Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Q: Do you support Harry Reid for Minority Leader or... (Original Post) book_worm Nov 2014 OP
I'd like Warren to get it just so people here will understand it doesn't come with magical powers Recursion Nov 2014 #1
We definitely need someone who understands parliamentary Senate rules book_worm Nov 2014 #3
Time for Reid to go. AngryAmish Nov 2014 #2
Who book_worm Nov 2014 #4
LBJ? AngryAmish Nov 2014 #7
Time for Reid to go demwing Nov 2014 #5
Reid did one thing very well. Whether or not it turned out to be the right thing to do is Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2014 #6
He's a nice man get the red out Nov 2014 #8
I wrote essays here about how Harry is in the pocket of the Mining Industry Zorra Nov 2014 #9
We do not have a vote in this process. MADem Nov 2014 #10

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
1. I'd like Warren to get it just so people here will understand it doesn't come with magical powers
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 09:23 AM
Nov 2014

But, that's just me.

book_worm

(15,951 posts)
4. Who
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 09:25 AM
Nov 2014

in your opinion knows the senate rules well enough and would be tough enough to take Reid's place?

 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
7. LBJ?
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 09:43 AM
Nov 2014

What has been repuduated is the old way of doing things. Reid's ideas are old. He is old. His ideas don't work and do not help the American people.

Time for new things. people are hurting. Reid could not help.

Move aside, Reid. You are not helping.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
6. Reid did one thing very well. Whether or not it turned out to be the right thing to do is
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 09:33 AM
Nov 2014

the question.

Reid blocked things coming to the floor, over and over. To some extent, this meant that the President didn't have to veto anything much. But it also meant that neither Repubs nor Dems in the Senate wound up building a portfolio of 'tough votes' on which they'd voted. He kept everyone from having to go on the record. Now Republicans were willing to go all in on being behind Republican values, even if they weren't taking the votes. But all too many Democrats instead wanted to be a mix of Democratic and Republican values. And had no real votes to point to to show they really were Dems.

Midterms are always an appeal to the 'extremes' of the party, the people who actually care about your values. So all of these wishy-washy 'Well, I am a Dem, but I agree with Repubs on coal, guns, education, nsa surveillance, ....' Dems got their butts handed to them, because they instead tried to appeal to 'the middle'.

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
9. I wrote essays here about how Harry is in the pocket of the Mining Industry
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 09:53 AM
Nov 2014

going back to 2006, when I found out they were going to elect him Senate Majority Leader.

"Democrats moving to the middle is a double disaster that alienates the party's progressive base while simultaneously sending a message to swing voters that the other side is where the good ideas are.' It unconsciously locks in the notion that the other side's positions are worth moving toward, while your side's positions are the ones to move away from. Plus every time you move to the center, the right just moves further to the right." ~ George Lakoff


MADem

(135,425 posts)
10. We do not have a vote in this process.
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 09:58 AM
Nov 2014

The people who will vote for the Senate leadership are the people who will sit in the Senate.

Not us. This has nothing to do with us--congressional leaders are chosen by congresspersons.

There's a lot that goes on behind the scenes that we don't see. A person who is a mild-mannered type to the public can be a firebrand in private. Or a superb organizer or motivator. It's not our call who they want to represent their interests in dealing with the other side in Congress.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Q: Do you support Harry ...