Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Burning down the house (Original Post) Skink Nov 2014 OP
Why? Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #1
Because the crazies run on the off years Skink Nov 2014 #3
"And a president from either party would benefit." Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #6
Horrible idea. CK_John Nov 2014 #2
No, thanks (nt) bigwillq Nov 2014 #4
No. It is well crafted as is. Go after gerrymandering & national voting stds on point Nov 2014 #5

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
6. "And a president from either party would benefit."
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 06:40 PM
Nov 2014

I don't want presidents -- of either party -- to benefit.

I want them scared shitless of offending the electorate.

on point

(2,506 posts)
5. No. It is well crafted as is. Go after gerrymandering & national voting stds
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 06:37 PM
Nov 2014

That is where part of the problem is. The other change I would make is only registered voters in a politician's district can give to him. Oh sorry apparently corps can't register to vote

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Burning down the house