General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWell we made possession of heroin, meth and cocaine
a misdemeanor in CA last night.
meadowlark5
(2,795 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)meadowlark5
(2,795 posts)Holy shit. What was the reasoning behind that?
Is CA trying to compete with Washington and Colorado for the funnest drug state?
MH1
(17,600 posts)and b) reduce the number of people with TOTALLY effed up lives after a "relatively minor" offense.
Not sure I would agree in all the details, but if those are the goals, I applaud the intent.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)This is going to keep tens of thousands of low-level, non-violent drug possessors out of California's jails and prisons. It's going to save the state and its counties hundreds of millions of dollars a year.
The sponsors were the San Francisco DA and the San Diego police chief.
meadowlark5
(2,795 posts)I forgot about possession of small amounts of drugs that can send someone to the state pen for years. I rmember how many people would land in prison for small amounts of pot. Crazy.
ryan_cats
(2,061 posts)And how much is it going to cost when these methheads commit crimes?
Meth is deadly, there's only three ways out, 1, get arrested, 2, quit and 3, die.
I could care less if pot is legalized, in fact I was surprised Ca. didn't vote to legalize it.
Meth, Heroin and coke are extremely dangerous drugs. I know what people will say, as long as the heroin user gets his dope, he's OK, except for when he has to steal to get it.
Coke and Meth turn you into a hyperactive monster, there is no medical use for Meth except for when the USAF gives it to pilots on long missions and then they stop.
The prison overcrowding is a excuse to let these people6 free.
Would you like a methhead living next door to you, would you like it if one dated your sister?
MH1
(17,600 posts)Not everyone succumbs to addiction. Similarly to how many of us can drink alcohol socially and not become alcoholics, yet for others, alcoholism comes quickly after starting to drink.
I'm not saying I agree wholeheartedly with the measure, because I don't know the details. Even though many people can handle even coke and heroin, I consider them highly dangerous and would want to know the details. But I probably would have voted for it as the lesser of evils.
The total cost of crimes committed by druggies not intercepted, will probably be less than the total cost of the former system of locking so many people up (including the relatively harmless) and ruining their lives completely. The total cost in ruined lives is probably less, too. But yes, some will be hurt that might have been "protected" by being caught and locked up sooner. It's a tradeoff. I'll take the side where less people get locked up.
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)that there are more casual meth users than you would expect.
I have had four pretty good friends who had done meth in the past, and with at least three of them, you wouldn't guess it.
Alittleliberal
(528 posts)Even our most addictive illicit drug (Heroin) is only a 22% addiction rate. Way more casual drug users of all kinds then people think.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)ryan_cats
(2,061 posts)Last edited Sun Nov 9, 2014, 12:47 PM - Edit history (1)
In Colorado where pot is legal, DUIs went up 11% due to pot and I support pot legalization.
It is insanity to legalize meth or coke and don't give me the I've known coke users you couldn't even tell they were on it. B.S. I knew a lot of meth, coke users and their entire life's goal was to score more drugs, yes, let's legalize that. Oh yeah, when one of my acquaintances wife had to decide between meth and her kids, guess what, she dropped her kids off at a relatives. Yeah, let's leaglize that.
Alittleliberal
(528 posts)However it has little to do with what should be legal or not. There is plenty of destructive behavior that isn't illegal nor should it be.
RedCappedBandit
(5,514 posts)Addiction is not a criminal issue. It is a medical issue. It has no place in the criminal justice system. By sending people to prison for drug offenses you simply further entrench them into a world of crime and diminish the possibility that they will have a brighter future.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)prescribed in treatments of ADHD and obesity.
Meth is a class 2 felony in this state but it doesn't stop anyone who wants to.
To answer your question, I live in an apartment complex and have a few that live near me. Don't bother me. If I had a sister, I wouldn't get in her business. If she was dating one it probably means she is using the stuff too.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Moondog
(4,833 posts)WhiteTara
(29,715 posts)Is pot still schedule 2?
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)sandpan
(34 posts)MH1
(17,600 posts)Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)As long as the amount is less than 950.
dilby
(2,273 posts)Possession is only harming yourself and I have seen individuals who make a mistake get busted and then can not get a job after that because they have a felony on their record which leads them further down the rabbit hole of a life of crime.
mahina
(17,656 posts)Last edited Wed Nov 5, 2014, 02:21 PM - Edit history (1)
Of same I wonder?
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)About 46,000 are eligible.
