General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAlison Grimes' strategy of running away from Obama and to the right proved to be an utter DISASTER
In order to beat Mitch McConnell, Alison Grimes thought it would be a brilliant idea to actually morph into Mitch McConnell and slam Obama's policies on everything from immigration to energy.
Hell...she wouldn't even say if she voted for that black dude in the White House, Barack Obama. This strategy, she thought, would make her a REAL Kentuckian and surely it would win her the Senate seat that she craved so desperately.
Grimes even thought it would be a fantastic move to hit McConnell from the right and accuse him of providing amnesty and taxpayer benefits to "illegal aliens"----->>>http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025669596
It was a foolproof strategy that would guarantee her victory.
So what happened?
She got her ass handed to her on a silver fucking platter.
Grimes wasn't the only one to pursue this strategy. In almost every case where the Democrat thought it would be a brilliant idea to run to the right of Obama, they got their asses handed to them.
Harry Truman said it best:
tularetom
(23,664 posts)Keep pulling this crap for the next two years and you won't be elected dog catcher.
Tommy2Tone
(1,307 posts)He wanted to be his own man and ran away from Bill Clinton, despite the fact that Clinton is loved by the democratic party. Now Hillary has to put a sock in Bill as well. We will punish her is she doesn't embrace Obama, and the other side is going to link they no matter what she does.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)and even now it wasn't the Hillary from 2007 and before. Wonder what happened to that Hillary and Truman sure is gonna get quoted. I say that quote should be given like a static line along the top of this site.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Skinner needs to fix that!! My poor nail, i just grew them out all even. Now one is jacked up.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)It's been rough, but I'm feeling positive.
sheshe2
(83,791 posts)I'm still feeling positive, even though I am stuck with a damn R for Governor, in a blue state no less.
We got rid of the Republican and got the Independent (unity) ticket. And weed. And minimum wage. That's why I feel positive. Liberal policies won, even if we need better candidates.
sheshe2
(83,791 posts)Well we did send Senator Markey-D back to Washington. And have a wonderful new AG.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I'm glad you kept your senator. I think we lost ours, but we will fight smarter and harder next time.
Wabbajack_
(1,300 posts)Palin endorsed him, is Palin a "RINO" now?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)But yes. Basically he was a republican before the Tea Party.
Cha
(297,323 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Thanks, Cha! I see you gave monsanto a beating... Love that! Small victories add up!
Cha
(297,323 posts)by a slim margin in Oregon for the labeling law. BIG $$$$$$ is wiping out America!
But, of course, we'll NEVER NEVER EVER GIVE UP!!
Small GMO farming ban. Some people decided to vote on issues.
We can keep demanding labeling, it will work. It took a few times, but we legalized weed. Every election should have progressive legislation on the ballot.
Cha
(297,323 posts)and knew you must be talking about that. Yay Maui! I wish we on Kaua'i were so fortunate!
We did have a Record turnout for Voting here, though!
Yes, I had the same thoughts about keep "demanding" and working on the labeling and eventually... !
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)You can't say running away from the President caused her loss. The Governor of Illinois, Maryland, Florida, Massachusetts welcomed him with open arms and shown the door.
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)that only she, with the help and advice of the Clintons I am betting, could do so fantastically well in that moronic empty head of hers.
liberal N proud
(60,336 posts)When asked if she voted for him, all she would have had to say was yes and McConnell couldn't have made as big a deal about it.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)but then take the offensive and say what policies the Dems delivered on and how they positively affected the people of Kentucky, then point out that McConnell tried to block all those positive things from happening.
It's really not that hard, but Democrats fuck it up every time they try to make believe they are Republican Lite.
Tommy2Tone
(1,307 posts)When the president was on the ballot(2008-2012) he smoked the right's asses. He even brought along a lot of democrats in red states. When he wasn't on the ballot(2010-2014) the democrats lost seats.
Democrats need to have better candidates. Obama can only do so much. The four you mentioned were perfect evidence of how bad candidates get bad results.
BarackTheVote
(938 posts)A lot of people didn't like the way he was going about pension reform and the state debt. Dick Durbin won handily, as did all of the progressive initiatives and we kept a supermajority in the state house and senate.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Ykcutnek
(1,305 posts)No one can beat Mitch.
He's in there until he retires or old age decides he won't be.
