General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Extreme Wealth Is Bad for Everyone—Especially the Wealthy"
Extreme Wealth Is Bad for EveryoneEspecially the Wealthyby Michael Lewis at the New Republic
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/120092/billionaires-book-review-money-cant-buy-happiness
"SNIP........................
What is clear about rich people and their moneyand becoming ever cleareris how it changes them. A body of quirky but persuasive research has sought to understand the effects of wealth and privilege on human behaviorand any future book about the nature of billionaires would do well to consult it. One especially fertile source is the University of California, Berkeley, psychology department lab overseen by a professor named Dacher Keltner. In one study, Keltner and his colleague Paul Piff installed note-takers and cameras at city street intersections with four-way stop signs. The people driving expensive cars were four times more likely to cut in front of other drivers than drivers of cheap cars. The researchers then followed the drivers to the citys cross walks and positioned themselves as pedestrians, waiting to cross the street. The drivers in the cheap cars all respected the pedestrians right of way. The drivers in the expensive cars ignored the pedestrians 46.2 percent of the timea finding that was replicated in spirit by another team of researchers in Manhattan, who found drivers of expensive cars were far more likely to double park. In yet another study, the Berkeley researchers invited a cross section of the population into their lab and marched them through a series of tasks. Upon leaving the laboratory testing room the subjects passed a big jar of candy. The richer the person, the more likely he was to reach in and take candy from the jarand ignore the big sign on the jar that said the candy was for the children who passed through the department.
Maybe my favorite study done by the Berkeley team rigged a game with cash prizes in favor of one of the players, and then showed how that person, as he grows richer, becomes more likely to cheat. In his forthcoming book on power, Keltner contemplates his findings:
If I have $100,000 in my bank account, winning $50 alters my personal wealth in trivial fashion. It just isnt that big of a deal. If I have $84 in my bank account, winning $50 not only changes my personal wealth significantly, it matters in terms of the quality of my lifethe extra $50 changes what bill I might be able to pay, what I might put in my refrigerator at the end of the month, the kind of date I would go out on, or whether or not I could buy a beer for a friend. The value of winning $50 is greater for the poor, and, by implication, the incentive for lying in our study greater. Yet it was our wealthy participants who were far more likely to lie for the chance of winning fifty bucks.
There is plenty more like this to be found, if you look for it. A team of researchers at the New York State Psychiatric Institute surveyed 43,000 Americans and found that, by some wide margin, the rich were more likely to shoplift than the poor. Another study, by a coalition of nonprofits called the Independent Sector, revealed that people with incomes below twenty-five grand give away, on average, 4.2 percent of their income, while those earning more than 150 grand a year give away only 2.7 percent. A UCLA neuroscientist named Keely Muscatell has published an interesting paper showing that wealth quiets the nerves in the brain associated with empathy: if you show rich people and poor people pictures of kids with cancer, the poor peoples brains exhibit a great deal more activity than the rich peoples. (An inability to empathize with others has just got to be a disadvantage for any rich person seeking political office, at least outside of New York City.) As you move up the class ladder, says Keltner, you are more likely to violate the rules of the road, to lie, to cheat, to take candy from kids, to shoplift, and to be tightfisted in giving to others. Straightforward economic analyses have trouble making sense of this pattern of results.
........................SNIP"
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)I live in one of the poor suburbs of the Twin Cities and it's next to one of the fairly rich suburbs, I noticed the driving gets very bad in the suburb next to where I live. It's one of the scariest places I walk. It's very strange and it also seems people in nicer cars honk more. They honk when there is no real reason. The light changes and some people just honk like it's a reflex not because the lead driver is especially slow.
SunSeeker
(51,571 posts)But yeah, for the most part, it seems the rich are pathological wealth hoarders. Maybe it's a form of OCD.
applegrove
(118,682 posts)Schema Thing
(10,283 posts)than the non-wealthy, is the point. Money changes people, these studies show.
applegrove
(118,682 posts)ReRe
(10,597 posts)... The extremely wealthy love all the added power it gives them. They definitely don't look at it as something "bad" or harmful. They think it gives them right to run over everyone. On the sidewalk; in the grocery store (they are the ones who yell the most when they are immediately behind someone using foodstamps); getting on/off an elevator or escalator; on the highway. They love going out in the world so they can look down their long noses on the hoi-polloi. They look at EVERYONE as street people. If they do give to charity at all, it's because of the tax break. And by Gawd, if you are a charity, they always ask if your org gives a tax exemption. If they can't get that tax exemption receipt, they won't contribute to your org. EVEN if their donation is worn out clothes, they want that receipt. Then they will argue with you on how much the receipt should be made out for. On, and on, and on, and on.
Martin Eden
(12,870 posts)How many of them got rich by stepping on the backs of others?
hack89
(39,171 posts)SorellaLaBefana
(144 posts)tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)think cops