Imagine! 46,000 people in prison who didn't do anything to anybody, but just possessed the wrong substance. That's insane.
SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)for real treatment centers for the ones who want to quit, it's a win-win
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Barbara County Alcohol, Drug and Mental Health Services. We have been getting increases in grants for substance abuse and mental health treatment. In the millions in our county alone.
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)Or can everybody carry a key or two with them.
Possession of more than a certain amount is considered "possession with intent to sell", which remains a felony.
derby378
(30,252 posts)If you want something to push the limits of Obamacare, it'll be patients who are strung out on this stuff. Pot usually isn't a problem unless it's adulterated - just keep them from getting behind the wheel and it'll be fine.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)addiction then people won't seek help. If their reward for getting help is prison you will never get them to voluntarily seek treatment.
It costs a hell of a lot more money to lock them up than to rehabilitate them. So basically we are taking the money we would have used to warehouse them and treating them instead.
derby378
(30,252 posts)I think certain areas of Texas are trying that, including my hometown. If a cop busts you while you're holding, sure, that won't help your case, but it seems like there's been more of a push to get addicts to seek treatment.
One of my in-laws was addicted to meth. After a couple of rehab centers and a drastic change of scenery that didn't involve jail time, he's free and clear of the damnable stuff. I know kicking it is hard to do, but he pulled it off.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Why should the state be able to throw you in prison for possessing a sugar packet's worth of a powder? Really.
And you presume that drug users need drug treatment. Maybe some do. Plenty don't. And plenty quit without ever going to treatment. They just grow out of it.
dilby
(2,273 posts)They also make it super hard for people who have Felonies on their records to get decent jobs later in life. I have a friend who made some stupid mistakes in life, he was a programmer for Silicon Valley software company making 6 figures when he made these mistakes. A year later he can't get a job at a startup company because of his felony drug record.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)We would rather take in a starving dog or a bird with a broken wing than a person with a drug habit.
Alittleliberal
(528 posts)Of any kind be a felony?
derby378
(30,252 posts)We've all been through the Reefer Madness propaganda and the talk that smoking pot inevitably leads to the harder stuff, and we realize all of that is hogwash now.
There are some drugs that are simply too dangerous. They can produce violent and unpredictable behavior in people. They often kill over time - just look at Billy Mays and his slow but unnoticed downward spiral from cocaine use. If you're going to have a national healthcare framework like Obamacare in place, this hurts the taxpayer in the long run.
Unchecked drug use is a public safety issue as well as a public health issue. There's an argument to treat firearms as falling under both auspices, so why not apply the same logic to meth or cocaine?
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)then the cost of treating them. Get off that taxpayer bull shit.
derby378
(30,252 posts)...I wish you and your fellow workers the best. I've seen good people brought low by drugs, and I know their hold can be tough to break. And if your intervention helps empty the prisons, how could I say no to that?
If I might ask, are there still felony charges for dealing, in most cases?
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Grants are getting bigger. This year alone we got 9 million for crisis intervention crisis residential treatment and three crisis teams.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Alittleliberal
(528 posts)Should be fundamental. I'm a pothead. But because my vice of choice isn't as dangerous that doesn't mean other people don't have the right to use theirs.
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)By a mile.
If you are trying to reduce the harm caused by drugs, step one is to stop throwing users in prison. On the other hand if you just want to punish people for doing things you disapprove of, carry on.
hunter
(38,312 posts)Addiction is an illness.
Prison is an expensive, utterly insane way to treat an illnesses.
Quite a few mentally ill people who don't use drugs or fail in their attempts to self-medicate end up in prison too.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)Meth possession is a class 2 felony in Arizona the same as kidnapping, child porn, manslaughter, and sexual assault but it hasn't made a difference. Still users all over the place.
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Boom Sound 416 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)Not manufacturing. Manufacturing is still a felony. Besides, busting for possession sure hasn't worked well. There are as many crack heads now as there have ever been. Let's try treatment instead.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)It's been a HUGE SUCCE$$!!!!!!!!!!$$$!!!!!!!!
Boom Sound 416
(4,185 posts)What I said was just too quick of a response
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)"WHAT ARE THOSE WASCAWWY WABBITS DOING TO MY NICE GWAVY TWAAAAAAIN?????"
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Might as well call that law "The Hollywood Exemption"
MerryBlooms
(11,769 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)What is the point of putting drug users in prison?
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Hekate
(90,686 posts)...privatized prisons business. I'm glad my state is moving on it.
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)nt