If she runs for governor, she'll probably win by 15-20%... it's just how Kentucky rolls.
kentuck
(111,103 posts)as she did. She tried. Maybe her strategy was wrong but it was all she had. In contrast, Mark Pryor lost Arkansas by even a larger margin and he had Bill and Hillary supporting him.
Ykcutnek
(1,305 posts)She was the only one with the guts to run against Mitch.
There are rumors in the Louisville press that Adam Edelden was going to run, but Mitch dug up some nasty details about his divorce and then they recruited Grimes.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Kentucky Democrats, along with Bill Clinton, possibly worried about the potential pitfalls of an Ashley Judd candidacy, are reportedly pushing another state Democrat to challenge Sen. Mitch McConnell in 2014.
Politico reports that Clinton is courting Alison Lundergan Grimes, the Kentucky secretary of state, to get into the race:
Grimes does have the Clintons in her corner. Earlier this month, the former president a longtime friend of Grimess father privately urged the young secretary of state to mount a Senate bid while assuring Grimes that both he and his wife, Hillary, would get behind her should she decide to take on the powerful Senate GOP leader, according to several sources familiar with the matter.
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)deals that actually compete with Kent coal miners. He speaks from both sides of his wife's wealthy mouth. And don't forget the cocaine found aboard one of his ships. Neither McConnell or his father-in-law may have known about it but just think what the GOP would have done with an incident like that against the Dems.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)in elections is huge. I agree with your point about the cocaine-on-board thing. If tables were turned, they Republicans would have buried the Democrat with it.
Ykcutnek
(1,305 posts)kentuck
(111,103 posts)..once that became public..
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)The Grimes/Clintons campaign failed spectacularly. They ran a typical Third Way campaign of Repulican Lite hubris.
If we're going to lose, let it be on Democratic principles and not quasiRepublican ideas.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)They chased her off early; I wonder what she might have accomplished had she stuck it out.
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)But Clinton's hammer came down on that idea and they put in a moron instead.
Ykcutnek
(1,305 posts)Period.
McConnell would have spent less than half the money he spent against Grimes and would have won by 30% instead of 15.
theHandpuppet
(19,964 posts)Too many here aren't interested in the truth.
She had sought psychiatric help. She would have been destroyed.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)If a candidate with a 22-count felony indictment against him and had threatened a reporter on live TV can win an election, Ms. Judd's medical history was almost certainly small potatoes.
No, it was Kentucky Democrats and Bill Clinton who were smearing Ms. Judd whispering about her mental health aggressively. They had a candidate in mind and weren't about to let someone they considered uppity (deja vu?) get in the way.
And they lost.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)"Close" doesn't count in American politics. Not in the least. Winner takes all.
So, if this is the result a democrat gets when pretending to be a conservative republican to run agaisnt an incumbent conservative republican...
Why not just not run as a conservative republican Why not try being, oh I dunno, a liberal democrat?
Republicans will not vote for a conservative Democrat. Nor will a great many Democrats. It's a self-suppressing "strategy."
Maybe running left wouldn't have won against McConnell either. But at least Grimes could lose as a progressive and have some dignity, instead of losing as a conservative and looking like a giant fucking sellout.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Some reasons might be overlapping, but there is no one-size-fits-all excuse here.
I think you are right about Grimes, and that is what most of your op is about.
"Grimes wasn't the only one to pursue this strategy. In almost every case where the Democrat thought it would be a brilliant idea to run to the right of Obama, they got their asses handed to them. "
I find fault with those two sentences and your would really need to back them up more in order to make your assumption even debatable. It would require you to make the case that democrats who fully embraced Obama overwhelmingly won.
Bandit
(21,475 posts)Obama didn't pass any laws or bills, Democrats did. All Obama did was sign them into Law. When Democrats run away from their own damn Legislation there is a problem.. Yes Obama is pronounced unpopular by the right but the Policies were not. Why did most Democrats run away from their won damn policies? When asked about Obamacare why did they/she say lets fix it as if it is a piece of crap. Why didn't she say "look how many Kentuckians now have health care coverage compared to before DEMOCRATS passed the ACA". How many Americans are now covered because of DEMOCRATS, not Obama but Democrats.. But run run run and lost lost lost...Democrats simply won't fight as hard for their beliefs as Republicans and Americans want people that will fight..
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)As much as I don't like many aspects of ObamaCare, it could have been used extremely well on the campaign trail. So many good things could have been said about it that fit in a sound bite. Fix it should have never crossed a democrats lips. Same with many other policies.
kentuck
(111,103 posts)So something was definitely wrong.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)still_one
(92,219 posts)LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)before the election, but wtf, you fucking moron?
