General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCharlie Pierce offers up a new possible 2016 Pres. candidate - Al Franken!
"Brother Dave Weigel points out that Al Franken ran a populist campaign for re-election -- straight, no chaser. His ads were direct, and their message was impressively disciplined. (It also helped that the Republicans ran the perfect foil for Franken's message, a guy who makes Willard Romney look like Henry Wallace.) If you're looking for a way to do this, Franken and his people have written the primer. So here's what I'm thinking -- why don't we hear Franken's name bandied more about as a Democratic presidential possibility in 2016? I suspect that the chances of Martin O'Malley, Esquire's Favorite Politician (tm), rather cratered the other night when his lieutenant governor got whipped, largely because he was a terrible candidate, but also because he was lieutenant governor under, ahem, Martin O'Malley. Senator Professor Warren doesn't want to run, even though the most compelling conclusion to be drawn from the blasted landscape of the Democratic campaign is that running away from her particular economic message is disastrous, no matter where you happen to be running. Franken showed through his campaign how you embrace the themes on which Warren has based her career in the context of a political campaign.
Since arriving in the Senate, Franken clearly has made the decision to be a workhorse, and not a show pony, which was something that his friend and mentor, the late Paul Wellstone, once told me was the first decision any new senator has to make. You can't run for president without showing a little show pony. Maybe he doesn't want to do that. But given the choice between the coronation of Hillary Clinton, and the suddenly desiccated range of options, it's hard not to see a space for Franken to run. Hell, back in the day, he even wrote a novel about a Franken Presidency. Was he kidding on the square? Good enough? Check. Smart enough? Check. The fact that this would cause Bill O'Reilly's head to detonate in a gorgeous orange fireball is merely a bonus."
http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/Why_Not_Al#comments
SalviaBlue
(2,917 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)And he could go on with - And you are worthy of me! You are America! You are worthy of me!
randys1
(16,286 posts)including Al who is brilliant
then look at theirs
HELLO, is THIS THING WORKING
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)He will not challenge the corporate oligarchy.
We can and need to do better. We need Bernie Sanders or someone very like him.
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)Enough of the coronation of Clinton, Sanders, and Warren.
Can we please have a field of candidates to choose from? Like- a wide field. A bloody primary did not hurt Obama in the end.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Too many liberals and they dilute the voting pool and the moderate wins. We need one great candidate that all liberals can support.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)We need a variety of Liberals to choose from, not just the few selected by operatives or the so called inevitable.
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)This guy - he could pull Gen X back from the Republican Abyss of tax cuts.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I am tired of looking at the same presidential candidates and feeling 'meh'. I could get excited to knock on door for him. He could help Millennials afford school, maybe? I need to go back, I've decided.
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)Paladin
(28,264 posts)Puglover
(16,380 posts)Why not? He would skewer any idiot Republican that tried to take him on.
Just the idea of that loathsome O'reilly's head exploding is mind candy.
maddiemom
(5,106 posts)on the Late Show with Stephen Colbert.
Puglover
(16,380 posts)Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)Actual choices to debate over. This is how we decide who we are, what the Democratic party actually consists of. Now, about a party platform........
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Well, eight years, anyway.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,735 posts)I've met him and I like him a lot, and I'm very glad he's my Senator (and that he soundly whupped the execrable Mike McFadden). What I really want right now, though, is a vigorous Democratic primary with a decent field of credible candidates. I do not want the automatic coronation of Hillary Clinton. If she wins following a well-contested primary, fine; I'll vote for her. But I'd sure like to see some other good Democrats at least hold her feet to the fire. The GOPers have already started reserving seats in their usual clown car. We can do much better than that. Let's get a half-dozen good, smart people, maybe including Al Franken, to come out and make Hillary fight for the nomination. Or maybe somebody else (maybe even a progressive candidate) gets it. I just want to see a well-contested primary.
genwah
(574 posts)he only does MN media, not national press. I doubt he's want to develop a national media presence in the next year and if he doesn't, the national audience will only know Stuart Smalley.
