General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAre Amercans really this stupid,
Or could there have been widespread shenanigans? Some of these results are almost impossible to believe.
shenmue
(38,506 posts)jaysunb
(11,856 posts)Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)maced666
(771 posts)Taking it to the streets.....
NOW
JEB
(4,748 posts)nc4bo
(17,651 posts)That's not democracy.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)and we documented shenanigans re McConnell and the fake mailers. The polls closing at the regular time even though their was a blackout in a heavy Democratic County in Florida. And of course all the outright lies in campaign ads.
Blaukraut
(5,693 posts)The President's party fared badly, with only a few exceptions. So yes, Americans are really this stupid. They want instant gratification, and if they don't get it, vote the bums out. The only bum they ever notice is the one in the spotlight. The President. They can't vote him out, so they go after the next best thing. Those who share his party affiliation in congress.
Dumbassery at its finest. Only in America.
politicman
(710 posts)Its not that they want instant gratification, its that they see that the 1%ers have already had the best 6 year period of their lives and they ask if the 1%ers can have such an improvement to their portfolios in this 6 year period, then why cant the normal folks also have that same level of improvement in their ordinary lives.
Be honest with yourselves, the 1%ers have never had such a period in their lives where they have made so much money in such a short period of time and the normal people still have to suffer with working 2 and 3 jobs just to pay the rent, and this has all come about precisely because Obama and his policies have allowed it to happen.
Qutzupalotl
(14,311 posts)Which is the convenient starting point of your measurement, and the reason for the talking point. The stock market took off again after bottoming out after the recession. That's why the portfolios did better. It's not any particular policy by this president, but it did come as a result of him staving off total economic collapse.
As to income inequality, the rich have been getting dramatically richer for decades but that really took off under Bush. Try again.
politicman
(710 posts)The rich have had the best 6 years of their lives.
Corporate profits are at all time highs under Obama, the stock market is also at all time highs, YET the poor and working class have less and less.
So wake up.
Qutzupalotl
(14,311 posts)You can't.
That's because income inequality has been building for a generation, starting with Saint Ronnie and taking off under W.
We can elect candidates that raise the minimum wage and spur job creation, or we can try to rewrite history as you are doing.
renate
(13,776 posts)History repeating itself... thus has it ever been with midterms and especially with second-term midterms.
Blaukraut
(5,693 posts)Voters are stupid, and they always will be. The demographics in presidential years favor the Democrats, so we're looking at a Dem presidency for the foreseeable future, and an ever changing Senate, and periodically changing House. Legislatively speaking, it is getting closer and closer to a permanent stalemate.
Suich
(10,642 posts)Rachel Maddow covered this last night. Truman, Eisenhower, Reagan, shrub, Clinton and now Obama, work their last two years with an opposition Congress.
I have no idea what happened in all the Governor's races that went to the GOP...Florida, Kansas, Wisconsin...really???
Gutting of the Voting Rights Act by scotus probably had something to do with it.
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)Yeh, people really are this stupid. That's why I've become a semi-recluse these past years. I can't stand most of them and their bigotries and stupidities.
And when there is an understanding between ALL the media that Obama bad, and Republicans are misunderstood human beings trying to help you (picture Fuck Chodd's pie hole jawing here) there really is little hope. At least that is how I feel tonight.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)If I could afford it, I would be a total recluse, or at least almost total. There are a few people I like, but sadly, hardly any of them live around my neighborhood. The stoopid is so strong in this area where I live.
Logical
(22,457 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)We have been talking since the Bush coup in 2000 how inadequate our elections system is. There is no checks or verification of results by unbiased observers. There is so much we can do like use the Canadian system and instant run-off voting, yet no one seems to want to make this happen.
Rex
(65,616 posts)At least those involving the GOP.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)with one disaster after another. So, yes, there is no shortage of stupid, it just went underground for a few years out of shame.
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)insinuating everyone is stupid, in my humble opinion.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)I honestly didn't think they were this stupid until these results started rolling in.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)will suffer and suffer mightily and probably will never even realize how their racism sabotaqed them.
WhiteAndNerdy
(365 posts)People in general are apparently this stupid . . . I very seriously doubt it's a uniquely American problem.
K lib
(153 posts)WhiteAndNerdy
(365 posts)immoderate
(20,885 posts)And it's enforced by the political apparatus. Some countries (cultures?) have worked around this. Some may be worse, but without US power.
I think that climate denial is uniquely American. Yes, there are crackpots all over, but they rarely control a government. But tremendous resources have been lavished on producing those science deniers. Same with having the worst health care system in the world. Gangsters. But legal.
Remember, everybody thinks they're smart.
--imm
Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)The concentration of power in the hands of the few (This insures the NEEDS of the many are ignored in favor of the WANTS of the very few).
Our government was structured to avoid that (Checks and Balances).
The founding fathers warned us of this, Washington, Jefferson, Madison all warned us about allowing people or organizations to amass too much influence.
2naSalit
(86,614 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)J_J_
(1,213 posts)But If we believe the lying corporate media and easily manipulated voting machines that tell us after lying us into wars,
creating massive debts with tax cuts, then hypocritically bashing Dems for all the problems they caused...
that Americans actually turned out to vote in more selfish sociopathic bastards...then yes, I guess we are stupid, but not in the way that you mean.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)Codeine
(25,586 posts)It happens. We knocked 'puke heads around in the tail-end of the Pretzeldunce's administration, and we'll do well in '16. Politics is cyclical.
Baitball Blogger
(46,709 posts)It has to be big in order to avoid automatic recounts.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)DebJ
(7,699 posts)take over by the dead of heart.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)Best answer yet.
mvd
(65,173 posts)Yes Americans it seems will never learn. They get progress in the economy and other things but still go the wrong way. It has a good chance of happening even if we win in 2016. Too many voters are shallow and just vote out the party in power blindly if something they wanted to happen did not. Or they are low information and believe lies. Granted because The President compromised too much and because of Repuke obstruction, the middle class hasn't felt economic benefits like they should. But I'm losing a ton of faith in ever going in a progressive direction for long. We could very well go hard right without much way back except to divide America. We must stand for traditional Democratic values.
Oh and because of the spread between polls and the results, shenanigans could have also been involved.
Very disgusted tonight.
meadowlark5
(2,795 posts)I think people are so stuck in their ideological ways that they will never deviate. I also think there are people who just don't care anymore. And then there are the less than educated that are easily manipulated with fear. But what I really think is something is being done insidiously with the voting process. With the kind of money available to republicans by the rich who benefit from republicans in office, I think over the past 2 years, a lot of sneaky things have been worked on and put in place to tamper with the votes and do it in an undetectable way.
Lydia Leftcoast
(48,217 posts)and quite steeped in that culture (only not racist or tolerant of racism), but very bright otherwise. He knows a lot about computers, and although he probably voted straight R, he does not like machine voting. At all.
Lydia Leftcoast
(48,217 posts)Liberal Lolita
(82 posts)Here in Michigan the pollsters had the Governor's race even. Snyder won by 10%. The local media was asking a pollster how they got it so wrong. I'm not convinced they got it wrong, especially in light of all the blue states that have suddenly gone red. Not to say I haven't encountered plenty of stupid voters.