Is this the advice Mark Penn gave you? I can't shake the feeling the Clintons had something to do with this wonderful and winning strategy, all for their own benefit in the future.
Alison, you are dumb as a bag of hammers. Go away.
I wish Ashley Judd would have been the candidate. Not this moronic stupido on puppet strings.
kentuck
(111,103 posts)No one would have done as well.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)I agree that she took the wrong tack, but we can't really predict what would have happened had she gone the other way.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)until someone tries it...
One thing for sure running as looney lite doesn't work every time.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)the other way. We'll never known now.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)I think she chose wrong. She could have just said "Damn right I voted for him" and talked about how many Kentuckians benefited from the ACA, for example.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)zipplewrath
(16,646 posts)She gave the wrong answer to a question whose content should have been anticipated. A lot of different ways it could have been asked, including questions about Senate leadership. But they should have been prepared with something that basically stated the truth, as well as why, while minimizing the sound bite usefulness to the GOP smear machine.
"I voted for the democratic candidate because I'm a democrat and the best chance for Kentucky is if I'm able to represent my home state with a democratic majority in the Senate and a democratic president in the White House."
Hard to turn that into a 5 second sound bite, I don't care what part you edit out.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)"I'm running as a democrat but I'm OK because I'm pretty much like the Republicans."
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)She allowed McConnell to direct the narrative, and then inevidably played right into it.
This case should be textbook - how NOT to run a campaign.
kentuck
(111,103 posts)they ran against Obama in every campaign... It worked better in some places than other. Obama was hated in Kentucky.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)She spent way too much time and energy distancing herself from Obama. It made her look disingenuous and weak, IMO....
kentuck
(111,103 posts)But she wasn't the only one. They all lost. It was a strategy by Republicans to put Obama on the ballot in every race. They knew he was unpopular. Moreso in some states than others. None moreso than Kentucky.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Cha
(297,323 posts)yes I voted for Obama and here's why... insert accomplishments that mean something and be proud of it. Do not mitch make you into chicken little. 'Cause he's the big Lyin' Chicken.
UTUSN
(70,711 posts)Last edited Fri Nov 7, 2014, 12:34 PM - Edit history (1)
Instead of running away and not touting the accomplishments.
[font size=5]"How much worse could it possibly have been for all of them had they stood by the president and his record?"[/font]--Charles P. PIERCE, http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/Election_Night_2014
Cha
(297,323 posts)Damn, we'll never know.
still_one
(92,219 posts)A Democrat won a Senate race in Ky?
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)and we'll find out how running as a real liberal works when someone tries it someday.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Things are becoming clearer.
still_one
(92,219 posts)LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)We know running AWAY from Democratic principles results in a huge loss. Maybe we should try a different approach.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)Anything is possible that doesn't violate the laws of physics.
treestar
(82,383 posts)If the conservatives could only hear the liberals really being liberal, they'd turn into liberals. That's naively idealistic.
Right wingers think the same. If we only heard real conservatives, we'd turn into Bible thumpers.
Response to treestar (Reply #52)
JuanHamonrye Spam deleted by MIR Team
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)I'm sure you know a lot of conservatives. Birds of a feather and all.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)we know what they believe and think...and it's all nonsense. Democrats need to focus getting sane people to vote them, not conservatives.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)if you explain it right. Just don't call them liberal views. Grimes lost because she didn't defend the liberal programs that were popular in Kentucky, she let Yertle the Turtle DEFINE her as a "liberal" and never bother to define herself other than "not Obama".
still_one
(92,219 posts)would be demanding that they adopt Bernie Sanders views.
Your premise that most people support liberal views I do not think is a valid assumption
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)supports Social Security or Medicare? All conservatives who get arrested refuse court-appointed attorneys? All conservatives reject disability benefits, unemployment, and student loans/grants?
Most people support liberal views when it comes to their own situation. The job of a sensible candidate is to frame it that way.
still_one
(92,219 posts)Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)how unusual.
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)than to flounder and flop, and run away from her principles and still lose.
still_one
(92,219 posts)Deans' 50 state strategy.
Some states want liberal representation, and we should run liberals in those states. Some states want conservative representation, and we should run conservatives in those states, if we follow the Howard Dean strategy
hatrack
(59,587 posts)She was pathetic - a fearful, timid little (small-d) democrat flinching at her own shadow and unwilling to come out and fucking FIGHT.