SolutionisSolidarity
(606 posts)for someone to take on the third way machine. These losers speak for no one; they have no natural consistency beyond the Washington cocktail circuit and TV pundit classes.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)Arthur_Frain
(1,853 posts)The truth is I'd prefer a smarmy ex-SNL comedian in the white house to Hillary.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,735 posts)He's very, very smart (he has a degree in political science from Harvard), and when you meet him in person you see how engaged and serious he is. He is absolutely not Stuart Smalley in real life.
amuse bouche
(3,657 posts)Bill O' Reilly is smarmy...not Al. You're Welcome !
Arthur_Frain
(1,853 posts)I LOVED him when he and Davis did their bits way back when, and I know that this is not his personae as a public servant, I'm aware of this. Yes I'd vote for him, but if you don't think the republican smear machine would trot out all those old misogynistic skits, then you are confused. Same folks who voted in droves this election would believe that those out of context bits the smear machine aired were real.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)LongTomH
(8,636 posts)......and run a populist campaign based on small donations (If that's even possible these days!)
If he can actually make it as far as the primary debates, I think his campaign will catch fire.
genwah
(574 posts)manager who was a candidate would almost certainly handle 'the Candidate' the way they wish they'd been handled. The Candidate, even if they've won before, never sees most of the mechanics of the campaign, doesn't decide the day to day allocation of resources or personnel.
Besides, we need Dr. Dean to head the DNC, coordinating and presenting the national message.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)One of the last true liberals.
Reter
(2,188 posts)Voted for NDAA and to extend the Patriot Act. He loves the police state.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)and reversed himself on PIPA *only* after it was clear it would not pass anyway.
He is a corporate animal on some of the most critical issues we face, despite his populist rhetoric. He will not challenge the corporate oligarchy.
We can and must do better. Bernie Sanders, for example.
Reter
(2,188 posts)In many ways, he's a mirror Marco Rubio, who the Tea Party call a Teo-Con (neo-con is Tea Party clothes). Will we ever have another Wellstone?
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)He saw what was happening and remained a voice for the people when others sold us out.
Bernie is really the only potential candidate I see right now who has a chance of building the awareness we need in this country of what has really been done to our government, and how thoroughly it has been corrupted.
We are a bipartisan corporate oligarchy now, and he is right that we will need a revolution of support for someone like him coming from the people, because change is not coming from the corporate insiders.
_______________________________
Ignore the 3rd Way shills with extreme prejudice
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025767160
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)what Democrat would you elect?
belzabubba333
(1,237 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,735 posts)I just don't think he's at all interested in the job.
belzabubba333
(1,237 posts)i guess it would depend on which woman
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,735 posts)Would I vote for Sarah Palin or Michele Bachmann or Jodi Ernst? Hell, no. It's pretty insulting, in fact, to suggest that a candidate's gender overrides other considerations. I am not fond of Hillary Clinton (though I'd vote for her over a Republican). I probably will not support her in a primary. The fact that she is a woman does not cancel out the fact that she is a pro-corporate Third Way Democrat.
belzabubba333
(1,237 posts)i wasnt trying to offend
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,735 posts)Your first post said "put al up for potus and you'll infuriate the women voters." You didn't qualify your statement at all, which led me to conclude that you regard all women voters as having a single mindset that considers the gender of a candidate as primary. That might not have been your intent, but it kind of seemed that way from your original choice of words. I just want to make the point that women are actual individual human beings with the capacity to think independently and make political choices based on considerations besides the gender of a candidate.
belzabubba333
(1,237 posts)first i said: put up al for potus and you'll infuriate the women voters. i was thinking hillary or elizabeth warren
then you said:How? I'm a woman voter and I like him a lot.
then i said : 29. well maybe im wrong but my thinking was that women were wanting a woman potus i guess it would depend on which woman at that point i thought of sarah
that was before you brought her up
blackcrowflies
(207 posts)who doesn't trash a woman he lived with for years and had kids with? I can't see voting for Franken.
