Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Should Dems let the pukes take the filibusterer away and just have Obama veto everything? (Original Post) pstokely Nov 2014 OP
Let them? WillowTree Nov 2014 #1
I don't think Dems will be able to stop them YarnAddict Nov 2014 #2
Not if we get a Bill Clinton-Obama SHRED Nov 2014 #3
Clinton had a worry about being re-elected, Obama doesn't pstokely Nov 2014 #6
Either way, I still prefer an actual Filibuster. Xyzse Nov 2014 #4
We gave it TO them. maced666 Nov 2014 #5
 

YarnAddict

(1,850 posts)
2. I don't think Dems will be able to stop them
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 12:50 AM
Nov 2014

anymore than the R's could stop it when the D's did it to them.

 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
3. Not if we get a Bill Clinton-Obama
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 12:50 AM
Nov 2014

I'll never forget the bullshit Clinton line after the Gingrich sweep..."the era of big government is over". I hope he doesn't turn Clinton on us any further than he has already.

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
4. Either way, I still prefer an actual Filibuster.
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 12:51 AM
Nov 2014

Not the crazy threat of a filibuster scaring everyone to inaction.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should Dems let the pukes...