When your opponent lies (as McTurtle did, saying that he'd repeal ACA, but residents of Kentucky could keep Kynect, which was unadulterated bullshit) CALL him on it.
Candidates who refuse to fight back, who refuse to say what they believe in, who refuse to take on their opponents, do not deserve to win. Grimes sure as shit fit this bill.
fadedrose
(10,044 posts)still_one
(92,219 posts)negoldie
(198 posts)in the 80's early 90's when Wendall Ford ran his last campaign. Slips my mind who Jim Bunning ran against after Ford retired. Someone will jog my memory I'm sure.
Lastly, don't take the Clinton's advice. Learn to lead with your heart dumbass. Many of us democrats can see a conservadem from miles away.....I voted Grimes, spoke to hundreds of folks that supported Grimes. Saw nothing but Grimes signs in folks yard, yet the turtle triumphs again because he can always say I'm awful, bad for the country, worse senator ever. But my opponent is worse. He has run every campaign since he defeated Huddleston back in '84. Slimy fucker that McConnell.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)Learning experience for dinos.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)and at Kos (who were shouted down by the "pragmatists" who accused us of being purity trolls) who could foreseen such and outcome?
DinahMoeHum
(21,794 posts). . .for ANYTHING our current POTUS says or does. I don't give a fuck what the factoids are.
TomCADem
(17,390 posts)Unfortunately, many Democrats end up adopting Fox News type talking points in an effort to close the distance between themselves and their Republican rivals in the false hope that they would be seen as an acceptable alternative by mid-term voters who tend to skew older white. The problem is that it does not work. If you can't win in a lowturn out election, then run in a Presidential year with our base, rather than trying to kowtow to the Republican base.
Boom Sound 416
(4,185 posts)She ran to the Clintons
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)Boom Sound 416
(4,185 posts)Old Nick
(468 posts)And I have ZERO sympathy.
Robbins
(5,066 posts)She rana way from Obama because she voted for romney.
Grimes is loyal to herself and the Clintons.Not to dems and leadership.
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)theHandpuppet
(19,964 posts)For the Republicans, at least.
treestar
(82,383 posts)The state is very red, so she'd have lost in McGovern numbers likely with a real, real, Democratic leftist progressive platform. I don't think someone like her is dumb. It's just going to be hard for Democrats in states like that. We've had this argument over Blue Dogs, too. It is reality that the people in those states are majority really, really, religious and conservative.
sheshe2
(83,791 posts)tritsofme
(17,380 posts)Especially in the final stretch. Her Obama vote question was probably the dumbest political answer I have ever heard.
The woman was an Obama delegate for chrissakes!
Running to the right wasn't necessarily her problem, she was in Kentucky where Obama had a 30% approval rating so it would always be a tall climb, but the unforced errors doomed her.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)As I've said elsewhere, she portrayed herself as a gun shootin', coal lovin, jesus fearin, can't-remember-my-party-affiliation almost-like-a-republican candidate. Is it any wonder the base stayed home?
kentuck
(111,103 posts)I don't agree with your portrayal. Just because she shot a gun or defended the coal miners in her state, does not make her a "Republican". She took some very progressive stands. But, I guess there might be some issues that would disqualify her with many progressives here? Soon, if we keep that attitude, we will have less than 100 members in the House... for real.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)fired up the base?
kentuck
(111,103 posts)So Rand Paul will have to resign his Senate seat if he wants to run for President.
I think it could have been much worse. She got about 600,000 votes, which was not bad for an apathetic Party.
Under the circumstances, nobody was going to beat Mitch McConnell, in Kentucky, the Leader of the Republican Party.
We may note that some Democrats did worse than Alison under less challenging conditions.
riversedge
(70,242 posts)know enough about ken politics and have only observed from afar. But she was up against a powerful man in Congress. I give her credit for trying--and for giving Mitch a rough time. I am sorry to see Mitch in congress as the head man. He has been there far too long and should have been put out to pasture!
SansACause
(520 posts)Obama crushed Romney 51-47 % in 2012. That's the biggest blowout Presidential win in modern history. Clinton never got 50% of the vote in either of his two elections! Two years later, his own party ran away from him in hopes of bamboozling voters into thinking they were Republicans instead of Democrats. Grimes wouldn't even admit she VOTED for Obama. I'm not really sure who came up with that strategy. If you can't enthuse your own party members to come out and vote for you, how are you supposed to enthuse Republican voters to do it?