belzabubba333
(1,237 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,735 posts)and here in MN I've never heard even unsourced gossip, not so much as a whisper, that there were problems in their marriage or that he has ever "trashed" her.
blackcrowflies
(207 posts)I got confused - I meant Alan Grayson.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,735 posts)I like his politics, but his personal life sounds like a disaster.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Unless its a true liberal candidate, like EW I just want a TRUE progressive. I wish Al Gore would try again.
rosesaylavee
(12,126 posts)I want someone who can f***ing do the job no matter what their gender is.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)byronius
(7,395 posts)Initech
(100,081 posts)Dopers_Greed
(2,640 posts)Tatiana
(14,167 posts)He might even make a good VP candidate. Hey, of St. Raygun could do it....
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)nt
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)hfojvt
(37,573 posts)LeftInTX
(25,383 posts)Were there medallions or commemorative coins involved?
progressoid
(49,991 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Senator Franken has indeed been a workhorse, like Paul Wellstone was. I have been proud to vote twice for Al Franken and would love to see him run. Why not?
Go for it, Al!
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Put him in the Primary mix and see what happens.
Dopers_Greed
(2,640 posts)That the DLC will never let it happen
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)He will not challenge the corporate oligarchy.
We need Bernie Sanders or someone like him.
mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)The America Live ticket.
Initech
(100,081 posts)Could you imagine Lewis Black giving the SOTU? That would be awesome!
mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)Do it back-in-black style
Initech
(100,081 posts)Stellar
(5,644 posts)Say no to Hillary.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)and I'd vote for him. although I hope it's not a walter mondale situation think it could be Elizabeth Warren on top Al Franken for VP
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)run Frankie, run!
wow, if only--
I would really, sreally, REALLY support Franken, even before Warren, I think.
Awful tough choice to make, but so delicious.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)vlyons
(10,252 posts)Hope he tests the waters
shenmue
(38,506 posts)I would also say John Conyers, but God bless him, the man is getting up there in years. No offense.
wheniwasincongress
(1,307 posts)his imaginary presidential career
baldguy
(36,649 posts)MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Really. He won't.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,735 posts)if he ran for President.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)He laughed and said, "No way."
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)MineralMan
(146,317 posts)I'm almost certain he won't run.
Peregrine Took
(7,415 posts)No way.
LukeFL
(594 posts)He may be a progressive and I love him but he will put anyone to sleep
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,735 posts)But he isn't running so the question is moot.
LukeFL
(594 posts)And I love him! But Americans don't like smart and interesting they like charisma and he doesn't have it.
He's funny but not that funny
Vattel
(9,289 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)who have a better chance of making it, IMO.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)Vattel
(9,289 posts)Response to Vattel (Reply #96)
whathehell This message was self-deleted by its author.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)That was my original answer to your question -- Sorry.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)It would be nice to have a President with expertise in something other than getting elected, and Warren certainly has economic expertise coupled with a genuine concern for economic justice. I like Brown better on military issues. Warren so far has not impressed me when she talks about war.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)I, too would like a president with "expertise in something other than getting elected"
and I didn't like Warren's remarks about Israel.
Good points
whathehell
(29,067 posts)brewens
(13,596 posts)SNL back in the 70's!
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)Iwillnevergiveup
(9,298 posts)rubbed off on Al Franken, that would be a good thing. He's done a decent job as a senator and showed a lot of class during the prolonged vote counting when he finally won.
But there's another wonderful Senator who needs to be looked over - Whitehouse from R.I. He's been magnificent on climate change. And imagine the bumper sticker: Whitehouse for the White House. Phooey on coronating Hillary.
Puglover
(16,380 posts)good friends.
A lot of Paul rubbed off on Al.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)ladjf
(17,320 posts)before I would support him for President. nt
True Blue Door
(2,969 posts)We need lots of options to avoid a Hillary coronation followed by Republican victory. I would prefer Jerry Brown, but there's a significant possibility he will refuse to run.
Success in a Minnesota election has almost no bearing on national prospects, but it has no negative bearing either. And Franken can be an entertaining guy when appropriate.