Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSurprise! Controversial Patriot Act power now overwhelmingly used in drug investigations
One of the more controversial provisions of the Patriot Act was to broaden the sneak-and-peek power for federal law enforcement officials. The provision allows investigators to conduct searches without informing the target of the search. We were assured at the time that this was an essential law enforcement tool that would be used only to protect the country from terrorism. Supporters argued that it was critical that investigators be allowed to look into the lives and finances of suspected terrorists without tipping off those terrorists to the fact that they were under investigation.
Civil libertarian critics warned that the federal government already had this power for national security investigations. The Patriot Act provision was far too broad and would almost certainly become a common tactic in cases that have nothing to do with national security.
But this was all immediately after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, and there was little patience for civil libertarians. The massive Patriot Act of course passed overwhelmingly, including the sneak-and-peek provision, despite the fact that only a handful of members of Congress had actually read it. (Not to mention the public.)
<snip>
Civil libertarian critics warned that the federal government already had this power for national security investigations. The Patriot Act provision was far too broad and would almost certainly become a common tactic in cases that have nothing to do with national security.
But this was all immediately after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, and there was little patience for civil libertarians. The massive Patriot Act of course passed overwhelmingly, including the sneak-and-peek provision, despite the fact that only a handful of members of Congress had actually read it. (Not to mention the public.)
<snip>
Is anyone shocked by this??????
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-watch/wp/2014/10/29/surprise-controversial-patriot-act-power-now-overwhelmingly-used-in-drug-investigations/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 575 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Surprise! Controversial Patriot Act power now overwhelmingly used in drug investigations (Original Post)
Logical
Nov 2014
OP
Government Authority Intended for Terrorism is Used for Other Purposes
woo me with science
Nov 2014
#2
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)1. Surprised? Only that NATSEC laws are used on drug arrests...
...and not the other way around. Usually, the cutting edge if anti-Constitutional practices are distilled from the cow pies of da WOD.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)2. Government Authority Intended for Terrorism is Used for Other Purposes
Government Authority Intended for Terrorism is Used for Other Purposes
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025721614
Drug arrests are needed to keep the lucrative private prisons full. Even if it means spying on Americans and constructing false chains of evidence to arrest them.
Fascism has come to America.
Logical
(22,457 posts)3. So true. nt
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)4. Who could have imagined?