Skittles
(153,169 posts)what makes you so sure she voted for him?
Chathamization
(1,638 posts)circumstances.
madville
(7,412 posts)If she had run with him and had him come in and campaign I doubt she would have managed anymore than the 40% she got by distancing herself. I didn't expect McConnell to get 56% though, I figured he would win 50-42 so the +16 result was kind of a surprise.
tritsofme
(17,380 posts)Clinton was denied 50% of the popular vote both times only due to Ross Perot. Clinton's margin of victory was 6 and 9 points respectively, which puts them about even in their first elections with an edge to Clinton in the second.
Clinton also scored marginally more impressive Electoral College victories in both of his elections compared to Obama.
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)Tommy2Tone
(1,307 posts)We might as well fight the right than have a Repubadem in office. There is a lesson here but I doubt other republican lite democrats will pay any attention.
kentuck
(111,103 posts)When Repubs feel threatened by a person, they attack him/her unmercifully. You haven't heard the end of ALG.
George II
(67,782 posts)...and she was just a point or two behind McConnell at that time. She wound up losing by SIXTEEN percent!
kentuck
(111,103 posts)Maybe not?
She wanted to be identified with the Clintons, a longtime family friend of the Lundergans.
I don't think anyone would have beaten McConnell in this race with Obama at 30% in the polls?
I would not be so quick to throw people under the bus.
George II
(67,782 posts)theHandpuppet
(19,964 posts)And not just in Kentucky. Look at what happened in Virginia.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)She woefully allowed McConnell to drive home the narrative that Obamacare was bad but that he'd save the ACA's Kentucky exchange - which he pretty much admits to wanting to defund.
By running away from Obama's accomplishments, she basically gave ground to McConnell on a whole host of issues.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts). . . $50 million dollars supporting McConnell, you might have a point.
But, the people of Kentucky weren't listening to her anyway.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)She didn't need to defend Obama - she could have defended the ACA. She failed spectacularly. Most Kentuckians WANT to keep their healthcare - she failed at telling them that repealing the ACA will do away with her healthcare. She was too afraid to be tied to the ACA to defend it, allowing McConnell to convince voters the ACA was not the same as their healthcare. What a joke.
kentuck
(111,103 posts)She may be the next Governor of Kentucky. I think some of her decisions may have had something to do with her family being a long-time friend of the Clintons, even her decision not to say who she voted for? She has known the Clintons since she was 14 years old. Who do you think could have done better against McConnell, under the same circumstances?
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)What I do know is that she was presented a golden opportunity and on one of the biggest issues where she could score points, she failed. Her messaging on the ACA was muddled at best and disastrous at worse.
Now Kentuckians, without much pushback, reelected a guy who wants to kill their healthcare - and the irony is that none of 'em seem to realize it. That's a message fail.
kentuck
(111,103 posts)But you don't know much about Kentucky voters, it appears?
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)If she hammered home the point that the ACA going away meant Kynect went away, too, she might've had a chance.
kentuck
(111,103 posts)No, they are not all walking idiots. Alison Grimes did better than some Democrats, and under tougher conditions, and against the Republican Leader of the Senate, and with a President at 29% approval. I think she did damn well under the circumstances.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Hillary Clinton spent over $30 million dollars in her re-election bid for Senator of the state of New York in 2006.
The state of New York had approximately 19 million residents in 2006.
A lot of political pundits were amazed at how much money she spent to get re-elected.
Hillary outspent her opponent, Jeanine Pirro, something like 10 to 1.
This year the Koch brothers spent at least $50 million dollars supporting McConnell in his re-election bid.
No one knows yet just how much the total amount of money McConnell spent for his own re-election in the state of Kentucky.
And we won't know until he files his last campaign finance report sometime later this year.
However, Kentucky is a much smaller state than New York.
The state of Kentucky only has approximately 4.2 residents in 2014.
Yet, this year McConnell just spent at least twice as much money as Hillary did back in 2006!
I don't know what the final dollar/vote will be for McConnell, but it will set a new record.
Of that, I am positive.
