Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBurning down the house
We need to give house members 4 years and it should corespond with Presidential elections.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 606 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Burning down the house (Original Post)
Skink
Nov 2014
OP
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)1. Why?
Skink
(10,122 posts)3. Because the crazies run on the off years
And a president from either party would benefit.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)6. "And a president from either party would benefit."
I don't want presidents -- of either party -- to benefit.
I want them scared shitless of offending the electorate.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)2. Horrible idea.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)4. No, thanks (nt)
on point
(2,506 posts)5. No. It is well crafted as is. Go after gerrymandering & national voting stds
That is where part of the problem is. The other change I would make is only registered voters in a politician's district can give to him. Oh sorry apparently corps can't register to vote