their slavery the public wouldn't like it, so we don't want to give you info.

Please, I would like the name of the person who thought that argument up, so I can avoid them in the future.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
7. Haven't people proposed similar jobs plans on DU?
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 01:29 AM
Nov 2014

Pay people with public money to go do some sort of social good that needs to be done?

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
9. I don't mind paying for that - this is giving them money for working then one
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 08:07 AM
Nov 2014

day telling them to go do it for free. And oh, btw, we are going to take this other money that wasn't contingent too, if I understand his protest.

Change of rules, seems unfair from afar - and even if we don't think it is, he does, and that's enough for me.

In this case it's not exactly public or charity work, rather, it's for private profit run under charity umbrellas which I see as much different. Even if that isn't the case, if there is work that needs to be done they need to pay a wage.

I do think some effort should be a part of unemployment, if it really is to be a stopgap between jobs. Getting together, studying the market, realizing that the people you elected really don't give a rat's ass about you or your neighbors and you are on your own - maybe you can go in on a coop lawnmower and earn a few bucks together?

Unemployment It is not earned money, it is money paid into an insurance fund from which people who have a valid claim can be paid, to guard against what happens. I think limits against it becoming a vacation fund are appropriate.

But once that job is gone no one really knows if it is coming back. (I'm not talking about the arranged corporate giveaway to keep seasonal employees coming back) so there should be lots, and lots, and lots of opportunity to explore, learn, create, whatever, a way forward, just in case the plantation doesn't provide it.


LeftishBrit

(41,208 posts)
12. The name of the main person who thought it up is Iain Duncan-Smith
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 09:49 AM
Nov 2014

One of our worst government ministers (and this isn't even the very worst of his policies).

To give an idea what he's like: he once co-authored an article on Compassionate Conservativism with RICK SANTORUM!

marble falls

(57,106 posts)
2. Certainly sounds like slavery. Or even forced prison labor without even the benefits of even....
Mon Nov 3, 2014, 11:15 PM
Nov 2014

a prisoner shelter, nominal payment, food, clothing, medical treatment. Shocking!

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
6. It's "in return for" his public assistance
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 01:27 AM
Nov 2014

So calling it "unpaid" is a little iffy -- he's being paid by the government, not the company.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,321 posts)
11. But I think it would be at an effective rate well below the minimum wage
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 09:46 AM
Nov 2014

If it's the Job Seeker's Allowance, which it sounds like, then it would be £72.40 per week. The minimum wage is £6.50 per hour. If it's a roughly full time job, he'd be paid about £2 per hour. And it would make it harder for him to find a proper job - he's already worked at this place, so it's not as if this is would make his work experience look better; but it would mean he has less time to look for work.

LeftishBrit

(41,208 posts)
13. He is doing it in return for the dole; which is very much less than minimum wage; equates to about
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 09:51 AM
Nov 2014

2 pounds an hour.

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
3. We're all their SLAVES.....
Mon Nov 3, 2014, 11:53 PM
Nov 2014
- Just differing degrees. And they play those degrees off of us, in order to keep us at each others throats. Instead of theirs.....



K&R


In the year 1877, the signals were given for the rest of the century: the blacks would be put back; the strikes of white workers would not be tolerated; the industrial and political elites of North and South would take hold of the country and organize the greatest march of economic growth in human history. They would do it with the aid of, and at the expense of, black labor, white labor, Chinese labor, European immigrant labor, female labor, rewarding them differently by race, sex, national origin, and social class, in such a way as to create separate levels of oppression-a skillful terracing to stabilize the pyramid of wealth.

-- Howard Zinn
A People's History of the United States
- Chapter 11: Robber Barons And Rebels
 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
10. "From each according to his abilities. . ."
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 09:00 AM
Nov 2014

It's in exchange for his benefits. Seems reasonable enough.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is it Slavery Yet - DWP o...