It will be way up there, way up in the upper stratosphere, somewhere well above $75/vote!!!
dbackjon
(6,578 posts)tabasco
(22,974 posts)Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)I said this often, getting Democrats to get and vote was very important, what was she thinking? She was going to peel off moderates and conservatives? Those people were already opposed to her, midterms really should be like the pep rally to the general election and you need to get your base energized and mobilized. She failed there big time.
mopinko
(70,127 posts)her campaign sucked like the vacuum of space.
moondust
(19,993 posts)Even if it's just an MSM narrative, lots of politicians will probably avoid them like the plague for fear of being dragged down themselves by them.
still_one
(92,219 posts)Yup, take to the folks in KY about global warming, and those coal folks will love you to death
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)nt
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)Out of context (but if used in YOUR context, factually untrue.)
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)fadedrose
(10,044 posts)or was it '12? She should find another mentor. Quick.
How could she be a Hillary Democrat when there's nobody named Hillary in the government. Very confusing.
(It's not as though Obama is thoroughly hated in Kentucky. She was, what?, 15 points behind? That means that the ones who voted for her do not hate Obama and she let them down with her cowardice....using the excuse that the voting booth is sacred, but not too sacred to say that she voted for Clinton. Strange people).
Cha
(297,323 posts)Whiteness?! I'm sure she didn't mean that but..you're right... very weird. Clinton's not in Office... Obama is. that the difference? Everyone is on the hate Obama wagon so she is too? smh
She actually said she voted for Hillary? omgs I heard she was a delegate to the Democratic National Convention that nominated Obama.. Oooops.
kentuck
(111,103 posts)They knew the President's ratings were very low in Kentucky?
Who knows?
fadedrose
(10,044 posts)Say that she did not approve of all of the President's actions/opinions where coal was involved . . . and say she planned to try to persuade him to change his mind....
Don't people in Kentucky care about a candidate's honesty? I wonder if Grimes is still a "Clinton" Democrat.
kentuck
(111,103 posts)Yes, I suppose she will still be a Clinton Democrat.
What "dishonesty" did you disapprove of?
fadedrose
(10,044 posts)But her refusal to say who she voted for in the election because of the sacred voting booth was dishonest. She had no trouble with the sacred voting booth admitting that she was a Clinton Democrat which had to mean she voted for Hillary in 2008, but maybe not. We'll never know, not because the voting booth is sacred, but she's afraid to be honest.
I don't really think she was dishonest, and that it was a lack of courage she needed not to throw Obama under the bus. The governor is a Democrat so whatever he did to get elected is what she might have tried...
Some elected Dems don't hold with gun control laws, abortions, marijuana, gay marriage, and other Democratic beliefs, but they get elected even when their views are known if they are for the meat/potato ideas Dems have about SS, Unemployment Ins., Unions, and a host of other popular ideals.
kentuck
(111,103 posts)..some might say, with his EO on carbon emissions back in May of this year, just as she was trying to gain support of the miners in her state, who were being laid off by the thousands. His timing had little concern for her political future. But, in the end, she did better than Barack Obama did in his last election. Maybe all candidates should be obligated to vote with the President regardless of how it might affect their own electoral chances? I hate to see her thrown under the bus after such a courageous fight against Mitch McConnell.
fadedrose
(10,044 posts)It's time somebody alive today said what he said.
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)get the red out
(13,466 posts)Too many people in this state despise the President, and racism, not policy, is the reason.
nolabels
(13,133 posts)When somebody is forced to see people as just people then change occurs. The tipping point often comes in a wink of eye
True Blue Door
(2,969 posts)NM_Birder
(1,591 posts)The refusal to say she voted for Obama was just extra fuel on the fire.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)"Coal keeps the lights on in Kentuckyplain and simpleand I will not stand idle as overreaching regulation adversely impacts jobs and middle-class families. Any new regulations must take into account the impact on Kentucky jobs and be based on current technology that will not drive Kentucky coal out of business," Grimes said.
Yeah, it is a wonder positions like this didn't get the base out to vote.
NM_Birder
(1,591 posts)The several times Grimes' staff was caught on tape gossiping about how she was just saying that to get elected had an impact. Grimes ran against McConell,..... a polished and experienced politician who made a career of winning elections.
Regardless what "pro-coal" speeches she made, her poorly ran campaign and sloppy support structure gave some voters reason to question her real truth regarding coal, her inability to support President Obama gave some voters pause on what her true political motives might be, and then the professional campaigner opponent sliced off an even larger portion of the voting block.
For all her good intentions, for all the polls that showed how close it was, the results showed clearly she was not the "one" to unseat Mitch McConnell. It's a shame, A better candidate, with a better organized structure may have been able to pull it off.
kentuck
(111,103 posts)Some folks here believed the Republican side of the story.
NM_Birder
(1,591 posts)turned out to be a little different.
I don't live in Kentucky, but I have to wonder, did your state REALLY think it was as close as the rest of us did ? Or was it as big a long shot as it turned out to be all along ?
kentuck
(111,103 posts)The rest of the Party was dead. Totally apathetic. She tried and failed. She does not deserve any more criticism than others that tried the same strategy. Personally, I think the Clintons hurt her more than her refusal to say who she voted for. Just my opinion.
NM_Birder
(1,591 posts)looking at the race from across the country it sure looked like it would have been closer than it was. Unlikely there was one single factor that shifted everyone so much. I would guess there lots of things adding up to cause voters to lose confidence.
I only know what the "news" reports so....... what is, is ........ and what I was led to believe,..... ain't.
I'm not convinced the Clinton's are helping anyone, anywhere, anymore.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)"Just saying it to get elected" is an incredibly poor way to try to win an election. If the insincerity doesn't shine through -- which it sounds like in this case it did-- then you are still stuck with failing to deliver on what you promised during your campaign.
NM_Birder
(1,591 posts)most everybody I know feels this way.
regardless what the "unemployment rate" is at 5.9%, the last six years have been as hard and challenging as any other time my friends and I can remember, (I'm 45). Most people who were starting up the economic food chain in 2008, got the muddy end of the stick the last six years........ Telling people they are better off, when they are not isn't the hope and change they expected. Tell all the still unemployed, and all the people in financial ruin and forclosure how wonderful the unemployment rate is, better yet call em stupid for not understanding, ..that worked out well.
The mis-information needs to be addressed,.....not just chant "republicans are bad and stupid and racist and ignorant". For the last 14 years, "republicans are stupid, ignorant, racist, homophone bible thumping pigs" is the message the Democratic party has lived, ....reject half the population, and then misrepresent the agenda to the other half and this is what you get........... a rev ed up opposition, and a depressed Democratic base. Viola ....... red red everywhere and not a clue why.
The House is red, the Senate is red, and the most disturbing of all, state legislature races are stacked red all over the place.
there will be a flood of finger pointers here in a second to "tell me the way it really is". Meanwhile, I'm very glad I started my own preparations for financial ruin BEFORE the 24 hours "news and opinion" bullshit cycle started.
kentuck
(111,103 posts)We do not and cannot know how she would have done if she had embraced Obama? Maybe she would have defeated McConnell? Maybe she would have reached Obama's approval rating? We cannot know.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)What we do know is that her actual strategy of embracing coal, guns, and jesus resulted in a colossal failure.
brooklynite
(94,598 posts)Looking for simple answers as to why we lost is a waste of time. Did we run "Republican light" for Governor in Massachusetts and Maryland?
SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)I wish someone would have sent Mitch packing, but she was not the one to do it..
kentuck
(111,103 posts)ecstatic
(32,712 posts)while ignoring the current first family was an utter disaster. Her team was convinced that Kentucky voters were racist and stupid. The Clintons played along with it, but at the end of the day, all of their visits and speeches didn't do anything. They should all be embarrassed.
SableonBlonde
(5 posts)There's no doubt Mitch would have hammered Ashley Judd on everything from her depression, divorce, living out of state, to her being a "Hollywood liberal." But for all of Alison's pandering, she got blown out anyway. In some of the rural counties, she only pulled in 25% of the vote. It's hard to imagine Judd would have done any worse than that. And, Judd may have built more support in Lexington and Louisville. Grimes won Lexington by only 5,000 votes. That's pathetic. Turnout in Louisville was 20% less than predicted. Congressman Yarmuth got more votes in Jefferson County than Grimes. I'd be willing to bet Judd would have down better. She may have appealed more to young people, who, for the most part, sat out this election.
And, she would have embraced the ACA, which has benefited more than half a million people in this state. She would have been honest about coal to Eastern Kentuckians, instead of feeding them lies that their coal jobs will come back.
Ugh.
kentuck
(111,103 posts)I noticed in the NYTimes today that Kentucky finished ahead of 38 states in voter turnout. I think she turned out more Democrats to vote than would have been the case but she also caused more Republicans to get out the vote. Just my opinion, but another Democrat may have been hard-pressed to get 20% in the apathetic state of Kentucky.